Tools & Wizards About Us
compareandrecycle.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 51

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 72% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 95

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

compareandrecycle.co.uk

Compare and Recycle™ - Mobile Phone Recycling Comparison

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

321 ms

Resources Loaded

2.7 sec

Page Rendered

228 ms

compareandrecycle.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Compare And Recycle content for United Kingdom. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about compareandrecycle.co.uk

Compare and recycle with over 30 mobile phone recycling companies and sell your old phone at the UK's number 1 mobile phone recycling comparison site.

Visit compareandrecycle.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Compareandrecycle.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 321 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

compareandrecycle.co.uk performance score

51

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

92/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

35/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.6 s

97/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,240 ms

19/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.4 s

24/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

compareandrecycle.co.uk

321 ms

www.compareandrecycle.co.uk

703 ms

prum.min.js

82 ms

css

113 ms

1456398091.css

86 ms

Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Compareandrecycle.co.uk, 32% (20 requests) were made to Cruk-atomjuice.netdna-ssl.com and 11% (7 requests) were made to D.adroll.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (703 ms) belongs to the original domain Compareandrecycle.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 258.2 kB (46%)

Content Size

556.1 kB

After Optimization

298.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Compareandrecycle.co.uk main page is 556.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 422.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 19.6 kB

  • Original 27.4 kB
  • After minification 27.4 kB
  • After compression 7.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.6 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 91 B

  • Original 106.0 kB
  • After minification 105.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Compare And Recycle images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-56%

Potential reduce by 238.3 kB

  • Original 422.2 kB
  • After minification 421.3 kB
  • After compression 183.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 238.3 kB or 56% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-51%

Potential reduce by 255 B

  • Original 500 B
  • After minification 456 B
  • After compression 245 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Compareandrecycle.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 255 B or 51% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (56%)

Requests Now

48

After Optimization

21

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Compare And Recycle. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

compareandrecycle.co.uk

compareandrecycle.co.uk

321 ms

www.compareandrecycle.co.uk

www.compareandrecycle.co.uk

703 ms

prum.min.js

prum.min.js

82 ms

css

css

113 ms

1456398091.css

1456398091.css

86 ms

219832018.js

219832018.js

542 ms

1355933783.js

1355933783.js

80 ms

getseal

getseal

130 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

115 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

138 ms

1456404641.js

1456404641.js

91 ms

conversion.js

conversion.js

95 ms

event

event

131 ms

logo.png

logo.png

12 ms

webuser-gold-award.png

webuser-gold-award.png

12 ms

trust-seal.png

trust-seal.png

12 ms

gadget_show_logo.png

gadget_show_logo.png

13 ms

right-arrow.png

right-arrow.png

85 ms

iphone-5s-16gb.png

iphone-5s-16gb.png

84 ms

iphone-5-16gb.png

iphone-5-16gb.png

85 ms

galaxy-s5.png

galaxy-s5.png

85 ms

iphone-5c-16gb.png

iphone-5c-16gb.png

88 ms

galaxy-s4.png

galaxy-s4.png

87 ms

iphone-4s-16gb.png

iphone-4s-16gb.png

87 ms

fb.png

fb.png

86 ms

tw.png

tw.png

88 ms

gp.png

gp.png

87 ms

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

152 ms

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

174 ms

country-bg_ts1456140624.png

country-bg_ts1456140624.png

80 ms

home_light.svg

home_light.svg

113 ms

merchant-sprite_ts1456239463.png

merchant-sprite_ts1456239463.png

115 ms

getseal

getseal

78 ms

px.gif

px.gif

327 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

90 ms

68 ms

56 ms

collect

collect

14 ms

collect

collect

60 ms

collect

collect

34 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

18 ms

3147_BBD1855A_C702_4024_A8B3_10922083BDA2.js

3147_BBD1855A_C702_4024_A8B3_10922083BDA2.js

329 ms

beacon.gif

beacon.gif

95 ms

roundtrip.js

roundtrip.js

19 ms

FIZTYWOEAJD23JNWBMEMQP.js

FIZTYWOEAJD23JNWBMEMQP.js

110 ms

out

out

10 ms

tr

tr

133 ms

33 ms

out

out

8 ms

out

out

37 ms

out

out

37 ms

out

out

37 ms

out

out

36 ms

u.php

u.php

184 ms

sync

sync

106 ms

65 ms

adsct

adsct

144 ms

pixel

pixel

100 ms

logpv.aspx

logpv.aspx

341 ms

377928.gif

377928.gif

14 ms

sd

sd

5 ms

in

in

10 ms

Accessibility Review

compareandrecycle.co.uk accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

compareandrecycle.co.uk best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

compareandrecycle.co.uk SEO score

95

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Compareandrecycle.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Compareandrecycle.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

compareandrecycle.co.uk

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Compare And Recycle. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: