Tools & Wizards About Us
cobalfa.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 40

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    59% of other websites

  • 66

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 31% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

cobalfa.com

Comercializadora de Forrajes de Cd. Delicias, Chihuahua, México - COBALFA

Page Load Speed

5.3 sec in total

First Response

709 ms

Resources Loaded

4.3 sec

Page Rendered

288 ms

cobalfa.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to cobalfa.com homepage info - get ready to check COBALFA best content right away, or after learning these important things about cobalfa.com

Compra-Venta de Alfalfa en Delicias, Chihuahua. Empresa con décadas de experiencia dentro del mercado de forrajes en el norte de México. Parafinanciera.

Visit cobalfa.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Cobalfa.com page load time and found that the first response time was 709 ms and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cobalfa.com performance score

40

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.5 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value16.6 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value200 ms

90/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.18

67/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.8 s

28/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.cobalfa.com

709 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

105 ms

styles.css

151 ms

jetpack.css

210 ms

rgs.css

132 ms

Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Cobalfa.com, 5% (3 requests) were made to S.gravatar.com and 2% (1 request) were made to S0.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) relates to the external source I2.wp.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 687.5 kB (30%)

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Cobalfa.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 21.1 kB

  • Original 27.3 kB
  • After minification 25.7 kB
  • After compression 6.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.1 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 7.3 kB

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. COBALFA images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 489.6 kB

  • Original 674.6 kB
  • After minification 633.6 kB
  • After compression 184.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 489.6 kB or 73% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 169.4 kB

  • Original 203.3 kB
  • After minification 177.5 kB
  • After compression 33.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cobalfa.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 169.4 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (69%)

Requests Now

51

After Optimization

16

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of COBALFA. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.cobalfa.com

www.cobalfa.com

709 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

105 ms

styles.css

styles.css

151 ms

jetpack.css

jetpack.css

210 ms

rgs.css

rgs.css

132 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

166 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

163 ms

style.css

style.css

213 ms

orbit.css

orbit.css

169 ms

colors.css

colors.css

196 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

312 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

204 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

277 ms

photon.js

photon.js

271 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

351 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

290 ms

devicepx-jetpack.js

devicepx-jetpack.js

10 ms

gprofiles.js

gprofiles.js

118 ms

wpgroho.js

wpgroho.js

264 ms

superfish.js

superfish.js

352 ms

easing.js

easing.js

353 ms

respond.js

respond.js

353 ms

swipe.min.js

swipe.min.js

353 ms

nicescroll.js

nicescroll.js

373 ms

sticky.js

sticky.js

352 ms

prettyPhoto.js

prettyPhoto.js

357 ms

flexslider.min.js

flexslider.min.js

356 ms

isotope.min.js

isotope.min.js

357 ms

carouFredSel.min.js

carouFredSel.min.js

360 ms

jplayer.min.js

jplayer.min.js

410 ms

orbit.js

orbit.js

387 ms

init.js

init.js

428 ms

nectar-love.js

nectar-love.js

416 ms

e-201611.js

e-201611.js

4 ms

hotjar-57035.js

hotjar-57035.js

225 ms

Camion-Cobalfa.jpg

Camion-Cobalfa.jpg

1480 ms

Alfalfa-31.jpg

Alfalfa-31.jpg

1269 ms

cobalfa.png

cobalfa.png

98 ms

responsive-menu.png

responsive-menu.png

219 ms

mag-glass.png

mag-glass.png

218 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

220 ms

to-top.png

to-top.png

220 ms

OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff

OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff

198 ms

OpenSans-Semibold-webfont.woff

OpenSans-Semibold-webfont.woff

197 ms

OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff

OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff

198 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

198 ms

OpenSansBold-webfont.woff

OpenSansBold-webfont.woff

199 ms

hovercard.css

hovercard.css

106 ms

services.css

services.css

114 ms

COBALFA-chorizos-16-9.jpg

COBALFA-chorizos-16-9.jpg

343 ms

alfalfa-e1429199143443.jpg

alfalfa-e1429199143443.jpg

272 ms

Fardos-alfalfa1-e1429198492562.jpg

Fardos-alfalfa1-e1429198492562.jpg

327 ms

g.gif

g.gif

22 ms

modules-043c1e6abe660c48857202e419ff9d8a.js

modules-043c1e6abe660c48857202e419ff9d8a.js

44 ms

visit-data

visit-data

219 ms

slider-arrows.png

slider-arrows.png

40 ms

slider-arrows-shadows.png

slider-arrows-shadows.png

40 ms

Accessibility Review

cobalfa.com accessibility score

66

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

cobalfa.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

cobalfa.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ES

  • Language Claimed

    ES

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cobalfa.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cobalfa.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

cobalfa.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of COBALFA. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: