Tools & Wizards About Us
colorpak.co.id screenshot

Report Summary

  • 60

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    75% of other websites

  • 68

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 33% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

colorpak.co.id

PT COLORPAK INDONESIA,Tbk - Home

Page Load Speed

16 sec in total

First Response

759 ms

Resources Loaded

15.1 sec

Page Rendered

154 ms

colorpak.co.id screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing COLORPAK content for Indonesia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about colorpak.co.id

PT COLORPAK INDONESIA,Tbk

Visit colorpak.co.id

Key Findings

We analyzed Colorpak.co.id page load time and found that the first response time was 759 ms and then it took 15.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

colorpak.co.id performance score

60

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

49/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value22.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.3 s

13/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value50 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.011

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.6 s

91/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

colorpak.co.id

759 ms

colorpak.co.id

1121 ms

templates.jux_ciao.less.bootstrap.less.css

258 ms

system.css

513 ms

plugins.system.t3.base-bs3.less.t3.less.css

740 ms

Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 99% of them (71 requests) were addressed to the original Colorpak.co.id, 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (10.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Colorpak.co.id.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (29%)

Content Size

4.2 MB

After Optimization

2.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Colorpak.co.id main page is 4.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 39.1 kB

  • Original 46.5 kB
  • After minification 44.0 kB
  • After compression 7.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 39.1 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-30%

Potential reduce by 1.2 MB

  • Original 3.9 MB
  • After minification 2.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, COLORPAK needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 30% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 8.5 kB

  • Original 127.0 kB
  • After minification 126.8 kB
  • After compression 118.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 7.5 kB

  • Original 72.9 kB
  • After minification 72.9 kB
  • After compression 65.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Colorpak.co.id has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (70%)

Requests Now

69

After Optimization

21

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 69 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of COLORPAK. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 31 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

colorpak.co.id

colorpak.co.id

759 ms

colorpak.co.id

colorpak.co.id

1121 ms

templates.jux_ciao.less.bootstrap.less.css

templates.jux_ciao.less.bootstrap.less.css

258 ms

system.css

system.css

513 ms

plugins.system.t3.base-bs3.less.t3.less.css

plugins.system.t3.base-bs3.less.t3.less.css

740 ms

templates.jux_ciao.less.core.less.css

templates.jux_ciao.less.core.less.css

760 ms

templates.jux_ciao.less.forms.less.css

templates.jux_ciao.less.forms.less.css

761 ms

templates.jux_ciao.less.navigation-core.less.css

templates.jux_ciao.less.navigation-core.less.css

762 ms

templates.jux_ciao.less.navigation.less.css

templates.jux_ciao.less.navigation.less.css

760 ms

templates.jux_ciao.less.modules.less.css

templates.jux_ciao.less.modules.less.css

766 ms

templates.jux_ciao.less.noo_accordion_slider.less.css

templates.jux_ciao.less.noo_accordion_slider.less.css

988 ms

templates.jux_ciao.less.noo_login.less.css

templates.jux_ciao.less.noo_login.less.css

1015 ms

templates.jux_ciao.less.joomla.less.css

templates.jux_ciao.less.joomla.less.css

1013 ms

templates.jux_ciao.less.typo.less.css

templates.jux_ciao.less.typo.less.css

1014 ms

templates.jux_ciao.less.jux_resmenu.less.css

templates.jux_ciao.less.jux_resmenu.less.css

1012 ms

templates.jux_ciao.less.style.less.css

templates.jux_ciao.less.style.less.css

1020 ms

templates.jux_ciao.less.k2.less.css

templates.jux_ciao.less.k2.less.css

1236 ms

templates.jux_ciao.less.navigation-responsive.less.css

templates.jux_ciao.less.navigation-responsive.less.css

1264 ms

templates.jux_ciao.less.joomla-responsive.less.css

templates.jux_ciao.less.joomla-responsive.less.css

1267 ms

templates.jux_ciao.less.typo-responsive.less.css

templates.jux_ciao.less.typo-responsive.less.css

1268 ms

templates.jux_ciao.less.style-responsive.less.css

templates.jux_ciao.less.style-responsive.less.css

1267 ms

plugins.system.t3.base-bs3.less.megamenu.less.css

plugins.system.t3.base-bs3.less.megamenu.less.css

1482 ms

templates.jux_ciao.less.megamenu.less.css

templates.jux_ciao.less.megamenu.less.css

1519 ms

plugins.system.t3.base-bs3.less.off-canvas.less.css

plugins.system.t3.base-bs3.less.off-canvas.less.css

1521 ms

templates.jux_ciao.less.off-canvas.less.css

templates.jux_ciao.less.off-canvas.less.css

1520 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

1522 ms

settings.css

settings.css

1528 ms

dynamic-captions.css

dynamic-captions.css

1730 ms

static-captions.css

static-captions.css

1774 ms

style.css

style.css

1774 ms

template.css

template.css

1776 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

2037 ms

jquery-noconflict.js

jquery-noconflict.js

1787 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

1978 ms

k2.frontend.js

k2.frontend.js

2027 ms

caption.js

caption.js

2026 ms

css

css

19 ms

bootstrap.js

bootstrap.js

2283 ms

jquery.tap.min.js

jquery.tap.min.js

1784 ms

system.css

system.css

1718 ms

off-canvas.js

off-canvas.js

1546 ms

script.js

script.js

1525 ms

menu.js

menu.js

1534 ms

script.js

script.js

1537 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

1965 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

2028 ms

script.js

script.js

1551 ms

bg_repeat.png

bg_repeat.png

302 ms

kantor.jpg

kantor.jpg

2535 ms

bg_no-repeat.png

bg_no-repeat.png

1768 ms

logo.png

logo.png

260 ms

home-eng2.png

home-eng2.png

253 ms

id.gif

id.gif

258 ms

en.gif

en.gif

259 ms

tinta.jpg

tinta.jpg

1262 ms

gc.jpg

gc.jpg

992 ms

ink-colorpak.jpg

ink-colorpak.jpg

1521 ms

slide-colorpak-2.jpg

slide-colorpak-2.jpg

1770 ms

product-ink.jpg

product-ink.jpg

512 ms

product-film.jpg

product-film.jpg

1018 ms

product-Adhesive.jpg

product-Adhesive.jpg

1240 ms

transparent.png

transparent.png

1272 ms

dispencing.jpg

dispencing.jpg

3045 ms

racking.jpg

racking.jpg

10376 ms

border-gradient.png

border-gradient.png

1463 ms

loader.gif

loader.gif

1448 ms

bullet.png

bullet.png

1457 ms

large_left.png

large_left.png

1664 ms

large_right.png

large_right.png

1703 ms

small_left.png

small_left.png

1703 ms

small_right.png

small_right.png

1709 ms

revicons.woff

revicons.woff

682 ms

Accessibility Review

colorpak.co.id accessibility score

68

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

colorpak.co.id best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

colorpak.co.id SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Colorpak.co.id can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Colorpak.co.id main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

colorpak.co.id

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of COLORPAK. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: