Tools & Wizards About Us
compareairconditioning.com.au screenshot

Report Summary

  • 18

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    34% of other websites

  • 70

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 35% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 73

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    31% of websites

compareairconditioning.com.au

Compare Air Conditioning | Where Aussies Go For AC Installation Advice

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

186 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

290 ms

compareairconditioning.com.au screenshot

About Website

Welcome to compareairconditioning.com.au homepage info - get ready to check Compare Air Conditioning best content for Australia right away, or after learning these important things about compareairconditioning.com.au

Compare Air Conditioning is Australia's only Air Con comparison website. We're dedicated to assisting you choose the right AC installation company by comparing all the leading operators so you...

Visit compareairconditioning.com.au

Key Findings

We analyzed Compareairconditioning.com.au page load time and found that the first response time was 186 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

compareairconditioning.com.au performance score

18

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value25.4 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value27.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value53.4 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,410 ms

15/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.103

89/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value36.9 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.compareairconditioning.com.au

186 ms

gppstub.js

89 ms

style.min.css

25 ms

classic-themes.min.css

41 ms

styles.css

40 ms

Our browser made a total of 93 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (73 requests) were addressed to the original Compareairconditioning.com.au, 5% (5 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (813 ms) belongs to the original domain Compareairconditioning.com.au.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 157.0 kB (35%)

Content Size

449.5 kB

After Optimization

292.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Compareairconditioning.com.au main page is 449.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 149.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 117.3 kB

  • Original 140.6 kB
  • After minification 130.8 kB
  • After compression 23.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 117.3 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-39%

Potential reduce by 28.7 kB

  • Original 74.4 kB
  • After minification 45.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Compare Air Conditioning needs image optimization as it can save up to 28.7 kB or 39% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 3.4 kB

  • Original 149.5 kB
  • After minification 149.5 kB
  • After compression 146.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 7.6 kB

  • Original 85.0 kB
  • After minification 83.0 kB
  • After compression 77.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Compareairconditioning.com.au has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 52 (58%)

Requests Now

90

After Optimization

38

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 90 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Compare Air Conditioning. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 39 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.compareairconditioning.com.au

www.compareairconditioning.com.au

186 ms

gppstub.js

gppstub.js

89 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

25 ms

classic-themes.min.css

classic-themes.min.css

41 ms

styles.css

styles.css

40 ms

style.css

style.css

45 ms

css

css

62 ms

style.css

style.css

62 ms

css

css

75 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

44 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

61 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

60 ms

owl.theme.default.min.css

owl.theme.default.min.css

61 ms

style.css

style.css

223 ms

custom.css

custom.css

66 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

74 ms

tablepress-combined.min.css

tablepress-combined.min.css

75 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

76 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

71 ms

price_alert.js

price_alert.js

77 ms

js

js

131 ms

chat.js

chat.js

59 ms

ccpaplus.js

ccpaplus.js

126 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

71 ms

index.js

index.js

116 ms

index.js

index.js

117 ms

infusion.js

infusion.js

118 ms

jquery.uniform.min.js

jquery.uniform.min.js

119 ms

custom.js

custom.js

119 ms

idle-timer.min.js

idle-timer.min.js

120 ms

gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js

gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js

120 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

121 ms

jquery.touchSwipe.min.js

jquery.touchSwipe.min.js

123 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

123 ms

Chart.bundle.min.js

Chart.bundle.min.js

71 ms

jquery.balloon.min.js

jquery.balloon.min.js

127 ms

general.js

general.js

124 ms

v.js

v.js

177 ms

boise.js

boise.js

46 ms

abilene.js

abilene.js

50 ms

et.js

et.js

47 ms

mulvane.js

mulvane.js

25 ms

wichita.js

wichita.js

9 ms

raleigh.js

raleigh.js

13 ms

vista.js

vista.js

25 ms

olathe.js

olathe.js

14 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

124 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

124 ms

ezoic.png

ezoic.png

329 ms

logo-new.png

logo-new.png

114 ms

logo.png

logo.png

115 ms

heroimg.png

heroimg.png

115 ms

ico_02.png

ico_02.png

207 ms

ico_03.png

ico_03.png

253 ms

ico_01.png

ico_01.png

292 ms

understanding-needs.svg

understanding-needs.svg

253 ms

findyourinstaller.svg

findyourinstaller.svg

246 ms

saving-money.svg

saving-money.svg

249 ms

saving-time.svg

saving-time.svg

317 ms

acguy.png

acguy.png

364 ms

advancedair.png

advancedair.png

362 ms

aussieairconditioning.png

aussieairconditioning.png

347 ms

btairconditioning.png

btairconditioning.png

399 ms

camrayair.png

camrayair.png

398 ms

dcdegree.png

dcdegree.png

492 ms

deepblue.png

deepblue.png

449 ms

electricallaser.png

electricallaser.png

450 ms

fordanddoonan.png

fordanddoonan.png

504 ms

lakesideair.png

lakesideair.png

504 ms

mueller.png

mueller.png

530 ms

nqcooling.png

nqcooling.png

685 ms

optima.png

optima.png

559 ms

theheatshop.png

theheatshop.png

634 ms

voltair.png

voltair.png

640 ms

our-methodology.jpg

our-methodology.jpg

734 ms

handicon.png

handicon.png

813 ms

arrowsign.png

arrowsign.png

683 ms

cs_img.png

cs_img.png

801 ms

up-arrow.png

up-arrow.png

744 ms

js

js

103 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

181 ms

js

js

146 ms

font

font

145 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

790 ms

collect

collect

20 ms

collect

collect

35 ms

collect

collect

84 ms

js

js

53 ms

vitals.js

vitals.js

343 ms

drake.js

drake.js

368 ms

chanute.js

chanute.js

379 ms

jellyfish.js

jellyfish.js

393 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

39 ms

Accessibility Review

compareairconditioning.com.au accessibility score

70

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

compareairconditioning.com.au best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

compareairconditioning.com.au SEO score

73

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Compareairconditioning.com.au can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Compareairconditioning.com.au main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

compareairconditioning.com.au

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Compare Air Conditioning. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: