3.1 sec in total
231 ms
2.5 sec
366 ms
Visit comexit.net now to see the best up-to-date COMEX It content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about comexit.net
Highly experienced IT staff that have a single goal in mind….. to provide our customers with genuine value for money and unrivalled quality
Visit comexit.netWe analyzed Comexit.net page load time and found that the first response time was 231 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
comexit.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
54/100
10%
Value2.9 s
79/100
25%
Value4.2 s
77/100
10%
Value250 ms
84/100
30%
Value0.19
65/100
15%
Value7.8 s
44/100
10%
231 ms
982 ms
19 ms
32 ms
285 ms
Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (21 requests) were addressed to the original Comexit.net, 19% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (982 ms) belongs to the original domain Comexit.net.
Page size can be reduced by 14.1 kB (3%)
461.9 kB
447.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Comexit.net main page is 461.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 422.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 14.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.1 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. COMEX It images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 50 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (37%)
19
12
The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of COMEX It. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
comexit.net
231 ms
www.comexit.net
982 ms
bootstrap.css
19 ms
site-support.css
32 ms
all.min.css
285 ms
css2
49 ms
site-style.css
44 ms
js
77 ms
site-support.js
49 ms
site-scripts.js
46 ms
comex.svg
113 ms
banner_2.jpg
329 ms
banner_1.jpg
348 ms
banner_3.jpg
428 ms
banner_4.jpg
334 ms
home_tele.jpg
263 ms
home_it.jpg
114 ms
home_radio.jpg
120 ms
home_tech.jpg
144 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM70w9.woff
102 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC70w9.woff
115 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu170w9.woff
127 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Ew9.woff
128 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Ew9.woff
128 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Ew9.woff
129 ms
analytics.js
10 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
347 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
669 ms
fa-light-300.woff
731 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
652 ms
collect
37 ms
comexit.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
comexit.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
comexit.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Comexit.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Comexit.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
comexit.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of COMEX It. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: