Tools & Wizards About Us
codemind.co.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 42

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    61% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

codemind.co.in

Codemind Technologies, Jodhpur and Bangalore | Web Design Company Bangalore, Web Design Bangalore, Web Designing Company Bangalore, Web Design Compani...

Page Load Speed

6.2 sec in total

First Response

492 ms

Resources Loaded

5.3 sec

Page Rendered

463 ms

codemind.co.in screenshot

About Website

Welcome to codemind.co.in homepage info - get ready to check Codemind best content right away, or after learning these important things about codemind.co.in

Codemind technologies, Codemind, Codemind Technologies jodhpur, Software development Company in jodhpur, Mobile Application Development in Jodhpur, Mobile App in Jodhpur, Android App Developemnt, Webs...

Visit codemind.co.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Codemind.co.in page load time and found that the first response time was 492 ms and then it took 5.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

codemind.co.in performance score

42

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

16/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.3 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.2 s

20/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value30 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.629

9/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.9 s

66/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

codemind.co.in

492 ms

codemind.co.in

1055 ms

animate.css

242 ms

bootstrap.css

484 ms

et-line-icons.css

699 ms

Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (65 requests) were addressed to the original Codemind.co.in, 7% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Codemind.co.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 121.7 kB (8%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Codemind.co.in main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 54.3 kB

  • Original 61.5 kB
  • After minification 37.2 kB
  • After compression 7.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 24.2 kB, which is 39% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 54.3 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 25.1 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Codemind images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 28.2 kB

  • Original 188.6 kB
  • After minification 188.6 kB
  • After compression 160.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 28.2 kB or 15% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 14.0 kB

  • Original 92.6 kB
  • After minification 92.6 kB
  • After compression 78.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Codemind.co.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 14.0 kB or 15% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (65%)

Requests Now

63

After Optimization

22

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Codemind. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

codemind.co.in

codemind.co.in

492 ms

codemind.co.in

codemind.co.in

1055 ms

animate.css

animate.css

242 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

484 ms

et-line-icons.css

et-line-icons.css

699 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

701 ms

extralayers.css

extralayers.css

727 ms

settings.css

settings.css

722 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

733 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

730 ms

owl.transitions.css

owl.transitions.css

931 ms

full-slider.css

full-slider.css

932 ms

text-effect.css

text-effect.css

963 ms

menu-hamburger.css

menu-hamburger.css

964 ms

style.css

style.css

971 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

967 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1396 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

1173 ms

bootstrap.js

bootstrap.js

1228 ms

bootstrap-hover-dropdown.js

bootstrap-hover-dropdown.js

1228 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

jquery.easing.1.3.js

1229 ms

skrollr.min.js

skrollr.min.js

1229 ms

smooth-scroll.js

smooth-scroll.js

1424 ms

jquery.appear.js

jquery.appear.js

1442 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

1442 ms

page-scroll.js

page-scroll.js

1444 ms

jquery.easypiechart.js

jquery.easypiechart.js

1444 ms

jquery.parallax-1.1.3.js

jquery.parallax-1.1.3.js

1626 ms

jquery.isotope.min.js

jquery.isotope.min.js

1641 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

1684 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

1686 ms

popup-gallery.js

popup-gallery.js

1689 ms

text-effect.js

text-effect.js

1685 ms

jquery.tools.min.js

jquery.tools.min.js

1863 ms

jquery.revolution.js

jquery.revolution.js

2106 ms

counter.js

counter.js

1924 ms

jquery.countTo.js

jquery.countTo.js

1926 ms

jquery.fitvids.js

jquery.fitvids.js

1924 ms

imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

1694 ms

classie.js

classie.js

1615 ms

hamburger-menu.js

hamburger-menu.js

1477 ms

main.js

main.js

1475 ms

logo-white.png

logo-white.png

1486 ms

logo-light.png

logo-light.png

1487 ms

arrow-pre.png

arrow-pre.png

1605 ms

arrow-next.png

arrow-next.png

1616 ms

logo-light-gray.png

logo-light-gray.png

1485 ms

Truecoders_horizontal.png

Truecoders_horizontal.png

1722 ms

css

css

22 ms

css

css

40 ms

css

css

44 ms

corporate-03.jpg

corporate-03.jpg

1629 ms

parallax-img45.jpg

parallax-img45.jpg

1393 ms

slide-bg3.jpg

slide-bg3.jpg

1542 ms

slide-bg4.jpg

slide-bg4.jpg

1554 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

8 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

15 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

53 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

52 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf

53 ms

fontawesome-webfonte0a5.woff

fontawesome-webfonte0a5.woff

1955 ms

et-line.woff

et-line.woff

1796 ms

slide-bg5.jpg

slide-bg5.jpg

1569 ms

slide-bg6.jpg

slide-bg6.jpg

1580 ms

slide-bg7.jpg

slide-bg7.jpg

1650 ms

slide-bg8.jpg

slide-bg8.jpg

1468 ms

buy-theme.png

buy-theme.png

835 ms

quick-question.png

quick-question.png

861 ms

icon-move-light.png

icon-move-light.png

928 ms

corporate-01.jpg

corporate-01.jpg

934 ms

corporate-02.jpg

corporate-02.jpg

1543 ms

slider-img1.jpg

slider-img1.jpg

1523 ms

slider-img2.jpg

slider-img2.jpg

1536 ms

Accessibility Review

codemind.co.in accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

codemind.co.in best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

codemind.co.in SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Codemind.co.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Codemind.co.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

codemind.co.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Codemind. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: