Tools & Wizards About Us
coastpowdercoating.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 39

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    58% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

coastpowdercoating.com

Coast Powder Coating - San Clemente |

Page Load Speed

6.9 sec in total

First Response

140 ms

Resources Loaded

6.4 sec

Page Rendered

376 ms

coastpowdercoating.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Coast Powder Coating content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about coastpowdercoating.com

Visit coastpowdercoating.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Coastpowdercoating.com page load time and found that the first response time was 140 ms and then it took 6.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

coastpowdercoating.com performance score

39

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

18/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.8 s

15/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value450 ms

63/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.031

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.3 s

15/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

coastpowdercoating.com

140 ms

coastpowdercoating.com

5799 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

207 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

207 ms

css

35 ms

Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 66% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Coastpowdercoating.com, 27% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Coastpowdercoating.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 728.6 kB (29%)

Content Size

2.5 MB

After Optimization

1.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Coastpowdercoating.com main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 174.2 kB

  • Original 207.1 kB
  • After minification 204.9 kB
  • After compression 32.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 174.2 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 22.5 kB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Coast Powder Coating images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 435.6 kB

  • Original 606.2 kB
  • After minification 605.7 kB
  • After compression 170.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 435.6 kB or 72% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 96.3 kB

  • Original 149.1 kB
  • After minification 148.5 kB
  • After compression 52.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Coastpowdercoating.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 96.3 kB or 65% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (73%)

Requests Now

26

After Optimization

7

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Coast Powder Coating. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

coastpowdercoating.com

coastpowdercoating.com

140 ms

coastpowdercoating.com

coastpowdercoating.com

5799 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

207 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

207 ms

css

css

35 ms

css

css

29 ms

style.css

style.css

144 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

270 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

196 ms

nfpluginsettings.js

nfpluginsettings.js

196 ms

Logo.png

Logo.png

328 ms

IMG_9911-scaled.jpg

IMG_9911-scaled.jpg

277 ms

5329.jpg

5329.jpg

392 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

196 ms

display-opinions-light.css

display-opinions-light.css

197 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

104 ms

display-structure.css

display-structure.css

182 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

383 ms

common.js

common.js

261 ms

e-202445.js

e-202445.js

19 ms

front-end--inputmask.min.js

front-end--inputmask.min.js

261 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

277 ms

backbone.min.js

backbone.min.js

335 ms

front-end-deps.js

front-end-deps.js

425 ms

front-end.js

front-end.js

338 ms

front-end.js

front-end.js

342 ms

ColorWheel.png

ColorWheel.png

438 ms

Logo2017_500w.png

Logo2017_500w.png

490 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf

19 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf

22 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf

28 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf

34 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVc.ttf

38 ms

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-4I-FWUUw.ttf

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-4I-FWUUw.ttf

34 ms

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-h4-FWUUw.ttf

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-h4-FWUUw.ttf

36 ms

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-ro-FWUUw.ttf

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-ro-FWUUw.ttf

36 ms

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-2Y-FWUUw.ttf

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-2Y-FWUUw.ttf

33 ms

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-NYiFWUUw.ttf

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-NYiFWUUw.ttf

39 ms

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-B4iFWUUw.ttf

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-B4iFWUUw.ttf

37 ms

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-WYiFWUUw.ttf

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-WYiFWUUw.ttf

39 ms

modules.woff

modules.woff

435 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

466 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

467 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

488 ms

Accessibility Review

coastpowdercoating.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

coastpowdercoating.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

coastpowdercoating.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Coastpowdercoating.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Coastpowdercoating.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

coastpowdercoating.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Coast Powder Coating. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: