4.9 sec in total
506 ms
3.4 sec
992 ms
Welcome to codecamp.jp homepage info - get ready to check Codecamp best content for Japan right away, or after learning these important things about codecamp.jp
CodeCamp(コードキャンプ)はオンラインのプログラミング/Webデザイン学習サービス。実践型カリキュラムで、技術力/指導力を備えた講師が徹底的に指導。DXを実現するなら、オンラインのプログラミング/Webデザイン学習CodeCamp
Visit codecamp.jpWe analyzed Codecamp.jp page load time and found that the first response time was 506 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
codecamp.jp performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.0 s
9/100
10%
Value11.9 s
0/100
25%
Value10.1 s
9/100
10%
Value1,830 ms
9/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value22.2 s
1/100
10%
506 ms
1257 ms
1535 ms
1924 ms
119 ms
Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Codecamp.jp, 50% (28 requests) were made to S3-ap-northeast-1.amazonaws.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) relates to the external source S3-ap-northeast-1.amazonaws.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (58%)
1.9 MB
785.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Codecamp.jp main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 874.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 67.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 67.4 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 44.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Codecamp images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 632.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 632.4 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 344.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Codecamp.jp needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 344.6 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (41%)
51
30
The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Codecamp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
codecamp.jp
506 ms
application-0196f746f5ec6ae4a1da5e52afb17bcd9922abaa17ac4afeb2d798171758105b.css
1257 ms
react-7368c1e52d41460fa3633b4d211039115f569db526b42d29ab66f9ad1db5ca4b.js
1535 ms
static_pages-8c34f908cc01829bb73bf2d11ea0479f71a8a41da1c3603014738076ceb6688d.js
1924 ms
gtm.js
119 ms
analytics.js
117 ms
logo-17538f84ed9e710070a544f3869396822a6c7fd852a9ff0d58b0f43fe1704b3b.png
172 ms
black-dot-17ec61be24988d6f009f35951e1edb4f719974dd54241e17cd23fb666fbb230e.png
346 ms
logo_white-58c4a28f5ccf27eff203dfe5e11b171d0b6c82786fc8f929c496215f0731ef90.png
526 ms
icon01-01dafcbb6db820a72302d729af0769e7a72250f10586f19cd312017912619cac.png
550 ms
image01-c08358eeaf3e78c352e500f17facc17f210ba8700eb473abd2a76856ff78a36b.png
626 ms
original.png
967 ms
original.png
970 ms
original.png
763 ms
image02-ac43b04ed496383300a2f5a3f2349410f151b540f72ccc358fe01fa4d9f2bdb2.png
970 ms
image03-dce45603626bd4a77216d5d4d7c7afe1ea649ac7ffc63def1354002485913976.png
969 ms
serviceSymbols-2649042a3f59a9c1dc477c8297ee0022cff45ed79befcce106139cec20f5c80d.png
1101 ms
loading-30.gif
970 ms
15.JPG
1007 ms
21.JPG
1013 ms
18.jpg
1145 ms
16.jpeg
1290 ms
corporateSymbols-419838bfbfda72b46826dd3bcbebb911e838c584dd3aa7a1a8398460b196caa9.png
1160 ms
pta.js
363 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
592 ms
collect
23 ms
collect
55 ms
ct_tag.php
531 ms
conversion_async.js
16 ms
42 ms
36 ms
290e2f57.js
556 ms
seo.php
650 ms
s_retargeting.js
675 ms
fql.query
165 ms
iframe_api
160 ms
image05-2-fa24b65a1e26abcbcab939e5fc9252d8c895366991bd2e97e468b79474dce0be.png
551 ms
image04-2-8dd9db78407358491524192c74d1f36113244ba404aa3e5dc41e47e05d66c19e.png
315 ms
image06-2-7c6ee00d11673415d328721e959a928cb1b8893fa1f143eb6d76efba12755649.png
320 ms
professional_02-ed8efcc47cbf6d1d3ac3bf080a5412c7a26c5d0091ee774e2a62c5161e948b4c.jpg
560 ms
professional_04-25cb40d764dce9abd0d55b2f129fcedacaa1f4c7cd66ec5a8f26495e3572d8be.jpg
389 ms
professional_01-b784744f0abd5a4c5e84e5eb63f060b1e1d4cd08a5a131e76914d964e62f50af.jpg
559 ms
professional_05-832fabd6066b9add22ac6d0b90647eb7c309cc4140b3cb5bd639079264db045f.jpg
561 ms
rogo_codebu-0559a57965781ab9cbb2b1e4480912e8c84d8c96af75fb78c5040002a0b95672.png
560 ms
pn
489 ms
www-widgetapi.js
54 ms
ruXLk9U14rc
83 ms
www-embed-player-vflQrT_sR.css
21 ms
www-embed-player.js
77 ms
base.js
147 ms
MdyApZkAHG2-UELdOwjNjjFZXSz-CGj4o1JtDR7aGgs.js
24 ms
ad_status.js
67 ms
2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff
70 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
77 ms
fbds.js
152 ms
25 ms
codecamp.jp accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
codecamp.jp best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
codecamp.jp SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
JA
JA
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Codecamp.jp can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Codecamp.jp main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
codecamp.jp
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Codecamp. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: