Tools & Wizards About Us
comparelifeplans.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 50

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    68% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

comparelifeplans.com

Compare Life Insurance Today - comparelifeplans.com

Page Load Speed

2.3 sec in total

First Response

273 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

572 ms

comparelifeplans.com screenshot

About Website

Visit comparelifeplans.com now to see the best up-to-date Compare Life Plans content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about comparelifeplans.com

Over 500,000+ people have used our websites to save money and find the right Life Insurance. Compare Today!

Visit comparelifeplans.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Comparelifeplans.com page load time and found that the first response time was 273 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

comparelifeplans.com performance score

50

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

47/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

23/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.7 s

86/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value840 ms

35/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.021

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.5 s

59/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

comparelifeplans.com

273 ms

css2

32 ms

v0.js

91 ms

amp-form-0.1.js

83 ms

amp-analytics-0.1.js

76 ms

Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 26% of them (9 requests) were addressed to the original Comparelifeplans.com, 26% (9 requests) were made to Cdn.ampproject.org and 21% (7 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (708 ms) relates to the external source Static.hotjar.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 118.9 kB (49%)

Content Size

241.2 kB

After Optimization

122.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Comparelifeplans.com main page is 241.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 141.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 118.6 kB

  • Original 141.8 kB
  • After minification 119.7 kB
  • After compression 23.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 22.1 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 118.6 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 156 B
  • After minification 156 B

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Compare Life Plans images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 260 B

  • Original 99.2 kB
  • After minification 99.2 kB
  • After compression 99.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (61%)

Requests Now

33

After Optimization

13

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Compare Life Plans. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

comparelifeplans.com

comparelifeplans.com

273 ms

css2

css2

32 ms

v0.js

v0.js

91 ms

amp-form-0.1.js

amp-form-0.1.js

83 ms

amp-analytics-0.1.js

amp-analytics-0.1.js

76 ms

amp-mustache-0.2.js

amp-mustache-0.2.js

82 ms

amp-user-notification-0.1.js

amp-user-notification-0.1.js

88 ms

amp-iframe-0.1.js

amp-iframe-0.1.js

88 ms

amp-accordion-0.1.js

amp-accordion-0.1.js

113 ms

amp-lightbox-0.1.js

amp-lightbox-0.1.js

114 ms

amp-bind-0.1.js

amp-bind-0.1.js

115 ms

1c5360fcf5.js

1c5360fcf5.js

116 ms

js

js

117 ms

js

js

282 ms

js

js

585 ms

optimize.js

optimize.js

117 ms

js

js

436 ms

js

js

445 ms

js

js

452 ms

js

js

704 ms

hotjar-446818.js

hotjar-446818.js

708 ms

bg0.svg

bg0.svg

432 ms

tickgreen.svg

tickgreen.svg

648 ms

lig.svg

lig.svg

647 ms

cig.svg

cig.svg

388 ms

wolb.svg

wolb.svg

649 ms

smokeb.svg

smokeb.svg

390 ms

nosmokeb.svg

nosmokeb.svg

392 ms

select-arrow.png

select-arrow.png

644 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

589 ms

collect

collect

74 ms

collect

collect

86 ms

modules.cbd9768ba80ba0be5b17.js

modules.cbd9768ba80ba0be5b17.js

88 ms

box-69edcc3187336f9b0a3fbb4c73be9fe6.html

box-69edcc3187336f9b0a3fbb4c73be9fe6.html

130 ms

Accessibility Review

comparelifeplans.com accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

comparelifeplans.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

comparelifeplans.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Comparelifeplans.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Comparelifeplans.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

comparelifeplans.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Compare Life Plans. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: