Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 45

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 19% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

Page Load Speed

6.2 sec in total

First Response

257 ms

Resources Loaded

5.6 sec

Page Rendered

293 ms

colorfilth.com screenshot

About Website

Visit colorfilth.com now to see the best up-to-date Colorfilth content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about colorfilth.com

Black Stag Inc. is a boutique creative agency based out of Venice, California. We create comprehensive interactive projects, branding, and promotional campaigns for high-end entertainment, social medi...

Visit colorfilth.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Colorfilth.com page load time and found that the first response time was 257 ms and then it took 5.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

colorfilth.com performance score

0

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.176

68/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

colorfilth.com

257 ms

www.colorfilth.com

249 ms

blackstaginc

151 ms

blackstaginc

50 ms

cargo.jquery.package.js

121 ms

Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Colorfilth.com, 34% (15 requests) were made to Cargocollective.com and 11% (5 requests) were made to Payload33.cargocollective.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.8 sec) relates to the external source Desert.blackstaginc.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 474.5 kB (16%)

Content Size

3.0 MB

After Optimization

2.5 MB

In fact, the total size of Colorfilth.com main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 16.7 kB

  • Original 21.3 kB
  • After minification 21.3 kB
  • After compression 4.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.7 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 28.2 kB

  • Original 2.4 MB
  • After minification 2.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Colorfilth images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 373.4 kB

  • Original 496.3 kB
  • After minification 366.8 kB
  • After compression 122.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 373.4 kB or 75% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 56.2 kB

  • Original 65.5 kB
  • After minification 43.4 kB
  • After compression 9.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Colorfilth.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 56.2 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (34%)

Requests Now

35

After Optimization

23

The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Colorfilth. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

colorfilth.com accessibility score

45

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

colorfilth.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

colorfilth.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Colorfilth.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Colorfilth.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Colorfilth. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: