Tools & Wizards About Us
coletum.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 53

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    70% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

coletum.com

Coletum

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

65 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

60 ms

coletum.com screenshot

About Website

Visit coletum.com now to see the best up-to-date Coletum content for Brazil and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about coletum.com

Crie formulários, colete e processe dados de forma veloz e eficiente. Conheça uma ferramenta inteligente, multifuncional e totalmente digital. Acesse!

Visit coletum.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Coletum.com page load time and found that the first response time was 65 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

coletum.com performance score

53

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

46/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

71/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.1 s

93/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,120 ms

23/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.082

94/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.8 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

coletum.com

65 ms

coletum.com

169 ms

107 ms

www.web.coletum.com

226 ms

minified.js

44 ms

Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Coletum.com, 42% (25 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com and 25% (15 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (692 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 706.1 kB (54%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

594.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Coletum.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 732.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 593.8 kB

  • Original 732.9 kB
  • After minification 731.0 kB
  • After compression 139.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 593.8 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 64.2 kB

  • Original 278.5 kB
  • After minification 214.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Coletum needs image optimization as it can save up to 64.2 kB or 23% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 48.1 kB

  • Original 289.4 kB
  • After minification 289.4 kB
  • After compression 241.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 48.1 kB or 17% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (21%)

Requests Now

53

After Optimization

42

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Coletum. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

coletum.com

coletum.com

65 ms

coletum.com

coletum.com

169 ms

107 ms

www.web.coletum.com

www.web.coletum.com

226 ms

minified.js

minified.js

44 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

40 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

35 ms

thunderbolt-commons.8add2233.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.8add2233.bundle.min.js

24 ms

main.1550a9c2.bundle.min.js

main.1550a9c2.bundle.min.js

151 ms

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

147 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

150 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

148 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

151 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

161 ms

8ad8be7c-0841-443d-9db9-13786a7222bc-loader.js

8ad8be7c-0841-443d-9db9-13786a7222bc-loader.js

489 ms

COLETUM_LOGO%20FUNDO%20ESCURO.png

COLETUM_LOGO%20FUNDO%20ESCURO.png

189 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

67 ms

3050c7_961fcbbc9f2a499f8f87aacf47c829b7~mv2.png

3050c7_961fcbbc9f2a499f8f87aacf47c829b7~mv2.png

190 ms

3050c7_8d16eb3478f6401480346fbe0e40f1a7~mv2.png

3050c7_8d16eb3478f6401480346fbe0e40f1a7~mv2.png

171 ms

1.png

1.png

172 ms

2.png

2.png

190 ms

3.png

3.png

191 ms

4.png

4.png

251 ms

5.png

5.png

301 ms

Layer%20142.png

Layer%20142.png

291 ms

3050c7_edd7c517037a4e83a0b4a3beb8f5ff5a~mv2.png

3050c7_edd7c517037a4e83a0b4a3beb8f5ff5a~mv2.png

321 ms

3050c7_27a8fe93678747568c6c5d2671fdc8a3~mv2.png

3050c7_27a8fe93678747568c6c5d2671fdc8a3~mv2.png

322 ms

3050c7_038cc196efe24fd38bf6e39d5e7edf5a~mv2.png

3050c7_038cc196efe24fd38bf6e39d5e7edf5a~mv2.png

326 ms

3050c7_5758f1fc5fcc47e09e6622481b4120aa~mv2.png

3050c7_5758f1fc5fcc47e09e6622481b4120aa~mv2.png

420 ms

3050c7_445afc1e0d5b404da7b21f1be49dece4~mv2.png

3050c7_445afc1e0d5b404da7b21f1be49dece4~mv2.png

436 ms

5bd961_5eb77fb753af47dea5f1df21e5e9d038~mv2.webp

5bd961_5eb77fb753af47dea5f1df21e5e9d038~mv2.webp

446 ms

5bd961_5eb77fb753af47dea5f1df21e5e9d038~mv2.webp

5bd961_5eb77fb753af47dea5f1df21e5e9d038~mv2.webp

440 ms

3050c7_9739d244a68448f6825439203fba78ce~mv2.webp

3050c7_9739d244a68448f6825439203fba78ce~mv2.webp

457 ms

3050c7_9739d244a68448f6825439203fba78ce~mv2.webp

3050c7_9739d244a68448f6825439203fba78ce~mv2.webp

476 ms

3050c7_f9d5ac81f2ed444eaa4a3403eca04e97~mv2.webp

3050c7_f9d5ac81f2ed444eaa4a3403eca04e97~mv2.webp

584 ms

3050c7_f9d5ac81f2ed444eaa4a3403eca04e97~mv2.webp

3050c7_f9d5ac81f2ed444eaa4a3403eca04e97~mv2.webp

564 ms

3050c7_d1e44b57995e4ff99b0224195505335b~mv2.png

3050c7_d1e44b57995e4ff99b0224195505335b~mv2.png

619 ms

3050c7_f4f561b630f044df8e91eb3908f66a1c~mv2.png

3050c7_f4f561b630f044df8e91eb3908f66a1c~mv2.png

591 ms

3050c7_b3f87eaaf585466fbd537ec7d3879364~mv2.png

3050c7_b3f87eaaf585466fbd537ec7d3879364~mv2.png

604 ms

3050c7_d1801a3fb0bb4ae59081c002f3f9df80~mv2.png

3050c7_d1801a3fb0bb4ae59081c002f3f9df80~mv2.png

625 ms

COLETUM_V%20FUNDO%20CLARO.png

COLETUM_V%20FUNDO%20CLARO.png

692 ms

117 ms

118 ms

119 ms

114 ms

113 ms

115 ms

150 ms

159 ms

157 ms

153 ms

152 ms

151 ms

deprecation-pt.v5.html

deprecation-pt.v5.html

5 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

23 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

5 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

16 ms

WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff

WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff

3 ms

WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff

WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff

6 ms

WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff

WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff

7 ms

Accessibility Review

coletum.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

coletum.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

coletum.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    PT

  • Language Claimed

    PT

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Coletum.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Portuguese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Coletum.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

coletum.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Coletum. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: