Tools & Wizards About Us
codetable.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 50

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    68% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

codetable.net

Code Table - Alt Codes, Ascii Codes, Entities In Html, Unicode Characters, and Unicode Groups

Page Load Speed

909 ms in total

First Response

57 ms

Resources Loaded

684 ms

Page Rendered

168 ms

codetable.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Code Table content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about codetable.net

Code Table - Alt Codes, Ascii Codes, Entities In Html, Unicode Characters, and Unicode Groups and Categories

Visit codetable.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Codetable.net page load time and found that the first response time was 57 ms and then it took 852 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

codetable.net performance score

50

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

45/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

72/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.3 s

75/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,810 ms

9/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.8 s

22/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

codetable.net

57 ms

codetable.net

40 ms

www.codetable.net

316 ms

Styles.css

222 ms

btn_donate_LG.gif

19 ms

Our browser made a total of 14 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 43% of them (6 requests) were addressed to the original Codetable.net, 14% (2 requests) were made to Paypalobjects.com and 14% (2 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (316 ms) belongs to the original domain Codetable.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 24.5 kB (41%)

Content Size

59.6 kB

After Optimization

35.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Codetable.net main page is 59.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 29.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 24.3 kB

  • Original 29.1 kB
  • After minification 27.9 kB
  • After compression 4.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.3 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 484 B
  • After minification 484 B

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Code Table images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 146 B

  • Original 28.6 kB
  • After minification 28.6 kB
  • After compression 28.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 14 B

  • Original 1.4 kB
  • After minification 1.4 kB
  • After compression 1.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Codetable.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (27%)

Requests Now

11

After Optimization

8

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 11 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Code Table. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

codetable.net

codetable.net

57 ms

codetable.net

codetable.net

40 ms

www.codetable.net

www.codetable.net

316 ms

Styles.css

Styles.css

222 ms

btn_donate_LG.gif

btn_donate_LG.gif

19 ms

like.php

like.php

218 ms

tweet_button.html

tweet_button.html

117 ms

rocket-loader.min.js

rocket-loader.min.js

35 ms

pixel.gif

pixel.gif

17 ms

embeds

embeds

96 ms

AcAvebb33yC.js

AcAvebb33yC.js

38 ms

gWpQpSsEGQ-.png

gWpQpSsEGQ-.png

16 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

17 ms

main.js

main.js

12 ms

Accessibility Review

codetable.net accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

codetable.net best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

codetable.net SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EL

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Codetable.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Greek is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Codetable.net main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

codetable.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Code Table. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: