2.6 sec in total
267 ms
1.7 sec
656 ms
Click here to check amazing Cogmat content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about cogmat.in
Visit cogmat.inWe analyzed Cogmat.in page load time and found that the first response time was 267 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
cogmat.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
48/100
10%
Value4.4 s
40/100
25%
Value5.1 s
62/100
10%
Value60 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.203
61/100
15%
Value7.2 s
50/100
10%
267 ms
179 ms
160 ms
172 ms
198 ms
Our browser made a total of 86 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (75 requests) were addressed to the original Cogmat.in, 8% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (832 ms) belongs to the original domain Cogmat.in.
Page size can be reduced by 613.3 kB (30%)
2.1 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Cogmat.in main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 44.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.8 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 44.9 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 164.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Cogmat needs image optimization as it can save up to 164.8 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 206.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 206.3 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 197.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cogmat.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 197.3 kB or 66% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (33%)
70
47
The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cogmat. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
cogmat.in
267 ms
css
179 ms
css(1)
160 ms
reset.css
172 ms
bootstrap.css
198 ms
flexslider.css
184 ms
font-awesome.css
178 ms
font-awesome.css
390 ms
prettyPhoto.css
242 ms
custom-fonts.css
265 ms
fontello.css
411 ms
style.css
294 ms
theme.css
368 ms
shortcodes.css
300 ms
media.css
301 ms
analytics.js
396 ms
jquery.js
516 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
368 ms
jquery.fittext.js
376 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
485 ms
rnr_plugins.js
552 ms
selectnav.min.js
485 ms
formvalidation.js
495 ms
scripts.js
495 ms
shortcodes.js
550 ms
css
25 ms
css
36 ms
analytics.js
81 ms
collect
58 ms
loading.gif
197 ms
logo2.png
198 ms
selectmenu.png
199 ms
slide1.png
341 ms
slide2.png
461 ms
slide3.png
614 ms
arrow_left.png
232 ms
arrow_right.png
256 ms
loader.gif
269 ms
Untitled-1-370x241.png
537 ms
VJ-370x241.png
495 ms
opt2-370x241.png
669 ms
Quick-Heal-Logo.jpg
415 ms
mufti.jpg
491 ms
Angel-Broking-Logo1.jpg
546 ms
intercontinental-logo.jpg
604 ms
logo_mahindra_rise.jpg
587 ms
icici-lombard-logos.jpg
626 ms
Vijay-Sales.jpg
642 ms
provouge.jpg
661 ms
Chambor_Geneva_logo.jpg
677 ms
We-School-logo.jpg
700 ms
euro-kids-logo.jpg
709 ms
timeout-logo.jpg
710 ms
fp-logo.jpg
765 ms
Oxemberg-Logo.png
734 ms
benzer-logo.jpg
745 ms
The-Resort-logo.jpg
766 ms
GEM-logo.jpg
783 ms
jk-logo.png
735 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
25 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
14 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
14 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
14 ms
Novecentowide-Medium-webfont.woff
832 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
171 ms
icomoon.woff
170 ms
icomoons.ttf
171 ms
Y_TKV6o8WovbUd3m_X9aAA.ttf
23 ms
HqHm7BVC_nzzTui2lzQTDaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
13 ms
bH7276GfdCjMjApa_dkG6aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
33 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
751 ms
Novecentowide-DemiBold-webfont.woff
781 ms
icomoon.woff
754 ms
icomoons.ttf
747 ms
logo_oberoi.jpg
676 ms
Trident-Logo-.jpg
718 ms
Turtle-Logo-1.jpg
729 ms
RelianceDigitalLogo.jpg
737 ms
FUTURE-GEN.png
723 ms
J.HAMPSTEAD.png
696 ms
SVC_bank.png
689 ms
KLM.png
656 ms
SIYARAMS.png
585 ms
SODEXO.png
566 ms
plus_minus.png
528 ms
mail.png
542 ms
cogmat.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
cogmat.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
cogmat.in SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cogmat.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Cogmat.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
cogmat.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Cogmat. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: