4.1 sec in total
354 ms
2.4 sec
1.3 sec
Click here to check amazing Codiscope content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about codiscope.com
Visit codiscope.comWe analyzed Codiscope.com page load time and found that the first response time was 354 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
codiscope.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.1 s
3/100
10%
Value11.2 s
0/100
25%
Value22.3 s
0/100
10%
Value66,640 ms
0/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value87.5 s
0/100
10%
354 ms
175 ms
72 ms
172 ms
657 ms
Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Codiscope.com, 13% (7 requests) were made to Cdn.cookielaw.org and 7% (4 requests) were made to Images.synopsys.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (798 ms) relates to the external source Images.synopsys.com.
Page size can be reduced by 219.9 kB (62%)
356.9 kB
137.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Codiscope.com main page is 356.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. HTML takes 251.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 210.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 26.6 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 210.4 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 642 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Codiscope images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 8.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 8.7 kB or 33% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 128 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Codiscope.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (39%)
46
28
The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Codiscope. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
training.html
354 ms
otSDKStub.js
175 ms
geo_v3.js
72 ms
CoveoFullSearch.min.css
172 ms
launch-44cc9b8559b8.min.js
657 ms
custom-jquery.min.d427b76f1da5b9be60fc42345f4e465a.js
571 ms
core.wcm.components.commons.datalayer.v1.min.904d3c2f1e821ab45124d66de422b409.js
148 ms
synopsys-headlibs.min.dd33e2e07ea036edd0b5f2aeff32f665.js
570 ms
synopsys-pagelibs.min.5e85d5f8c155f501a02ed2c2c95915b2.css
582 ms
jquery.cookie.min.js
567 ms
synopsys-logo-color.svg
565 ms
sig-facets-hero-polaris-general
786 ms
CoveoJsSearch.Lazy.min.js
563 ms
en.js
561 ms
coveo-search-enhanced-pipeline-context.min.34574be3e088165625ee78e2582a49bb.js
164 ms
synopsys-pagelibs.min.54193d570e048b94ad2ee3b9502fe5d3.js
571 ms
dataLayer.min.f0c0fa26abd6224f51cff303f02adb6f.js
571 ms
purple-facet-banner-1900x500
798 ms
play-button-arrow-sm.svg
569 ms
icon-sig-elearning.svg
569 ms
training-icon.svg
617 ms
security-champions.svg
587 ms
academy.svg
670 ms
training-options-outlined.svg
593 ms
icon-sig-elearning.svg
585 ms
icon-compliance.svg
591 ms
icon-sig-devsecops.svg
602 ms
icon-sig-architecture-and-design.svg
690 ms
frontend%2Bbackend.svg
599 ms
icon-sig-mobile-application-security.svg
644 ms
icon-sig-secure-cloud-migration.svg
667 ms
security-champions.svg
666 ms
integrate-security-training.svg
786 ms
academy.svg
790 ms
coverity-icon.svg
790 ms
black-duck-icon.svg
780 ms
seeker-icon.svg
782 ms
defensics-icon.svg
779 ms
synopsys-logo-color.svg
795 ms
c3922e14-e9c5-45ad-af19-28880fac108e.json
411 ms
css
145 ms
location
204 ms
otBannerSdk.js
26 ms
NF6LE-XXX7A-MEUWY-9UVCB-RT7NF
109 ms
en.json
14 ms
Roboto-Light.ttf
634 ms
Roboto-Regular.ttf
106 ms
Roboto-Medium.ttf
108 ms
Roboto-Bold.ttf
763 ms
sig-facets-hero-polaris-general
228 ms
purple-facet-banner-1900x500
509 ms
Citi-logo.png
129 ms
otFloatingFlat.json
385 ms
otPcTab.json
386 ms
otCommonStyles.css
395 ms
index.min.js
261 ms
codiscope.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
codiscope.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
codiscope.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Codiscope.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Codiscope.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
codiscope.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Codiscope. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: