Tools & Wizards About Us
comparedcare.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 54

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 89% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

comparedcare.com

Page Load Speed

2.2 sec in total

First Response

119 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

876 ms

comparedcare.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to comparedcare.com homepage info - get ready to check Comparedcare best content right away, or after learning these important things about comparedcare.com

Compared Care helps you price shop for healthcare procedures and services in your area. Easily compare the cost of care from all providers.

Visit comparedcare.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Comparedcare.com page load time and found that the first response time was 119 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

comparedcare.com performance score

54

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

70/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

79/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.3 s

91/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,140 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.0 s

26/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

comparedcare.com

119 ms

bootstrap.min.css

90 ms

select2.css

58 ms

style2.css

55 ms

jquery.bxslider.css

56 ms

Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 47% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Comparedcare.com, 9% (6 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to F.vimeocdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (635 ms) relates to the external source Cdn.mouseflow.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (41%)

Content Size

2.6 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Comparedcare.com main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 22.6 kB

  • Original 29.3 kB
  • After minification 22.5 kB
  • After compression 6.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.8 kB, which is 23% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.6 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 196.8 kB

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Comparedcare needs image optimization as it can save up to 196.8 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 609.4 kB

  • Original 958.8 kB
  • After minification 957.7 kB
  • After compression 349.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 609.4 kB or 64% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 245.9 kB

  • Original 289.6 kB
  • After minification 278.7 kB
  • After compression 43.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Comparedcare.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 245.9 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (58%)

Requests Now

59

After Optimization

25

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Comparedcare. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

comparedcare.com

comparedcare.com

119 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

90 ms

select2.css

select2.css

58 ms

style2.css

style2.css

55 ms

jquery.bxslider.css

jquery.bxslider.css

56 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

45 ms

css

css

53 ms

css

css

96 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

61 ms

angular.min.js

angular.min.js

72 ms

angular-animate.min.js

angular-animate.min.js

73 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

56 ms

select2.min.js

select2.min.js

59 ms

velocity.min.js

velocity.min.js

58 ms

unslider-min.js

unslider-min.js

52 ms

unslider.css

unslider.css

49 ms

unslider-dots.css

unslider-dots.css

51 ms

app.js

app.js

69 ms

slim-081711.css

slim-081711.css

61 ms

js

js

63 ms

gmaps.min.js

gmaps.min.js

54 ms

jquery.bxslider.min.js

jquery.bxslider.min.js

68 ms

logo.png

logo.png

207 ms

153566490

153566490

171 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

117 ms

hotjar-127065.js

hotjar-127065.js

240 ms

73677a3d-38bf-4b30-813e-af7be23c4b0e.js

73677a3d-38bf-4b30-813e-af7be23c4b0e.js

635 ms

survicate.js

survicate.js

490 ms

doctor-icon.png

doctor-icon.png

32 ms

cart.png

cart.png

34 ms

insurance.png

insurance.png

33 ms

piggy.png

piggy.png

31 ms

search5.png

search5.png

34 ms

ajax-loader.gif

ajax-loader.gif

53 ms

stomach.png

stomach.png

53 ms

chiro.png

chiro.png

54 ms

xray.png

xray.png

55 ms

mri.png

mri.png

57 ms

doctor.png

doctor.png

70 ms

bg3.jpg

bg3.jpg

167 ms

time.png

time.png

71 ms

betamore.png

betamore.png

71 ms

breakfast.png

breakfast.png

70 ms

huffington.png

huffington.png

71 ms

mhealth.png

mhealth.png

103 ms

technically.png

technically.png

131 ms

umbc.png

umbc.png

131 ms

select2.png

select2.png

132 ms

1EqTbJWOZQBfhZ0e3RL9uvesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf

1EqTbJWOZQBfhZ0e3RL9uvesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf

25 ms

0DeoTBMnW4sOpD0Zb8OQSALUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.ttf

0DeoTBMnW4sOpD0Zb8OQSALUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.ttf

26 ms

MZ1aViPqjfvZwVD_tzjjkwLUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.ttf

MZ1aViPqjfvZwVD_tzjjkwLUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.ttf

29 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

48 ms

collect

collect

30 ms

player.js

player.js

137 ms

player.css

player.css

109 ms

ga.js

ga.js

69 ms

vuid.min.js

vuid.min.js

129 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

37 ms

modules-79ac3e471402dedc7fa595a0b4974f10.js

modules-79ac3e471402dedc7fa595a0b4974f10.js

162 ms

proxy.html

proxy.html

78 ms

553885115.jpg

553885115.jpg

560 ms

default-green_60x60.png

default-green_60x60.png

29 ms

visit-data

visit-data

209 ms

a.gif

a.gif

102 ms

Accessibility Review

comparedcare.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

comparedcare.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

comparedcare.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Comparedcare.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Comparedcare.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

comparedcare.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Comparedcare. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: