19.2 sec in total
4.8 sec
13.5 sec
874 ms
Visit coco-baci.com now to see the best up-to-date Coco Baci content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about coco-baci.com
BUY NOW Unlock Radiant Smiles with Cocobaci’s Secrets in Gemmotherapy & Oil Pulling More products that will make you smile! Oil Pulling has NEVER tasted...
Visit coco-baci.comWe analyzed Coco-baci.com page load time and found that the first response time was 4.8 sec and then it took 14.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
coco-baci.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value12.4 s
0/100
10%
Value21.5 s
0/100
25%
Value36.9 s
0/100
10%
Value1,250 ms
19/100
30%
Value0.006
100/100
15%
Value22.2 s
1/100
10%
4813 ms
612 ms
916 ms
918 ms
925 ms
Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (75 requests) were addressed to the original Coco-baci.com, 10% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Coco-baci.com.
Page size can be reduced by 80.7 kB (11%)
741.6 kB
660.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Coco-baci.com main page is 741.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 479.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 75.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 75.6 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 964 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Coco Baci needs image optimization as it can save up to 964 B or 58% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 2.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 1.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Coco-baci.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 73 (95%)
77
4
The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Coco Baci. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 47 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 28 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
coco-baci.com
4813 ms
styles.css
612 ms
twb_wc_reviews_main.css
916 ms
slick.css
918 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
925 ms
swiper.min.css
930 ms
post-9416.css
930 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
935 ms
global.css
1226 ms
post-9395.css
1229 ms
xstore.min.css
1544 ms
wpb.min.css
1240 ms
js_composer.min.css
1859 ms
elementor.min.css
1247 ms
sidebar.min.css
1535 ms
breadcrumbs.min.css
1539 ms
back-top.min.css
1552 ms
global.min.css
1564 ms
contact-forms.min.css
1845 ms
kirki-styles.css
4405 ms
style.css
1852 ms
css
35 ms
jquery.min.js
2164 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1878 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
2155 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
2162 ms
js.cookie.min.js
2169 ms
woocommerce.min.js
2193 ms
woocommerce-add-to-cart.js
2465 ms
etheme-scripts.min.js
2176 ms
frontend.min.js
2179 ms
js.cookie-2.1.3.min.js
2184 ms
jquery.bind-first-0.2.3.min.js
2210 ms
public.js
2790 ms
css2
18 ms
widget-woocommerce.min.css
2487 ms
archive.min.css
2488 ms
swatches.min.css
2493 ms
js
58 ms
api.js
37 ms
widget-icon-list.min.css
2522 ms
widget-posts.min.css
2483 ms
pagination.min.css
2182 ms
animations.min.css
2187 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
2211 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
2465 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
2472 ms
hooks.min.js
2470 ms
i18n.min.js
2186 ms
main.js
2222 ms
index.js
2461 ms
index.js
2459 ms
slick.min.js
2177 ms
sourcebuster.min.js
2183 ms
order-attribution.min.js
2210 ms
index.js
2455 ms
comment-reply.min.js
2452 ms
imagesLoaded.js
2176 ms
woocommerce.min.js
2179 ms
mini-cart.min.js
2204 ms
jquery.lazyload.js
2436 ms
swiper.min.js
2174 ms
tabs.min.js
2165 ms
effect-mouse.min.js
2177 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
2305 ms
fixedHeader.min.js
2438 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
2176 ms
back-top.min.js
2170 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
2179 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
2226 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
2433 ms
frontend.min.js
2168 ms
waypoints.min.js
2168 ms
core.min.js
2175 ms
frontend.min.js
2202 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
2164 ms
xstore-placeholder-1x1-qphq3t1ae1155p8o01digcf3svpwthfng7saa8q890.png
867 ms
xstore-placeholder-800x800-qphq3t1ae1155p8o01digcf3svpwthfng7saa8q890.png
868 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff
40 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff
71 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-.woff
82 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzQ.woff
88 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff
100 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc-.woff
100 ms
UqyVK80NJXN4zfRgbdfbo55cUQ.woff
155 ms
1Pt_g8LJRfWJmhDAuUsSQamb1W0lwk4S4TbMPrc.woff
100 ms
1Pt_g8LJRfWJmhDAuUsSQamb1W0lwk4S4Y_LPrc.woff
99 ms
xstore-icons-light.ttf
1106 ms
recaptcha__en.js
50 ms
coco-baci.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
coco-baci.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
coco-baci.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Coco-baci.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Coco-baci.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
coco-baci.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Coco Baci. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: