11 sec in total
112 ms
10.7 sec
242 ms
Click here to check amazing Codefire content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about codefire.in
CodeFire Technologies is a software development company with a difference! It takes full ownership of the project and does whatever it takes to deliver a successful project. We have team of expert PHP...
Visit codefire.inWe analyzed Codefire.in page load time and found that the first response time was 112 ms and then it took 10.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
codefire.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value28.3 s
0/100
10%
Value60.7 s
0/100
25%
Value62.8 s
0/100
10%
Value15,440 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.251
49/100
15%
Value84.9 s
0/100
10%
112 ms
2472 ms
584 ms
519 ms
496 ms
Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Codefire.in, 92% (72 requests) were made to Codefire.org and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.1 sec) relates to the external source Codefire.org.
Page size can be reduced by 672.9 kB (50%)
1.3 MB
663.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Codefire.in main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 627.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 29.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.3 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 25.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Codefire images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 431.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 431.8 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 185.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Codefire.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 185.9 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (62%)
74
28
The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Codefire. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 30 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
codefire.in
112 ms
codefire.org
2472 ms
modal.css
584 ms
k2.css
519 ms
widgetkit-36f9f448.css
496 ms
twitter.css
505 ms
mootools-core.js
491 ms
core.js
723 ms
modal.js
977 ms
jquery.min.js
25 ms
k2.noconflict.js
1181 ms
k2.js
992 ms
caption.js
1005 ms
jquery.js
839 ms
widgetkit-ffbfd925.js
1602 ms
mootools-more.js
1624 ms
base.css
2600 ms
extensions.css
1236 ms
tools.css
1270 ms
layout.css
2598 ms
menus.css
2605 ms
modules.css
2602 ms
system.css
3597 ms
abel.css
3600 ms
abel.css
3601 ms
abel.css
3599 ms
abel.css
3666 ms
responsive.css
3599 ms
print.css
4075 ms
custom.css
4083 ms
abel.css
4596 ms
warp.js
4598 ms
responsive.js
4595 ms
accordionmenu.js
4596 ms
dropdownmenu.js
4596 ms
template.js
4597 ms
script.js
5091 ms
search.js
5075 ms
lightbox.js
3955 ms
mediaelement-and-player.js
4481 ms
spotlight.js
3483 ms
tools.css
3446 ms
layout.css
2978 ms
base.css
2982 ms
modules.css
2977 ms
menus.css
2989 ms
system.css
2455 ms
system.css
2460 ms
system-all.css
2465 ms
responsive.css
2475 ms
print.css
2001 ms
layout.css
722 ms
Zg3aFycU_normal.png
203 ms
homeslider2.png
489 ms
cms.png
490 ms
web_design.png
496 ms
mobile_tec.png
496 ms
seo_tec.png
516 ms
twitter_bird.png
483 ms
fb.png
973 ms
twitter.png
991 ms
google.png
979 ms
logo.png
970 ms
7.png
981 ms
next.png
989 ms
prev.png
1452 ms
block-div-h.png
1449 ms
hr-dotted.png
1457 ms
abel-regular-webfont.woff
1477 ms
mod-block.png
1450 ms
user.png
1443 ms
nav.png
1906 ms
mod-dot.png
1917 ms
analytics.js
63 ms
,
42 ms
magnifier.png
1858 ms
back-to-top.png
1597 ms
collect
20 ms
codefire.in accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
codefire.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
codefire.in SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Codefire.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Codefire.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
codefire.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Codefire. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: