5.8 sec in total
565 ms
4.9 sec
362 ms
Welcome to cofit.com homepage info - get ready to check Cofit best content right away, or after learning these important things about cofit.com
Research, engineering, manufacturing and distribution of automatic/continuous screen changers for clean, post-consumer, post-industrial plastic materials
Visit cofit.comWe analyzed Cofit.com page load time and found that the first response time was 565 ms and then it took 5.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
cofit.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
20/100
10%
Value6.8 s
7/100
25%
Value8.5 s
18/100
10%
Value1,410 ms
15/100
30%
Value0.42
23/100
15%
Value13.4 s
11/100
10%
565 ms
178 ms
996 ms
71 ms
346 ms
Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Cofit.com, 14% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Cofit.com.
Page size can be reduced by 95.0 kB (16%)
609.6 kB
514.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Cofit.com main page is 609.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 342.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 90.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 90.6 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Cofit needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.0 kB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 2.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 1.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cofit.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (82%)
57
10
The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cofit. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
cofit.com
565 ms
all.css
178 ms
font-awesome.min.css
996 ms
js
71 ms
style.min.css
346 ms
classic-themes.min.css
347 ms
styles.css
348 ms
js_composer.min.css
555 ms
xstore.min.css
453 ms
wpb.min.css
455 ms
back-top.min.css
455 ms
mobile-panel.min.css
455 ms
contact-forms.min.css
563 ms
kirki-styles.css
562 ms
jquery.min.js
677 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
572 ms
search.min.css
658 ms
ajax-search.min.css
667 ms
menu.min.css
666 ms
off-canvas.min.css
676 ms
mobile-menu.min.css
1027 ms
toggles-by-arrow.min.css
1027 ms
flexslider.css
1028 ms
public.css
1028 ms
v4-shims.min.css
1028 ms
all.min.css
1035 ms
blog-global.min.css
1037 ms
index.js
1033 ms
index.js
1033 ms
api.js
61 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
1036 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
1206 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
1207 ms
index.js
1205 ms
comment-reply.min.js
1204 ms
imagesLoaded.js
1206 ms
jquery.lazyload.js
1253 ms
etheme-scripts.min.js
1254 ms
swiper.min.js
1354 ms
tabs.min.js
1252 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
921 ms
ajaxSearch.min.js
1038 ms
mobileMenu.min.js
1038 ms
menu-item-on-touch.min.js
936 ms
jquery.flexslider.min.js
931 ms
script.min.js
929 ms
mobilePanel.min.js
1018 ms
back-top.min.js
930 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
630 ms
embed
296 ms
logo-bianco-150.png
484 ms
lazy.png
485 ms
xstore-placeholder-1x1.png
575 ms
xstore-placeholder-178x100.png
617 ms
drag.png
617 ms
xstore-placeholder-300x300.png
618 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aXx-p7K4GLs.woff
42 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw3aXx-p7K4GLvztg.woff
77 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw2aXx-p7K4GLvztg.woff
176 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw9aXx-p7K4GLvztg.woff
180 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw0aXx-p7K4GLvztg.woff
174 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrcVIT9d4cw.woff
100 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCGPrcVIT9d4cydYA.woff
180 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCHPrcVIT9d4cydYA.woff
179 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCMPrcVIT9d4cydYA.woff
181 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCFPrcVIT9d4cydYA.woff
182 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
98 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
179 ms
xstore-icons-light.ttf
573 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
181 ms
recaptcha__en.js
62 ms
js
48 ms
bg_direction_nav.png
110 ms
cofit.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
cofit.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
cofit.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cofit.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cofit.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
cofit.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Cofit. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: