Report Summary

  • 51

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

cloudeg.com

Mespack | Find the packaging machines that fits your needs

Page Load Speed

3.9 sec in total

First Response

121 ms

Resources Loaded

2.8 sec

Page Rendered

962 ms

cloudeg.com screenshot

About Website

Visit cloudeg.com now to see the best up-to-date Cloudeg content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about cloudeg.com

Mespack and Cloud Packaging Solutions, have joined forces, providing tailored-made packaging machines for consumers packaged goods.

Visit cloudeg.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Cloudeg.com page load time and found that the first response time was 121 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cloudeg.com performance score

51

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

28/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.9 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.9 s

66/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value310 ms

78/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.0 s

34/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

cloudeg.com

121 ms

mespack.com

819 ms

premium-addons.min.css

310 ms

styles.css

201 ms

style.min.css

299 ms

Our browser made a total of 94 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Cloudeg.com, 90% (85 requests) were made to Mespack.com and 6% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (984 ms) relates to the external source Mespack.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 342.7 kB (18%)

Content Size

1.9 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

In fact, the total size of Cloudeg.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 272.0 kB

  • Original 323.1 kB
  • After minification 313.6 kB
  • After compression 51.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 272.0 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 70.8 kB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cloudeg images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (47%)

Requests Now

85

After Optimization

45

The browser has sent 85 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cloudeg. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 35 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

cloudeg.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

cloudeg.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

cloudeg.com SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cloudeg.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cloudeg.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Cloudeg. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: