1.4 sec in total
72 ms
904 ms
456 ms
Welcome to codebabes.com homepage info - get ready to check Code Babes best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about codebabes.com
Visit codebabes.comWe analyzed Codebabes.com page load time and found that the first response time was 72 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
codebabes.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.7 s
12/100
10%
Value5.8 s
15/100
25%
Value6.9 s
33/100
10%
Value60 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value11.8 s
17/100
10%
72 ms
21 ms
35 ms
321 ms
22 ms
Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (55 requests) were addressed to the original Codebabes.com, 15% (10 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (321 ms) relates to the external source Use.typekit.net.
Page size can be reduced by 475.6 kB (38%)
1.2 MB
767.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Codebabes.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 692.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 45.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.5 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 76.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Code Babes needs image optimization as it can save up to 76.8 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 219.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 219.2 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 134.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Codebabes.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 134.2 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (21%)
57
45
The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Code Babes. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
codebabes.com
72 ms
css_uM5Y-ZQsGuHytM0oRmI67CogV2HTC3AmOH8DWx1hLLI.css
21 ms
css_RwbQc1wMxPkLficw36suwWJRkqEGwQIMve51JT4QWWg.css
35 ms
oyy8isz.js
321 ms
code-babes-logo.png
22 ms
Sign-in-with-Twitter-lighter.png
20 ms
x-bg.png
22 ms
babe-icon-white.png
26 ms
cami-sprite-comp.png
51 ms
code-monitor.png
50 ms
babe-monitor.png
62 ms
play-arrow.png
37 ms
tiny-grid.png
37 ms
f2-bg.png
38 ms
babe-sprite2.png
63 ms
cami.jpg
65 ms
tone.png
60 ms
Cami22.jpg
70 ms
chenelle2.jpg
61 ms
veronica.jpg
77 ms
melissa_0.jpg
72 ms
des.jpg
72 ms
lib-color.png
89 ms
royal-chipmunk_0.jpg
74 ms
facebook-avatar_0.png
75 ms
facebook-avatar.png
74 ms
avatar-cheezburger.png
75 ms
diagmonds.png
79 ms
huffpost-logo.png
79 ms
fastcompany-logo.png
80 ms
forbes-logo.png
81 ms
washington-post-logo.png
81 ms
gizmodo-logo.png
83 ms
bold-italic-logo.png
86 ms
independent-logo.png
86 ms
techcrunch-logo.png
92 ms
on-the-media-logo.png
93 ms
salon-logo.png
94 ms
bustle-logo.png
94 ms
js_c8AgymZ63FXYmkXaWrxB_5mxA1YjdNsgPCtmlOAtUdk.js
108 ms
js_hZ0Zxg_CswaQuywjsk6wAXkIvsACcr7Ct6NmWKRF3TE.js
98 ms
js_TGt4Bz2WQNO2l8-kQRpmF_J7K3WB-qqhpTEDuzSnHec.js
98 ms
js_NZi7Ds9JdTTOAp8Y-yrThmbKtHtMR42ktNQyZ1TsR3I.js
101 ms
memebase.png
95 ms
verge-logo.png
83 ms
valleywag-logo.png
84 ms
stripe-logo.png
231 ms
cami.jpg
211 ms
Cami22.jpg
211 ms
chenelle2.jpg
207 ms
veronica.jpg
208 ms
melissa_0.jpg
208 ms
footer-logo.png
206 ms
menu-leaf.png
204 ms
menu-expanded.png
199 ms
analytics.js
85 ms
KH_g_5CSXu1tH8Qrr0aAAQ.woff
106 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
56 ms
codebabes.com
87 ms
collect
64 ms
Ck3beKtDZAPQusd--6U6CM857FkBETiONlsOMH-9VstffOYngsM-eMJ6Mk6f5Mb.woff
29 ms
jPSCa6jqHYtW6BUl0RngkzjAGt66807qAz6lI5plwLGffOLngsM-eMJ6Mk6f5MS.woff
67 ms
ce79-M2l6RgW2G9qg3EY7bYCvb0EBTbyEfuzs0zbZ_MffOOngsM-eMJ6Mk6f5Mt.woff
90 ms
7IurEvfsHCzXUghdHQFGZ0NCjcokbCA14p2EPrzjDOXffORngsM-eMJ6Mk6f5gI.woff
124 ms
6G_JIUnyyA-SlV66-dYLKhSNeEpKwBPHzWJrjzJdeOXff5V8ggM-eMJ6Mk6f5MS.woff
130 ms
lyVxPB4ZeIrbvltmUinyp20DwGYiRUlde5TxcATLkxJffFx8ggM-eMJ6Mk6f5Mb.woff
158 ms
PGBpecp9PAUuLCElX78JdAaLZGPSeQLt4pqlaS-nvyjff5Q8ggM-eMJ6Mk6f5gI.woff
157 ms
qeIwUBxcyX0ZnB0BdO3TB3-k-wCKK1WaJVMVkSn7jvIff528ggM-eMJ6Mk6f5Mt.woff
158 ms
codebabes.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
codebabes.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
codebabes.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Codebabes.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Codebabes.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
codebabes.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Code Babes. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: