4.2 sec in total
284 ms
3.8 sec
141 ms
Visit code-x.ws now to see the best up-to-date Code X content for Peru and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about code-x.ws
Visit code-x.wsWe analyzed Code-x.ws page load time and found that the first response time was 284 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
code-x.ws performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.1 s
82/100
10%
Value2.1 s
96/100
25%
Value2.7 s
96/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value2.1 s
99/100
10%
284 ms
1043 ms
97 ms
321 ms
252 ms
Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Code-x.ws, 15% (6 requests) were made to I2.wp.com and 10% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) relates to the external source I2.wp.com.
Page size can be reduced by 266.1 kB (42%)
634.6 kB
368.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Code-x.ws main page is 634.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 371.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 53.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.8 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 53.6 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 14.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Code X images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 198.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 198.1 kB or 53% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (32%)
37
25
The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Code X. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
code-x.ws
284 ms
1043 ms
index.php
97 ms
index.php
321 ms
index.php
252 ms
adsbygoogle.js
9 ms
ips.status.js
172 ms
photo-thumb-7696.jpg
129 ms
user_navigation.png
126 ms
branding_bg.png
125 ms
logo.png
171 ms
f_icon_read.png
124 ms
icon_lock.png
125 ms
comments.png
161 ms
top.png
162 ms
feed.png
164 ms
index.php
291 ms
photo-thumb-12.jpg
162 ms
photo-thumb-16547.png
163 ms
photo-thumb-9316.jpg
166 ms
photo-thumb-16852.png
441 ms
photo-thumb-13237.jpg
169 ms
photo-thumb-7561.gif
488 ms
photo-thumb-16881.jpg
241 ms
ca-pub-4339178831954756.js
45 ms
zrt_lookup.html
49 ms
show_ads_impl.js
48 ms
maintitle.png
136 ms
cat_minimize.png
207 ms
subforum_stem.png
209 ms
default_large.png
1998 ms
default_large.png
2017 ms
default_large.png
2019 ms
default_large.png
2017 ms
default_large.png
2042 ms
default_large.png
2016 ms
34074
308 ms
ads
174 ms
osd.js
15 ms
code-x.ws accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
code-x.ws best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Registers an unload listener
Detected JavaScript libraries
code-x.ws SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
EN
EN
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Code-x.ws can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Code-x.ws main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
code-x.ws
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Code X. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: