4.7 sec in total
1.1 sec
3.1 sec
537 ms
Visit compare-network-monitoring-tools.com now to see the best up-to-date Compare Network Monitoring Tools content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about compare-network-monitoring-tools.com
The article will talk a lot about what a managed VPS server is, the benefit of using the managed VPS for your website hosting, and the comparison between the dedicated server with the cloud server and...
Visit compare-network-monitoring-tools.comWe analyzed Compare-network-monitoring-tools.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
compare-network-monitoring-tools.com performance score
1096 ms
660 ms
920 ms
105 ms
614 ms
Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Compare-network-monitoring-tools.com, 89% (32 requests) were made to Hiboox.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Hiboox.com.
Page size can be reduced by 73.8 kB (20%)
377.2 kB
303.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Compare-network-monitoring-tools.com main page is 377.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 287.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 70.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 70.5 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Compare Network Monitoring Tools images are well optimized though.
Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (10%)
30
27
The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Compare Network Monitoring Tools. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
compare-network-monitoring-tools.com
1096 ms
660 ms
3043f5f809a684a5066f052e322098e7.css
920 ms
logoHiBoox.gif
105 ms
website-660x330.jpg
614 ms
dedicated-server-750x500.jpg
800 ms
How-to-Choose-a-Dedicated-Server-750x499.jpg
907 ms
software-2-1-750x500.jpg
815 ms
software-2-750x501.jpg
1009 ms
software-1-750x501.jpg
1282 ms
css
28 ms
frontend.min.js
1326 ms
tie-scripts.js
863 ms
ilightbox.packed.js
1006 ms
lazyload.min.js
1007 ms
suz001-150x150.jpg
1328 ms
insta-like-310x165.jpg
1006 ms
young-job-seekers-310x165.jpg
1007 ms
Social-Media-Report-310x165.jpg
1008 ms
insta-like-110x75.jpg
1010 ms
Top-pediatric-residency-programs-110x75.jpg
1063 ms
Moving-1-110x75.jpg
1041 ms
young-job-seekers-110x75.jpg
1063 ms
Social-Media-Report-110x75.jpg
1103 ms
Saratoga-110x75.png
1099 ms
Software-Consultancy-110x75.jpg
1098 ms
Vip-transport-110x75.jpg
1141 ms
Digital-marketing-110x75.jpg
1154 ms
Luxury-Yacht-110x75.jpg
1145 ms
body-bg41.png
242 ms
home.png
243 ms
stripe.png
258 ms
SlGVmQWMvZQIdix7AFxXkHNSaA.ttf
22 ms
SlGWmQWMvZQIdix7AFxXmMh3eDs1Yg.ttf
33 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
253 ms
BebasNeue-webfont.woff
231 ms
compare-network-monitoring-tools.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Compare-network-monitoring-tools.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Compare-network-monitoring-tools.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
compare-network-monitoring-tools.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Compare Network Monitoring Tools. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: