5.2 sec in total
405 ms
3.9 sec
888 ms
Visit codepedia.info now to see the best up-to-date Codepedia content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about codepedia.info
Codepedia.info a place to learn web development, Articles on Asp.net, Asp.net Core, C#, csharp dot net tutorial, Angular, JavaScript, jQuery, SQL, EntityFramework Core and some web tools.
Visit codepedia.infoWe analyzed Codepedia.info page load time and found that the first response time was 405 ms and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
codepedia.info performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.4 s
71/100
10%
Value2.4 s
91/100
25%
Value4.1 s
80/100
10%
Value200 ms
90/100
30%
Value0.216
57/100
15%
Value7.0 s
53/100
10%
405 ms
980 ms
49 ms
72 ms
53 ms
Our browser made a total of 24 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 58% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Codepedia.info, 13% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 13% (3 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Codepedia.info.
Page size can be reduced by 248.9 kB (15%)
1.7 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Codepedia.info main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 88.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 88.4 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 107.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Codepedia images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 8.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 44.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Codepedia.info needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 44.6 kB or 55% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (42%)
19
11
The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Codepedia. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
codepedia.info
405 ms
codepedia.info
980 ms
css2
49 ms
js
72 ms
cse.js
53 ms
jquery.min.js
376 ms
bootstrap.min.js
746 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrFJM.woff
34 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9V1g.woff
62 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7V1g.woff
70 ms
cse_element__en.js
40 ms
default+en.css
66 ms
default.css
68 ms
async-ads.js
25 ms
site.min.css
375 ms
js-web-development_638351097401594078.png
555 ms
interpolated-strings-csharp_638301380030586018.png
1110 ms
exists-vs-any-chsarp_638299597177245482.png
1298 ms
recover-iphone-data_638280792220008878.png
1159 ms
bouncing-gif_638250215892375413_638280777746633757.png
1306 ms
string-vs-stringbuilder_638167512679130952.jpg
938 ms
Box-side2-details_638226449466392475.jpeg
740 ms
asp-net-core-interview-question-answer_637798606260724703.jpg
926 ms
refresh-JWT-token-aspnet-core_637778825595676757.jpg
1112 ms
codepedia.info accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
codepedia.info best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
codepedia.info SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Codepedia.info can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Codepedia.info main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
codepedia.info
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Codepedia. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: