15.2 sec in total
284 ms
12.2 sec
2.8 sec
Visit cocoetfreddy.com now to see the best up-to-date COCO Et Freddy content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about cocoetfreddy.com
Discover Wedding Day-tox, a detox, beauty and fit program for the future bride, but also her family and friends.
Visit cocoetfreddy.comWe analyzed Cocoetfreddy.com page load time and found that the first response time was 284 ms and then it took 14.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
cocoetfreddy.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.5 s
16/100
10%
Value16.3 s
0/100
25%
Value70.3 s
0/100
10%
Value310 ms
77/100
30%
Value0.285
42/100
15%
Value45.1 s
0/100
10%
284 ms
974 ms
314 ms
335 ms
335 ms
Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Cocoetfreddy.com, 4% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (10.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Cocoetfreddy.com.
Page size can be reduced by 147.1 kB (1%)
10.8 MB
10.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Cocoetfreddy.com main page is 10.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 10.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 27.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.2 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 73.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. COCO Et Freddy images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 23.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 23.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cocoetfreddy.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 23.7 kB or 28% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (37%)
62
39
The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of COCO Et Freddy. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
cocoetfreddy.com
284 ms
974 ms
v_269_cd865ba851bcb30b04979d05390bb4e6_all.css
314 ms
custom.css
335 ms
lightbox.css
335 ms
animate.css
337 ms
v_120_c11d0ce93412a73a3e593b641030b161.js
651 ms
lym3nvf.js
97 ms
custom.js
384 ms
owl.carousel.js
441 ms
ttprogressbar.js
431 ms
lightbox-2.6.min.js
461 ms
waypoints.min.js
467 ms
inview.js
465 ms
parallex.js
544 ms
api.js
45 ms
my-shop-logo-1490916359.jpg
566 ms
20-0_thumb.jpg
574 ms
21-0_thumb.jpg
592 ms
18-0_thumb.jpg
584 ms
22-0_thumb.jpg
790 ms
85b94916427f5ad9175f0000e46bc025f6fe8a3d_1-gb.jpg
923 ms
6cdb64594b59b235b31e22d4cc1c90de42b3481d_SLIDER_ONCE_UPON_Fotor01.jpg
1439 ms
3bdd3a0a020aa9b8cbba1580fd506c06fdf87944_2-gb.jpg
1674 ms
6950dd7e08c73c21c0c9c944c63950c9dd153636_3-gb.jpg
1342 ms
ac3c5c4e52e2c876efa55b0886469432f05fc1c6_4-gb.jpg
1148 ms
White.jpg
792 ms
SQUARE_WDT.jpg
1258 ms
RECTANGLE_WDT_GB-old.jpg
2100 ms
SQUARE_BDT.jpg
1246 ms
RECTANGLE_BDT_GB-old.jpg
1711 ms
SQUARE_PDT.jpg
1588 ms
RECTANGLE_PDT_GB-old.jpg
9591 ms
SQUARE_ONCE_UPON_HOME_Fotor03.jpg
1733 ms
RECTANGLE_ONCE_UPON_1.jpg
10256 ms
Icones_HomeMadeWDT_Home_GB.png
1918 ms
Gallery_Beaute.jpg
1838 ms
Gallery_Bride_05.jpg
1920 ms
Gallery_Bride_02.jpg
1966 ms
Gallery_Bride_06.jpg
2118 ms
Gallery_Bride_04.jpg
1801 ms
Gallery_Bride_01.jpg
1773 ms
Logo_C&F_Footer.png
1898 ms
sprite.png
1861 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
2021 ms
questrial-regular-webfont.woff
1893 ms
ajax-loader.gif
1914 ms
back-bottom.png
1898 ms
back-top.png
1973 ms
close.png
2010 ms
loading.gif
1974 ms
prev.png
1956 ms
next.png
1979 ms
recaptcha__en.js
150 ms
fbevents.js
178 ms
analytics.js
220 ms
bx_loader.gif
1830 ms
prev.png
1844 ms
d
25 ms
next.png
1858 ms
p.gif
67 ms
325688781287070
67 ms
ec.js
23 ms
collect
15 ms
collect
50 ms
js
78 ms
ga-audiences
16 ms
cocoetfreddy.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
cocoetfreddy.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
cocoetfreddy.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cocoetfreddy.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cocoetfreddy.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
cocoetfreddy.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of COCO Et Freddy. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: