Tools & Wizards About Us
compare-trials.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 65

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    79% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 77% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

compare-trials.org

Tracking switched outcomes in clinical trials - Tracking switched outcomes in clinical trials

Page Load Speed

2.3 sec in total

First Response

234 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

310 ms

compare-trials.org screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Compare Trials content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about compare-trials.org

Outcome switching in clinical trials is a serious problem. Between October 2015 and January 2016, the COMPare team systematically checked every trial published in the top five medical journals, to see...

Visit compare-trials.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Compare-trials.org page load time and found that the first response time was 234 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

compare-trials.org performance score

65

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

33/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

40/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.5 s

87/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value280 ms

81/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.099

90/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.2 s

50/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.compare-trials.org

234 ms

style.css

232 ms

wpsm-style.css

324 ms

easy-twitter-feed-widget.css

243 ms

dashicons.min.css

234 ms

Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Compare-trials.org, 6% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (841 ms) relates to the external source Cdn.datatables.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 30.5 kB (27%)

Content Size

112.1 kB

After Optimization

81.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Compare-trials.org main page is 112.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 63.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 16.2 kB

  • Original 20.7 kB
  • After minification 19.3 kB
  • After compression 4.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.2 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 13.1 kB

  • Original 63.9 kB
  • After minification 50.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Compare Trials needs image optimization as it can save up to 13.1 kB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 1.2 kB

  • Original 27.5 kB
  • After minification 27.5 kB
  • After compression 26.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (58%)

Requests Now

31

After Optimization

13

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Compare Trials. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.compare-trials.org

www.compare-trials.org

234 ms

style.css

style.css

232 ms

wpsm-style.css

wpsm-style.css

324 ms

easy-twitter-feed-widget.css

easy-twitter-feed-widget.css

243 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

234 ms

css2

css2

185 ms

index.css

index.css

240 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

393 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

489 ms

svg-inline-min.js

svg-inline-min.js

609 ms

responsive-menu.js

responsive-menu.js

623 ms

st_insights.js

st_insights.js

288 ms

plausible.compat.js

plausible.compat.js

284 ms

datatables.min.js

datatables.min.js

841 ms

tabletop.js

tabletop.js

466 ms

countUp.js

countUp.js

508 ms

all.js

all.js

587 ms

wpsm-script.js

wpsm-script.js

769 ms

widget-easy-twitter-feed-widget.js

widget-easy-twitter-feed-widget.js

768 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

769 ms

logo_white.svg

logo_white.svg

228 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

236 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

175 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

381 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

275 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

251 ms

oxford_logo.png

oxford_logo.png

504 ms

nuffield_logo.png

nuffield_logo.png

416 ms

cebm_logo.png

cebm_logo.png

472 ms

Qw3GZR9MED_6PSuS_50nEaVrfzgEXH4.woff

Qw3GZR9MED_6PSuS_50nEaVrfzgEXH4.woff

106 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Ew9.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Ew9.woff

107 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

109 ms

1EgNcKJ_p4v7P0JNq5GSElKGvDX88z8QZN52n8C-yQAc

1EgNcKJ_p4v7P0JNq5GSElKGvDX88z8QZN52n8C-yQAc

174 ms

widget_iframe.7dae38096d06923d683a2a807172322a.html

widget_iframe.7dae38096d06923d683a2a807172322a.html

92 ms

1EgNcKJ_p4v7P0JNq5GSElKGvDX88z8QZN52n8C-yQAc.js

1EgNcKJ_p4v7P0JNq5GSElKGvDX88z8QZN52n8C-yQAc.js

232 ms

settings

settings

90 ms

Accessibility Review

compare-trials.org accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

compare-trials.org best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

compare-trials.org SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Compare-trials.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Compare-trials.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

compare-trials.org

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Compare Trials. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: