2.2 sec in total
147 ms
1.8 sec
270 ms
Click here to check amazing Compare Bear content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about compare-bear.com
Compare-Bear.com is your #1 resource for tips & tricks and product reviews for tools. We analyze complicated welding tools, rugged machine tools or simple hand tools and create detailed in-depth compa...
Visit compare-bear.comWe analyzed Compare-bear.com page load time and found that the first response time was 147 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
compare-bear.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.3 s
3/100
10%
Value14.2 s
0/100
25%
Value9.3 s
13/100
10%
Value1,530 ms
13/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value14.9 s
8/100
10%
147 ms
364 ms
140 ms
275 ms
208 ms
Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Compare-bear.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (720 ms) belongs to the original domain Compare-bear.com.
Page size can be reduced by 177.1 kB (18%)
1.0 MB
833.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Compare-bear.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 382.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 89.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 89.0 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Compare Bear images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 24.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 51.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Compare-bear.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 51.4 kB or 24% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (67%)
51
17
The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Compare Bear. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
compare-bear.com
147 ms
compare-bear.com
364 ms
cv.css
140 ms
style.min.css
275 ms
style.css
208 ms
style.css
479 ms
css
40 ms
tablepress-combined.min.css
208 ms
js_composer.min.css
421 ms
eggrehub.css
218 ms
style.css
280 ms
responsive.css
279 ms
css.css
290 ms
font-awesome.min.css
410 ms
front.css
345 ms
jquery.min.js
502 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
363 ms
core.min.js
415 ms
front.js
445 ms
price_alert.js
516 ms
front.min.js
556 ms
adsbygoogle.js
66 ms
cv.js
515 ms
inview.js
516 ms
pgwmodal.js
548 ms
unveil.js
550 ms
cuttabs.js
551 ms
hoverintent.js
616 ms
niceselect.js
665 ms
countdown.js
665 ms
custom.js
720 ms
comment-reply.min.js
666 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
667 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
693 ms
gtm.js
135 ms
compare-bear-logo.png
166 ms
esab-rebel-285ic-e1522401198966.jpg
241 ms
leather-welding-gloves.jpg
459 ms
lincoln-electric-weld-pak-125-hd-k2513.jpg
241 ms
noimage_336_220.png
219 ms
blank.gif
240 ms
noimage_70_70.png
241 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
453 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
544 ms
fa-light-300.woff
638 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfABc9.ttf
125 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu5mxP.ttf
178 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
418 ms
zrt_lookup.html
144 ms
show_ads_impl.js
162 ms
analytics.js
100 ms
welder-1vtxz6esgh0yei9dqcte39ozwayotbg3z9c3nw0l57t0.jpg
154 ms
hobart-handler-190-1vtxyx1yyg25blzmzblsry7zq3w4yd8mtv100974jtfo.jpg
311 ms
construction-welder-with-helmet-1vtxzt1f31pgea75zpxh6ii2taugu8zt080dzmp9pxek.jpg
310 ms
welder-1vtxz6esaimh845daitcihjnbswo29zayw0budk5kovo.jpg
310 ms
hobart-handler-190-1vtxyx1yshno57vmjhlr762n5lu47brtthp86qqp07os.jpg
319 ms
collect
28 ms
ads
341 ms
js
48 ms
compare-bear.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
compare-bear.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
compare-bear.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Compare-bear.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Compare-bear.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
compare-bear.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Compare Bear. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: