Tools & Wizards About Us
closetmaidpro.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 23

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    41% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

closetmaidpro.com

ClosetMaid Professional Services | Closets & Storage for the Pros

Page Load Speed

7.1 sec in total

First Response

41 ms

Resources Loaded

6.2 sec

Page Rendered

834 ms

closetmaidpro.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to closetmaidpro.com homepage info - get ready to check Closet Maid Pro best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about closetmaidpro.com

The support and services professionals need to design high-quality, best-in-design storage options and make projects more profitable.

Visit closetmaidpro.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Closetmaidpro.com page load time and found that the first response time was 41 ms and then it took 7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

closetmaidpro.com performance score

23

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value10.7 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value43.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value19.0 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,060 ms

25/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.042

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.7 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

closetmaidpro.com

41 ms

closetmaidpro.com

3693 ms

gtm.js

75 ms

css

52 ms

css

67 ms

Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (61 requests) were addressed to the original Closetmaidpro.com, 11% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Closetmaidpro.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.4 MB (16%)

Content Size

15.7 MB

After Optimization

13.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Closetmaidpro.com main page is 15.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 14.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 112.0 kB

  • Original 132.2 kB
  • After minification 127.4 kB
  • After compression 20.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 112.0 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 1.0 MB

  • Original 14.0 MB
  • After minification 13.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Closet Maid Pro images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 389.9 kB

  • Original 520.0 kB
  • After minification 448.3 kB
  • After compression 130.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 389.9 kB or 75% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 929.5 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB
  • After compression 155.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Closetmaidpro.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 929.5 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (42%)

Requests Now

64

After Optimization

37

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Closet Maid Pro. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

closetmaidpro.com

closetmaidpro.com

41 ms

closetmaidpro.com

closetmaidpro.com

3693 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

75 ms

css

css

52 ms

css

css

67 ms

css

css

97 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

38 ms

style.css

style.css

89 ms

cv.css

cv.css

68 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

88 ms

settings.css

settings.css

16 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

17 ms

style.css

style.css

25 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

27 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

47 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

69 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

41 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

69 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

39 ms

chat-icon-small-white.png

chat-icon-small-white.png

19 ms

CLMPRO-logo-1.jpg

CLMPRO-logo-1.jpg

20 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aXw.woff

21 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aXw.woff

26 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aXw.woff

33 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aXw.woff

37 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aXw.woff

38 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aXw.woff

43 ms

ShelfTrack-EVO-Slider-1.jpg

ShelfTrack-EVO-Slider-1.jpg

83 ms

Pro-Design-Tools-1.jpg

Pro-Design-Tools-1.jpg

46 ms

IBS-2024-Booth-360.png

IBS-2024-Booth-360.png

45 ms

MasterSuite-Slider-with-Swatches-1.jpg

MasterSuite-Slider-with-Swatches-1.jpg

109 ms

Continuing-Education-1.jpg

Continuing-Education-1.jpg

112 ms

MasterSuite-Slideshow-1130x540-2.jpg

MasterSuite-Slideshow-1130x540-2.jpg

35 ms

Slideshow-1130x540-1.jpg

Slideshow-1130x540-1.jpg

34 ms

MasterSuite-Slideshow-1130x540-1.jpg

MasterSuite-Slideshow-1130x540-1.jpg

62 ms

MasterSuite-Slideshow-1130x540-3.jpg

MasterSuite-Slideshow-1130x540-3.jpg

62 ms

ShelfTrack-EVO_1_1130x540_6.jpg

ShelfTrack-EVO_1_1130x540_6.jpg

72 ms

27th_Ave_Farmhouse_MasterSuite_WashedWhite_Timeless_Taupe_Fronts_OA_1130x540.png

27th_Ave_Farmhouse_MasterSuite_WashedWhite_Timeless_Taupe_Fronts_OA_1130x540.png

96 ms

ExpressShelf-Pantry-Propped-WHT-WHT_1130x540.png

ExpressShelf-Pantry-Propped-WHT-WHT_1130x540.png

90 ms

Good-TotalSlide_2.jpg

Good-TotalSlide_2.jpg

97 ms

Good-TotalSlide_1.jpg

Good-TotalSlide_1.jpg

117 ms

ExpressShelf_1_300x300.jpg

ExpressShelf_1_300x300.jpg

117 ms

ExpressShelf-Pantry-Propped-WHT-WHT_395x460.png

ExpressShelf-Pantry-Propped-WHT-WHT_395x460.png

107 ms

Best-MasterSuite27Avenue_2.jpg

Best-MasterSuite27Avenue_2.jpg

108 ms

Grid-tall-395x460-1.jpg

Grid-tall-395x460-1.jpg

109 ms

4.png

4.png

121 ms

Taylor-Morrison-2.png

Taylor-Morrison-2.png

120 ms

3.png

3.png

120 ms

dr-horton-3-logo.png

dr-horton-3-logo.png

152 ms

1.png

1.png

150 ms

NVR-logo-3.png

NVR-logo-3.png

153 ms

case-study-hanover-post-oak-460x460.jpg

case-study-hanover-post-oak-460x460.jpg

151 ms

Screen-Shot-2023-07-25-at-11.23.21-AM.png

Screen-Shot-2023-07-25-at-11.23.21-AM.png

157 ms

general-footer.jpg

general-footer.jpg

185 ms

Sustainability_logo_indoors.png

Sustainability_logo_indoors.png

167 ms

Sustainability_logo_recycle.png

Sustainability_logo_recycle.png

167 ms

dFa6ZfeM_74wlPZtksIFajo6-w.woff

dFa6ZfeM_74wlPZtksIFajo6-w.woff

34 ms

dFa5ZfeM_74wlPZtksIFYskZ6HOpXQ.woff

dFa5ZfeM_74wlPZtksIFYskZ6HOpXQ.woff

6 ms

chat-icon-large-teal.png

chat-icon-large-teal.png

15 ms

footer-video.jpg

footer-video.jpg

13 ms

wpdevart_lightbox_front.css

wpdevart_lightbox_front.css

13 ms

effects_lightbox.css

effects_lightbox.css

13 ms

slick-carousal.css

slick-carousal.css

39 ms

cv.js

cv.js

18 ms

hoverIntent.min.js

hoverIntent.min.js

19 ms

maxmegamenu.js

maxmegamenu.js

19 ms

jquery-ui.js

jquery-ui.js

17 ms

wpdevart_lightbox_front.js

wpdevart_lightbox_front.js

66 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

68 ms

slick.js

slick.js

69 ms

custom-tm.js

custom-tm.js

68 ms

color-thief.js

color-thief.js

15 ms

2174267.js

2174267.js

141 ms

banner-main-arrow.png

banner-main-arrow.png

51 ms

blue-arrows.png

blue-arrows.png

56 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

25 ms

Accessibility Review

closetmaidpro.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

closetmaidpro.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

closetmaidpro.com SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Closetmaidpro.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Closetmaidpro.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

closetmaidpro.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Closet Maid Pro. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: