Tools & Wizards About Us
codenail.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 15

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    27% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

codenail.com

Codenail - Order a poster or shirt of your code in seconds!

Page Load Speed

6 sec in total

First Response

52 ms

Resources Loaded

3.3 sec

Page Rendered

2.6 sec

codenail.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to codenail.com homepage info - get ready to check Codenail best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about codenail.com

Create and order a code poster or shirt. We support many languages and themes, along with other awesome configurations. Printed on museum quality matte paper and framed in black.

Visit codenail.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Codenail.com page load time and found that the first response time was 52 ms and then it took 5.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

codenail.com performance score

15

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value10.9 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.1 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,680 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value25.5 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

codenail.com

52 ms

codenail.com

29 ms

css

43 ms

css

79 ms

main.6e62c9b6.css

175 ms

Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 8% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Codenail.com, 42% (22 requests) were made to S3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com and 23% (12 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) relates to the external source S3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 4.3 MB (31%)

Content Size

14.0 MB

After Optimization

9.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Codenail.com main page is 14.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 13.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 59.8 kB

  • Original 73.2 kB
  • After minification 70.7 kB
  • After compression 13.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 59.8 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-31%

Potential reduce by 4.3 MB

  • Original 13.9 MB
  • After minification 9.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Codenail needs image optimization as it can save up to 4.3 MB or 31% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 50 B

  • Original 21.0 kB
  • After minification 21.0 kB
  • After compression 20.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 89 B

  • Original 3.1 kB
  • After minification 3.1 kB
  • After compression 3.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Codenail.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (21%)

Requests Now

48

After Optimization

38

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Codenail. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

codenail.com

codenail.com

52 ms

codenail.com

codenail.com

29 ms

css

css

43 ms

css

css

79 ms

main.6e62c9b6.css

main.6e62c9b6.css

175 ms

main.a3e4c564.js

main.a3e4c564.js

216 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

109 ms

hotjar-565014.js

hotjar-565014.js

1029 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

134 ms

collect

collect

342 ms

1p.png

1p.png

796 ms

1s.png

1s.png

956 ms

2p.png

2p.png

637 ms

2s.png

2s.png

899 ms

3p.png

3p.png

2121 ms

3s.png

3s.png

1011 ms

4p.png

4p.png

820 ms

4s.png

4s.png

1060 ms

5p.png

5p.png

979 ms

5s.png

5s.png

1138 ms

6p.png

6p.png

1102 ms

6s.png

6s.png

1171 ms

1.JPG

1.JPG

1174 ms

2.JPG

2.JPG

1200 ms

3.JPG

3.JPG

1300 ms

4.JPG

4.JPG

1268 ms

5.JPG

5.JPG

1298 ms

6.JPG

6.JPG

1309 ms

1s.JPG

1s.JPG

1380 ms

2s.JPG

2s.JPG

1388 ms

3s.JPG

3s.JPG

1413 ms

4s.JPG

4s.JPG

1444 ms

1977610972483944

1977610972483944

91 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

233 ms

qkBIXvYC6trAT55ZBi1ueQVIjQTD-JqaE0lM.woff

qkBIXvYC6trAT55ZBi1ueQVIjQTD-JqaE0lM.woff

63 ms

qkBIXvYC6trAT55ZBi1ueQVIjQTDH52aE0lM.woff

qkBIXvYC6trAT55ZBi1ueQVIjQTDH52aE0lM.woff

90 ms

modules.cbd9768ba80ba0be5b17.js

modules.cbd9768ba80ba0be5b17.js

59 ms

box-69edcc3187336f9b0a3fbb4c73be9fe6.html

box-69edcc3187336f9b0a3fbb4c73be9fe6.html

120 ms

visit-data

visit-data

467 ms

widget_iframe.7dae38096d06923d683a2a807172322a.html

widget_iframe.7dae38096d06923d683a2a807172322a.html

186 ms

settings

settings

124 ms

tweet.495a42551da1e5c4c5171224e18a5a07.js

tweet.495a42551da1e5c4c5171224e18a5a07.js

23 ms

Tweet.html

Tweet.html

23 ms

Tweet.html

Tweet.html

48 ms

Tweet.html

Tweet.html

114 ms

Tweet.html

Tweet.html

147 ms

Tweet.html

Tweet.html

136 ms

Tweet.html

Tweet.html

149 ms

embed.runtime.8a84349b69f78c533972.js

embed.runtime.8a84349b69f78c533972.js

129 ms

embed.8601.e33219e82c67975cfd90.js

embed.8601.e33219e82c67975cfd90.js

174 ms

embed.Tweet.c69f27d562a9c1a5cdbc.js

embed.Tweet.c69f27d562a9c1a5cdbc.js

130 ms

collect

collect

22 ms

Accessibility Review

codenail.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best Practices

codenail.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

codenail.com SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Codenail.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Codenail.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

codenail.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Codenail. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: