566 ms in total
28 ms
463 ms
75 ms
Visit colorpicker.me now to see the best up-to-date Color Picker content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about colorpicker.me
An online color picker tool
Visit colorpicker.meWe analyzed Colorpicker.me page load time and found that the first response time was 28 ms and then it took 538 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.
colorpicker.me performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.9 s
88/100
10%
Value3.0 s
79/100
25%
Value2.2 s
99/100
10%
Value210 ms
88/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value4.5 s
82/100
10%
28 ms
78 ms
221 ms
276 ms
277 ms
Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 38% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Colorpicker.me, 38% (12 requests) were made to Ezojs.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (277 ms) relates to the external source Ezojs.com.
Page size can be reduced by 24.7 kB (19%)
127.6 kB
102.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Colorpicker.me main page is 127.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 92.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 22.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.8 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 88 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Color Picker images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 156 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Colorpicker.me has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (69%)
29
9
The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Color Picker. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
colorpicker.me
28 ms
colorpicker.me
78 ms
boise.js
221 ms
abilene.js
276 ms
et.js
277 ms
css
32 ms
stylesheet.css
38 ms
js
140 ms
jquery.js
65 ms
jquery-mousewheel.js
47 ms
cookie.js
53 ms
tinycolor.js
59 ms
colorpicker.js
61 ms
v.js
215 ms
ezoic.png
234 ms
drake.js
180 ms
jellyfish.js
180 ms
sv-map.png
47 ms
sv-reticule.gif
87 ms
hue-map.png
81 ms
hue-reticule.gif
47 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
46 ms
js
47 ms
analytics.js
16 ms
collect
57 ms
mulvane.js
39 ms
wichita.js
43 ms
raleigh.js
74 ms
vista.js
41 ms
olathe.js
34 ms
vitals.js
36 ms
chanute.js
41 ms
colorpicker.me accessibility score
colorpicker.me best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
colorpicker.me SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Colorpicker.me can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Colorpicker.me main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
colorpicker.me
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Color Picker. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: