Tools & Wizards About Us
com-port-monitoring.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 65

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    78% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

com-port-monitoring.com

Serial Port Monitor | FREE Serial Port Monitor [for Windows]

Page Load Speed

3 sec in total

First Response

334 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

570 ms

com-port-monitoring.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Com Port Monitor Ing content for Ukraine. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about com-port-monitoring.com

FREE Serial Monitor lets you record RS232 data into a text file and test serial communication between COM devices and applications. Download for free Serial Port Monitor and try advanced features.

Visit com-port-monitoring.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Com-port-monitoring.com page load time and found that the first response time was 334 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

com-port-monitoring.com performance score

65

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

70/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

91/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.0 s

81/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value960 ms

29/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.014

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.9 s

34/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

com-port-monitoring.com

334 ms

www.com-port-monitoring.com

653 ms

cookie.png

169 ms

spm40.png

199 ms

spm-free.png

297 ms

Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Com-port-monitoring.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (913 ms) belongs to the original domain Com-port-monitoring.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 354.6 kB (54%)

Content Size

651.7 kB

After Optimization

297.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Com-port-monitoring.com main page is 651.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 402.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 342.1 kB

  • Original 402.4 kB
  • After minification 357.0 kB
  • After compression 60.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 45.4 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 342.1 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 12.5 kB

  • Original 249.3 kB
  • After minification 236.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Com Port Monitor Ing images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

25

After Optimization

25

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Com Port Monitor Ing. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

com-port-monitoring.com

com-port-monitoring.com

334 ms

www.com-port-monitoring.com

www.com-port-monitoring.com

653 ms

cookie.png

cookie.png

169 ms

spm40.png

spm40.png

199 ms

spm-free.png

spm-free.png

297 ms

ic-download.png

ic-download.png

298 ms

spm.png

spm.png

303 ms

AdvancedTerminal.png

AdvancedTerminal.png

304 ms

vspd_corporate.png

vspd_corporate.png

404 ms

no-repeat.png

no-repeat.png

406 ms

img-logging.png

img-logging.png

394 ms

img-virtual.png

img-virtual.png

396 ms

img-realtime.png

img-realtime.png

404 ms

product.png

product.png

504 ms

screen-spm.jpg

screen-spm.jpg

591 ms

RedHeart.svg

RedHeart.svg

496 ms

sourceForgeBig.png

sourceForgeBig.png

506 ms

sourceForgeBigXs.png

sourceForgeBigXs.png

505 ms

sourceForge.png

sourceForge.png

506 ms

capterra.png

capterra.png

595 ms

trustRadius.png

trustRadius.png

604 ms

winLargeSpmIcon.png

winLargeSpmIcon.png

607 ms

winMobSpmIcon.png

winMobSpmIcon.png

607 ms

dealsIcon.png

dealsIcon.png

609 ms

product-info_sprite.png

product-info_sprite.png

688 ms

897 ms

SourceSans3VF-Roman.ttf.woff

SourceSans3VF-Roman.ttf.woff

840 ms

ElmeticaNew.ttf

ElmeticaNew.ttf

541 ms

Montserrat-Medium.ttf

Montserrat-Medium.ttf

785 ms

Montserrat-variations.ttf

Montserrat-variations.ttf

913 ms

Montserrat-Bold.ttf

Montserrat-Bold.ttf

723 ms

Montserrat-Black.ttf

Montserrat-Black.ttf

850 ms

cover.jpg

cover.jpg

129 ms

Accessibility Review

com-port-monitoring.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

com-port-monitoring.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

com-port-monitoring.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a valid hreflang

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Com-port-monitoring.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Com-port-monitoring.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

com-port-monitoring.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Com Port Monitor Ing. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: