Tools & Wizards About Us
cloudaccountingcomparison.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

cloudaccountingcomparison.co.uk

Online Accounting Reviews | Helping you choose accounting software

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

266 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

205 ms

cloudaccountingcomparison.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Cloud Accounting Comparison content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about cloudaccountingcomparison.co.uk

Reviews and comparisons across Cloud Accounting software packages including Xero, KashFlow and Clear Books

Visit cloudaccountingcomparison.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Cloudaccountingcomparison.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 266 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cloudaccountingcomparison.co.uk performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

cloudaccountingcomparison.co.uk

266 ms

www.cloudaccountingcomparison.co.uk

640 ms

www.cloudaccountingcomparison.co.uk

416 ms

skeleton.css

166 ms

style.css

360 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 60% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Cloudaccountingcomparison.co.uk, 10% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 8% (4 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (640 ms) belongs to the original domain Cloudaccountingcomparison.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 191.0 kB (56%)

Content Size

340.4 kB

After Optimization

149.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Cloudaccountingcomparison.co.uk main page is 340.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 170.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 22.8 kB

  • Original 28.6 kB
  • After minification 28.0 kB
  • After compression 5.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.8 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 8.3 kB

  • Original 59.4 kB
  • After minification 51.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Cloud Accounting Comparison needs image optimization as it can save up to 8.3 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-53%

Potential reduce by 89.9 kB

  • Original 170.8 kB
  • After minification 168.5 kB
  • After compression 80.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 89.9 kB or 53% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 70.0 kB

  • Original 81.6 kB
  • After minification 60.8 kB
  • After compression 11.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cloudaccountingcomparison.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 70.0 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (56%)

Requests Now

43

After Optimization

19

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cloud Accounting Comparison. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

cloudaccountingcomparison.co.uk

cloudaccountingcomparison.co.uk

266 ms

www.cloudaccountingcomparison.co.uk

www.cloudaccountingcomparison.co.uk

640 ms

www.cloudaccountingcomparison.co.uk

www.cloudaccountingcomparison.co.uk

416 ms

skeleton.css

skeleton.css

166 ms

style.css

style.css

360 ms

layout.css

layout.css

185 ms

formalize.css

formalize.css

192 ms

superfish.css

superfish.css

259 ms

style.css

style.css

355 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

626 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

377 ms

show_ads.js

show_ads.js

15 ms

app.js

app.js

394 ms

superfish.js

superfish.js

447 ms

jquery.formalize.min.js

jquery.formalize.min.js

453 ms

ga.js

ga.js

39 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

252 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

12 ms

118045424879046049547.png

118045424879046049547.png

196 ms

imgres-2.jpeg

imgres-2.jpeg

226 ms

Xero.jpeg

Xero.jpeg

223 ms

4stars.png

4stars.png

224 ms

BG.png

BG.png

194 ms

resize.png

resize.png

219 ms

KashFlow-e1330681870208.png

KashFlow-e1330681870208.png

239 ms

imgres.jpeg

imgres.jpeg

237 ms

3stars.png

3stars.png

217 ms

5stars.png

5stars.png

273 ms

thumb.php

thumb.php

477 ms

thumb.php

thumb.php

448 ms

ico_twitter.png

ico_twitter.png

213 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

11 ms

ca-pub-1818768537072258.js

ca-pub-1818768537072258.js

146 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

163 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

63 ms

stlogo.png

stlogo.png

332 ms

ads

ads

290 ms

osd.js

osd.js

31 ms

ads

ads

246 ms

Xero.jpeg

Xero.jpeg

190 ms

4stars.png

4stars.png

189 ms

imgres-2.jpeg

imgres-2.jpeg

228 ms

m_js_controller.js

m_js_controller.js

36 ms

abg.js

abg.js

59 ms

favicon

favicon

62 ms

googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png

googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png

50 ms

nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png

nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png

41 ms

s

s

22 ms

x_button_blue2.png

x_button_blue2.png

7 ms

fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js

fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js

3 ms

SEO Factors

cloudaccountingcomparison.co.uk SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cloudaccountingcomparison.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cloudaccountingcomparison.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

cloudaccountingcomparison.co.uk

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Cloud Accounting Comparison. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: