Tools & Wizards About Us
comparedabord.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 34

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    54% of other websites

  • 59

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 26% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

comparedabord.com

【体育赛事下注平台】中国有限公司

Page Load Speed

28.7 sec in total

First Response

983 ms

Resources Loaded

26.8 sec

Page Rendered

969 ms

comparedabord.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to comparedabord.com homepage info - get ready to check Comparedabord best content for France right away, or after learning these important things about comparedabord.com

【体育赛事下注平台】中国有限公司成立于1988年03注册资30（mm推荐发财）系宁波市鄞州区先进装备制造企业，下属有宏大电梯、欣达电梯配件、欣达印刷机器、欣达螺杆压缩机、乐邦电气、欣达重工等六家控股子公司。是上海建工集团股份有限公司旗下的具有机电安装工程施工总承包能力的大型安装企业。前身为成都市煤气总公司，是国内大中城市中最早经营城市天然气的专业公司之一。【体育赛事下注平台】中国有限公司公司长期致...

Visit comparedabord.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Comparedabord.com page load time and found that the first response time was 983 ms and then it took 27.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

comparedabord.com performance score

34

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.2 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.1 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.0 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value490 ms

58/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.013

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.7 s

13/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

comparedabord.com

983 ms

comparedabord.com

803 ms

www.comparedabord.com

394 ms

www.comparedabord.com

898 ms

hth.js

1655 ms

Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Comparedabord.com, 32% (12 requests) were made to Jifa001.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Da0006.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.1 sec) relates to the external source Jifa001.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 622.7 kB (10%)

Content Size

6.3 MB

After Optimization

5.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Comparedabord.com main page is 6.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 12.8 kB

  • Original 16.7 kB
  • After minification 14.9 kB
  • After compression 3.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.8 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.8 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 274.5 kB

  • Original 5.9 MB
  • After minification 5.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Comparedabord images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 333.1 kB

  • Original 420.2 kB
  • After minification 278.5 kB
  • After compression 87.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 333.1 kB or 79% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 2.3 kB

  • Original 10.4 kB
  • After minification 10.4 kB
  • After compression 8.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Comparedabord.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.3 kB or 22% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (24%)

Requests Now

33

After Optimization

25

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Comparedabord. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

comparedabord.com

comparedabord.com

983 ms

comparedabord.com

comparedabord.com

803 ms

www.comparedabord.com

www.comparedabord.com

394 ms

www.comparedabord.com

www.comparedabord.com

898 ms

hth.js

hth.js

1655 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

1604 ms

base.css

base.css

606 ms

swiper.css

swiper.css

610 ms

style.css

style.css

612 ms

swiper.js

swiper.js

1301 ms

hth.js

hth.js

1702 ms

hth.html

hth.html

253 ms

logo.png

logo.png

829 ms

202210180933495120.jpg

202210180933495120.jpg

1437 ms

202210180933392310.jpg

202210180933392310.jpg

1632 ms

202210181150324580.jpg

202210181150324580.jpg

1419 ms

202210181150222840.jpg

202210181150222840.jpg

1446 ms

202210181151574100.jpg

202210181151574100.jpg

4659 ms

202210181150464540.jpg

202210181150464540.jpg

1449 ms

202210181154331960.jpg

202210181154331960.jpg

4067 ms

202210181155345910.jpg

202210181155345910.jpg

3920 ms

202210181157127850.jpg

202210181157127850.jpg

3303 ms

202210191527349300.png

202210191527349300.png

9443 ms

qrcode.jpg

qrcode.jpg

3905 ms

gaba.png

gaba.png

3512 ms

js-sdk-pro.min.js

js-sdk-pro.min.js

526 ms

index-about.jpg

index-about.jpg

6139 ms

icon-phone.png

icon-phone.png

4055 ms

style.css

style.css

238 ms

link.js

link.js

459 ms

hth-section.png

hth-section.png

1765 ms

ld-section.png

ld-section.png

1455 ms

ky-section.png

ky-section.png

1730 ms

jn-section.png

jn-section.png

1356 ms

jiuyou-section.png

jiuyou-section.png

1307 ms

ml-section.png

ml-section.png

1741 ms

activity.png

activity.png

20075 ms

bg.jpg

bg.jpg

2320 ms

Accessibility Review

comparedabord.com accessibility score

59

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

comparedabord.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

comparedabord.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ZH

  • Language Claimed

    ZH

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Comparedabord.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Comparedabord.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

comparedabord.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Comparedabord. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: