Tools & Wizards About Us
compara.ro screenshot

Report Summary

  • 55

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 38% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

compara.ro

Cumpara inteligent! Compara orice, oricand, oriunde!

Page Load Speed

4.6 sec in total

First Response

948 ms

Resources Loaded

3.4 sec

Page Rendered

251 ms

compara.ro screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Compara content for Romania. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about compara.ro

Compara preturile la produse din cele mai bune magazine online. Oferte , reduceri si comparatii la produse laptopuri , telefoane, calculatoare, camere foto

Visit compara.ro

Key Findings

We analyzed Compara.ro page load time and found that the first response time was 948 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

compara.ro performance score

55

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

46/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.2 s

5/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.3 s

58/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value340 ms

74/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.004

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.3 s

61/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.compara.ro

948 ms

basic.css

250 ms

style.css

355 ms

main.js

591 ms

js

78 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Compara.ro, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (948 ms) belongs to the original domain Compara.ro.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 211.6 kB (28%)

Content Size

755.2 kB

After Optimization

543.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Compara.ro main page is 755.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 527.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 84.6 kB

  • Original 100.3 kB
  • After minification 94.2 kB
  • After compression 15.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 84.6 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 125.1 kB

  • Original 527.7 kB
  • After minification 402.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Compara needs image optimization as it can save up to 125.1 kB or 24% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 944 B

  • Original 92.4 kB
  • After minification 92.3 kB
  • After compression 91.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 912 B

  • Original 34.9 kB
  • After minification 34.9 kB
  • After compression 34.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Compara.ro has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (35%)

Requests Now

48

After Optimization

31

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Compara. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.compara.ro

www.compara.ro

948 ms

basic.css

basic.css

250 ms

style.css

style.css

355 ms

main.js

main.js

591 ms

js

js

78 ms

brand.js.php

brand.js.php

281 ms

show-ad.js.php

show-ad.js.php

312 ms

show-ad.js.php

show-ad.js.php

388 ms

kCommons.js.php

kCommons.js.php

410 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

67 ms

banner-1.jpg

banner-1.jpg

239 ms

banner-2.jpg

banner-2.jpg

355 ms

banner-3.jpg

banner-3.jpg

358 ms

banner-4.jpg

banner-4.jpg

369 ms

logo.png

logo.png

365 ms

loading3.gif

loading3.gif

135 ms

logo-sm.png

logo-sm.png

358 ms

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

455 ms

collect

collect

27 ms

spacer.gif

spacer.gif

366 ms

thumbnail.php

thumbnail.php

395 ms

thumbnail.php

thumbnail.php

442 ms

dd_arrow.gif

dd_arrow.gif

377 ms

thumbnail.php

thumbnail.php

469 ms

thumbnail.php

thumbnail.php

515 ms

banner_default_m1.gif

banner_default_m1.gif

490 ms

mesh.png

mesh.png

504 ms

jquery.unveil.js

jquery.unveil.js

505 ms

idangerous.swiper-2.4.min.js

idangerous.swiper-2.4.min.js

543 ms

brand_panel.php

brand_panel.php

597 ms

collect

collect

30 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

77 ms

9.gif

9.gif

457 ms

mop-vileda-spray-max-3741568-200x200.jpg

mop-vileda-spray-max-3741568-200x200.jpg

166 ms

media-player-amazon-fire-tv-stick-3rd-gen-2021-control-vocal-alexa-negru-4159170-200x200.jpg

media-player-amazon-fire-tv-stick-3rd-gen-2021-control-vocal-alexa-negru-4159170-200x200.jpg

261 ms

televizor-led-nei-32ne4900-80-cm-smart-hd-clasa-f-3657423-200x200.jpg

televizor-led-nei-32ne4900-80-cm-smart-hd-clasa-f-3657423-200x200.jpg

196 ms

thumb-1009-140-100.jpg

thumb-1009-140-100.jpg

305 ms

thumb-1014-140-100.jpg

thumb-1014-140-100.jpg

401 ms

thumb-1054-140-100.jpg

thumb-1054-140-100.jpg

375 ms

thumb-1178-140-100.jpg

thumb-1178-140-100.jpg

435 ms

thumb-1188-140-100.jpg

thumb-1188-140-100.jpg

464 ms

thumb-1341-140-100.jpg

thumb-1341-140-100.jpg

490 ms

thumb-1373-140-100.jpg

thumb-1373-140-100.jpg

517 ms

thumb-2277-140-100.jpg

thumb-2277-140-100.jpg

545 ms

thumb-4737-140-100.jpg

thumb-4737-140-100.jpg

568 ms

no-image.gif

no-image.gif

413 ms

no-image.gif

no-image.gif

378 ms

no-image.gif

no-image.gif

365 ms

no-image.gif

no-image.gif

358 ms

no-image.gif

no-image.gif

327 ms

Accessibility Review

compara.ro accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

compara.ro best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

compara.ro SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RO

  • Language Claimed

    RO

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Compara.ro can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Romanian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Compara.ro main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

compara.ro

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Compara. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: