Tools & Wizards About Us
cloudsponge.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 9

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    23% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

cloudsponge.com

CloudSponge | Improve Your Referral Marketing With Better Sharing.

Page Load Speed

2.3 sec in total

First Response

70 ms

Resources Loaded

770 ms

Page Rendered

1.5 sec

cloudsponge.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Cloud Sponge content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about cloudsponge.com

We help multiply your e-commerce store’s virality by improving sharing volume and increasing referral email open rates.Grow your business with CloudSponge.

Visit cloudsponge.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Cloudsponge.com page load time and found that the first response time was 70 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cloudsponge.com performance score

9

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value9.1 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value18.1 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value5,470 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.194

63/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value29.2 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.cloudsponge.com

70 ms

analytics.min.js

375 ms

aggregated_09a8adc98bb6f7a83b5c97fd0adb6cf0.css

19 ms

css

94 ms

aggregated_single_cebfd63738bbd18de59a4bfa03c928b7.css

66 ms

Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (65 requests) were addressed to the original Cloudsponge.com, 8% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (464 ms) relates to the external source Salesiq.zoho.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 515.0 kB (28%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Cloudsponge.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 180.4 kB

  • Original 242.0 kB
  • After minification 237.7 kB
  • After compression 61.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 180.4 kB or 75% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 213.5 kB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB
  • After compression 1.2 MB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 213.5 kB or 15% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-94%

Potential reduce by 121.1 kB

  • Original 129.0 kB
  • After minification 10.7 kB
  • After compression 7.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cloudsponge.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 121.1 kB or 94% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 59 (84%)

Requests Now

70

After Optimization

11

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cloud Sponge. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 55 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.cloudsponge.com

www.cloudsponge.com

70 ms

analytics.min.js

analytics.min.js

375 ms

aggregated_09a8adc98bb6f7a83b5c97fd0adb6cf0.css

aggregated_09a8adc98bb6f7a83b5c97fd0adb6cf0.css

19 ms

css

css

94 ms

aggregated_single_cebfd63738bbd18de59a4bfa03c928b7.css

aggregated_single_cebfd63738bbd18de59a4bfa03c928b7.css

66 ms

aggregated_single_378378e1e2965f45b2893871d55ceecd.css

aggregated_single_378378e1e2965f45b2893871d55ceecd.css

71 ms

aggregated_single_c64b9c66b7bb97011112fc4f3bb2de1d.css

aggregated_single_c64b9c66b7bb97011112fc4f3bb2de1d.css

69 ms

css

css

114 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

70 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

72 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

73 ms

autop.min.js

autop.min.js

77 ms

blob.min.js

blob.min.js

77 ms

block-serialization-default-parser.min.js

block-serialization-default-parser.min.js

76 ms

react.min.js

react.min.js

77 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

76 ms

deprecated.min.js

deprecated.min.js

75 ms

dom.min.js

dom.min.js

81 ms

react-dom.min.js

react-dom.min.js

80 ms

escape-html.min.js

escape-html.min.js

77 ms

element.min.js

element.min.js

78 ms

is-shallow-equal.min.js

is-shallow-equal.min.js

78 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

81 ms

keycodes.min.js

keycodes.min.js

81 ms

priority-queue.min.js

priority-queue.min.js

82 ms

compose.min.js

compose.min.js

82 ms

private-apis.min.js

private-apis.min.js

84 ms

redux-routine.min.js

redux-routine.min.js

84 ms

data.min.js

data.min.js

85 ms

html-entities.min.js

html-entities.min.js

83 ms

shortcode.min.js

shortcode.min.js

85 ms

blocks.min.js

blocks.min.js

88 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

92 ms

a11y.min.js

a11y.min.js

86 ms

moment.min.js

moment.min.js

88 ms

date.min.js

date.min.js

93 ms

primitives.min.js

primitives.min.js

91 ms

rich-text.min.js

rich-text.min.js

92 ms

warning.min.js

warning.min.js

93 ms

components.min.js

components.min.js

97 ms

url.min.js

url.min.js

36 ms

api-fetch.min.js

api-fetch.min.js

34 ms

keyboard-shortcuts.min.js

keyboard-shortcuts.min.js

31 ms

commands.min.js

commands.min.js

31 ms

notices.min.js

notices.min.js

30 ms

preferences-persistence.min.js

preferences-persistence.min.js

30 ms

preferences.min.js

preferences.min.js

31 ms

style-engine.min.js

style-engine.min.js

29 ms

token-list.min.js

token-list.min.js

29 ms

wordcount.min.js

wordcount.min.js

30 ms

block-editor.min.js

block-editor.min.js

83 ms

core-data.min.js

core-data.min.js

31 ms

media-utils.min.js

media-utils.min.js

31 ms

patterns.min.js

patterns.min.js

31 ms

server-side-render.min.js

server-side-render.min.js

31 ms

editor.min.js

editor.min.js

30 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

78 ms

lazysizes.min.js

lazysizes.min.js

76 ms

aggregated_dc00c9a608b2ca8bd6b174427ec1af9f.js

aggregated_dc00c9a608b2ca8bd6b174427ec1af9f.js

122 ms

fprom.js

fprom.js

119 ms

fscript.js

fscript.js

118 ms

widget

widget

464 ms

refer-a-friend-form-2.svg

refer-a-friend-form-2.svg

87 ms

invitations-form-2.svg

invitations-form-2.svg

82 ms

find-a-friend-form-1.svg

find-a-friend-form-1.svg

90 ms

choose-addressbook-provider-x4-scaled.webp

choose-addressbook-provider-x4-scaled.webp

102 ms

logo.svg

logo.svg

24 ms

surveymonkey-qdu7cw2r4d8ftzj8ty597hrxmk4d63tqdsl1ygp2bk.webp

surveymonkey-qdu7cw2r4d8ftzj8ty597hrxmk4d63tqdsl1ygp2bk.webp

23 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

36 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

66 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf

81 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4gaVc.ttf

92 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

92 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

93 ms

yelp-qdu7cw2r4d8gg31z28b12b1u1dh3b2zguzy6tgaigw.webp

yelp-qdu7cw2r4d8gg31z28b12b1u1dh3b2zguzy6tgaigw.webp

29 ms

gofundme-qdu7cw2r4d8hgwx6s18nhnuc22eavdl0zo82x3m9ds.webp

gofundme-qdu7cw2r4d8hgwx6s18nhnuc22eavdl0zo82x3m9ds.webp

4 ms

signupgenius-qdu7cw2r4d8gg31z28b12b1u1dh3b2zguzy6tgaigw.webp

signupgenius-qdu7cw2r4d8gg31z28b12b1u1dh3b2zguzy6tgaigw.webp

5 ms

Accessibility Review

cloudsponge.com accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

cloudsponge.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

cloudsponge.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cloudsponge.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cloudsponge.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

cloudsponge.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Cloud Sponge. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: