Tools & Wizards About Us
codection.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 22

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    40% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

codection.com

Codection - Plugins, WordPress, WooCommerce, pasarelas de pago para RedSys y Ceca

Page Load Speed

5.4 sec in total

First Response

363 ms

Resources Loaded

4.7 sec

Page Rendered

316 ms

codection.com screenshot

About Website

Visit codection.com now to see the best up-to-date Codection content for Spain and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about codection.com

Codection es una empresa especializada en el desarrollo de plugins premium, libres y a medida para WordPress y WooCommerce.

Visit codection.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Codection.com page load time and found that the first response time was 363 ms and then it took 5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

codection.com performance score

22

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

36/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.7 s

7/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,070 ms

7/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.004

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.2 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

codection.com

363 ms

codection.com

2838 ms

autoptimize_3fddc91498eb72e05be34e1cef3926b9.css

323 ms

css

35 ms

hooks.min.js

234 ms

Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (70 requests) were addressed to the original Codection.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Codection.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 331.5 kB (20%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Codection.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 188.0 kB

  • Original 254.9 kB
  • After minification 254.9 kB
  • After compression 66.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 188.0 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 82.0 kB
  • After minification 82.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Codection images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 103.0 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB
  • After compression 1.0 MB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 40.5 kB

  • Original 156.7 kB
  • After minification 156.7 kB
  • After compression 116.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Codection.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 40.5 kB or 26% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 65 (92%)

Requests Now

71

After Optimization

6

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Codection. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 66 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

codection.com

codection.com

363 ms

codection.com

codection.com

2838 ms

autoptimize_3fddc91498eb72e05be34e1cef3926b9.css

autoptimize_3fddc91498eb72e05be34e1cef3926b9.css

323 ms

css

css

35 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

234 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

235 ms

frontend-gtag.min.js

frontend-gtag.min.js

238 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

362 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

248 ms

autoptimize_single_c41a1268ea436c9910e87db9a052713e.js

autoptimize_single_c41a1268ea436c9910e87db9a052713e.js

310 ms

autoptimize_single_0f17ceb0e5032e1b3404749ea73234d7.js

autoptimize_single_0f17ceb0e5032e1b3404749ea73234d7.js

312 ms

jquery.blockUI.min.js

jquery.blockUI.min.js

316 ms

js.cookie.min.js

js.cookie.min.js

372 ms

woocommerce.min.js

woocommerce.min.js

388 ms

select2.full.min.js

select2.full.min.js

490 ms

zxcvbn-async.min.js

zxcvbn-async.min.js

395 ms

password-strength-meter.min.js

password-strength-meter.min.js

398 ms

password-strength-meter.min.js

password-strength-meter.min.js

480 ms

lazysizes.min.js

lazysizes.min.js

480 ms

autoptimize_single_43851cc7b7e0059bb28df0ba02ec1d0b.js

autoptimize_single_43851cc7b7e0059bb28df0ba02ec1d0b.js

480 ms

autoptimize_single_efc27e253fae1b7b891fb5a40e687768.js

autoptimize_single_efc27e253fae1b7b891fb5a40e687768.js

489 ms

autoptimize_single_0b1719adf5fa7231cb1a1b54cf11a50e.js

autoptimize_single_0b1719adf5fa7231cb1a1b54cf11a50e.js

488 ms

autoptimize_single_79ebb4e295a9a24dbcaa181a6bd9855b.js

autoptimize_single_79ebb4e295a9a24dbcaa181a6bd9855b.js

491 ms

sourcebuster.min.js

sourcebuster.min.js

494 ms

order-attribution.min.js

order-attribution.min.js

540 ms

autoptimize_single_830dae7fb9dfd5ac1879a83dd028083d.js

autoptimize_single_830dae7fb9dfd5ac1879a83dd028083d.js

545 ms

foundation.min.js

foundation.min.js

551 ms

jquery.hoverIntent.min.js

jquery.hoverIntent.min.js

573 ms

swiper-bundle.min.js

swiper-bundle.min.js

654 ms

salvattore.min.js

salvattore.min.js

576 ms

autoptimize_single_5bc964d2dc9b0ee5d2041bb4e9d54943.js

autoptimize_single_5bc964d2dc9b0ee5d2041bb4e9d54943.js

617 ms

devbridge-jquery-autocomplete.min.js

devbridge-jquery-autocomplete.min.js

622 ms

joinchat.min.js

joinchat.min.js

630 ms

api.js

api.js

62 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

637 ms

autoptimize_single_ec0187677793456f98473f49d9e9b95f.js

autoptimize_single_ec0187677793456f98473f49d9e9b95f.js

695 ms

enlighterjs.min.js

enlighterjs.min.js

773 ms

complianz.min.js

complianz.min.js

702 ms

react.min.js

react.min.js

707 ms

react-dom.min.js

react-dom.min.js

644 ms

react-jsx-runtime.min.js

react-jsx-runtime.min.js

537 ms

deprecated.min.js

deprecated.min.js

537 ms

dom.min.js

dom.min.js

547 ms

escape-html.min.js

escape-html.min.js

544 ms

element.min.js

element.min.js

493 ms

is-shallow-equal.min.js

is-shallow-equal.min.js

507 ms

keycodes.min.js

keycodes.min.js

512 ms

priority-queue.min.js

priority-queue.min.js

495 ms

compose.min.js

compose.min.js

489 ms

private-apis.min.js

private-apis.min.js

498 ms

redux-routine.min.js

redux-routine.min.js

494 ms

data.min.js

data.min.js

508 ms

autoptimize_single_36878700722ad5c1f9c12d4c1c543977.js

autoptimize_single_36878700722ad5c1f9c12d4c1c543977.js

434 ms

url.min.js

url.min.js

451 ms

api-fetch.min.js

api-fetch.min.js

458 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

15 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

27 ms

autoptimize_single_178f4d3163b38b06e6b4a00d28fbb566.js

autoptimize_single_178f4d3163b38b06e6b4a00d28fbb566.js

466 ms

autoptimize_single_aa681f0ff1478919f02ae32c7a466bec.js

autoptimize_single_aa681f0ff1478919f02ae32c7a466bec.js

471 ms

data-controls.min.js

data-controls.min.js

492 ms

html-entities.min.js

html-entities.min.js

502 ms

notices.min.js

notices.min.js

516 ms

autoptimize_single_bdc1e466fc436dc223abbd653674f2ad.js

autoptimize_single_bdc1e466fc436dc223abbd653674f2ad.js

520 ms

autoptimize_single_3748756fed1fd4b5dd135f2faf47a3fd.js

autoptimize_single_3748756fed1fd4b5dd135f2faf47a3fd.js

565 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

493 ms

a11y.min.js

a11y.min.js

493 ms

primitives.min.js

primitives.min.js

499 ms

autoptimize_single_537006056dd96d88f5191204fb38e2db.js

autoptimize_single_537006056dd96d88f5191204fb38e2db.js

587 ms

autoptimize_single_505fce8711cc47daf2d944f62d9b0e99.js

autoptimize_single_505fce8711cc47daf2d944f62d9b0e99.js

476 ms

autoptimize_single_09a2bc6aaea00e614964e5cd5e09400a.js

autoptimize_single_09a2bc6aaea00e614964e5cd5e09400a.js

496 ms

RedSys-y-Bizum-Gateway-para-WooCommerce.png

RedSys-y-Bizum-Gateway-para-WooCommerce.png

651 ms

Logo.png

Logo.png

520 ms

rating_over.gif

rating_over.gif

586 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

26 ms

zxcvbn.min.js

zxcvbn.min.js

241 ms

Accessibility Review

codection.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

codection.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

codection.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ES

  • Language Claimed

    ES

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Codection.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Codection.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

codection.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Codection. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: