Tools & Wizards About Us
compare-trials.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 75

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    83% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

compare-trials.org

Tracking switched outcomes in clinical trials - Tracking switched outcomes in clinical trials

Page Load Speed

632 ms in total

First Response

28 ms

Resources Loaded

480 ms

Page Rendered

124 ms

compare-trials.org screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Compare Trials content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about compare-trials.org

Outcome switching in clinical trials is a serious problem. Between October 2015 and January 2016, the COMPare team systematically checked every trial published in the top five medical journals, to see...

Visit compare-trials.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Compare-trials.org page load time and found that the first response time was 28 ms and then it took 604 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

compare-trials.org performance score

75

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

48/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

59/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.1 s

93/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value130 ms

96/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.154

74/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.1 s

63/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

compare-trials.org

28 ms

www.compare-trials.org

97 ms

style.css

47 ms

wpsm-style.css

78 ms

easy-twitter-feed-widget.css

69 ms

Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Compare-trials.org, 5% (2 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (157 ms) belongs to the original domain Compare-trials.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 30.2 kB (21%)

Content Size

141.6 kB

After Optimization

111.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Compare-trials.org main page is 141.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 63.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 16.0 kB

  • Original 20.5 kB
  • After minification 19.1 kB
  • After compression 4.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.0 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 13.1 kB

  • Original 63.9 kB
  • After minification 50.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Compare Trials needs image optimization as it can save up to 13.1 kB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 57.2 kB
  • After minification 57.2 kB
  • After compression 56.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (63%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

12

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Compare Trials. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

compare-trials.org

compare-trials.org

28 ms

www.compare-trials.org

www.compare-trials.org

97 ms

style.css

style.css

47 ms

wpsm-style.css

wpsm-style.css

78 ms

easy-twitter-feed-widget.css

easy-twitter-feed-widget.css

69 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

72 ms

css2

css2

43 ms

index.css

index.css

81 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

44 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

93 ms

svg-inline-min.js

svg-inline-min.js

97 ms

responsive-menu.js

responsive-menu.js

115 ms

st_insights.js

st_insights.js

26 ms

plausible.compat.js

plausible.compat.js

127 ms

datatables.min.js

datatables.min.js

55 ms

tabletop.js

tabletop.js

126 ms

countUp.js

countUp.js

157 ms

all.js

all.js

140 ms

wpsm-script.js

wpsm-script.js

133 ms

widget-easy-twitter-feed-widget.js

widget-easy-twitter-feed-widget.js

135 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

149 ms

logo_white.svg

logo_white.svg

67 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

91 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

91 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

63 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

92 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

91 ms

oxford_logo.png

oxford_logo.png

119 ms

nuffield_logo.png

nuffield_logo.png

115 ms

cebm_logo.png

cebm_logo.png

110 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

16 ms

1EgNcKJ_p4v7P0JNq5GSElKGvDX88z8QZN52n8C-yQAc

1EgNcKJ_p4v7P0JNq5GSElKGvDX88z8QZN52n8C-yQAc

67 ms

widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html

widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html

28 ms

1EgNcKJ_p4v7P0JNq5GSElKGvDX88z8QZN52n8C-yQAc.js

1EgNcKJ_p4v7P0JNq5GSElKGvDX88z8QZN52n8C-yQAc.js

61 ms

Qw3GZR9MED_6PSuS_50nEaVrfzgEXH0.ttf

Qw3GZR9MED_6PSuS_50nEaVrfzgEXH0.ttf

15 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Ew-.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Ew-.ttf

21 ms

1EgNcKJ_p4v7P0JNq5GSElKGvDX88z8QZN52n8C-yQAc-od6

1EgNcKJ_p4v7P0JNq5GSElKGvDX88z8QZN52n8C-yQAc-od6

16 ms

1EgNcKJ_p4v7P0JNq5GSElKGvDX88z8QZN52n8C-yQAc-od6.js

1EgNcKJ_p4v7P0JNq5GSElKGvDX88z8QZN52n8C-yQAc-od6.js

36 ms

Accessibility Review

compare-trials.org accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

compare-trials.org best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

compare-trials.org SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Compare-trials.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Compare-trials.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

compare-trials.org

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Compare Trials. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: