Tools & Wizards About Us
comparesoft.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 81

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    86% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 91% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

comparesoft.com

UK's Best B2B Software Comparison Platform | Comparesoft

Page Load Speed

2.9 sec in total

First Response

168 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

1.5 sec

comparesoft.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to comparesoft.com homepage info - get ready to check Comparesoft best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about comparesoft.com

B2B software comparison platform designed to recommend the best products. Review UK based Software. Create your shortlist for free.

Visit comparesoft.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Comparesoft.com page load time and found that the first response time was 168 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

comparesoft.com performance score

81

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

84/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

58/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.0 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value220 ms

87/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.9 s

66/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

comparesoft.com

168 ms

comparesoft.com

458 ms

gtm.js

64 ms

auto.min.js

23 ms

page-home-www-306.js

138 ms

Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 18% of them (9 requests) were addressed to the original Comparesoft.com, 65% (33 requests) were made to Cdn.comparesoft.com and 12% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.comparesoft.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (600 ms) relates to the external source Cdn.comparesoft.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 364.3 kB (31%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

810.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Comparesoft.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 847.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 264.7 kB

  • Original 316.4 kB
  • After minification 316.4 kB
  • After compression 51.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 264.7 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 99.6 kB

  • Original 847.4 kB
  • After minification 747.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Comparesoft needs image optimization as it can save up to 99.6 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 10.6 kB
  • After minification 10.6 kB
  • After compression 10.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (7%)

Requests Now

43

After Optimization

40

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Comparesoft. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

comparesoft.com

comparesoft.com

168 ms

comparesoft.com

comparesoft.com

458 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

64 ms

auto.min.js

auto.min.js

23 ms

page-home-www-306.js

page-home-www-306.js

138 ms

logo.svg

logo.svg

23 ms

Bookmarks.svg

Bookmarks.svg

29 ms

ListMagnifyingGlass.svg

ListMagnifyingGlass.svg

26 ms

designhalo_Photo_of_two_people_45_years_old_in_good_mood_collab_2edee0d2-543a-4509-b9cc-c2d8ab8bded3-2-e1712564542211.webp

designhalo_Photo_of_two_people_45_years_old_in_good_mood_collab_2edee0d2-543a-4509-b9cc-c2d8ab8bded3-2-e1712564542211.webp

28 ms

image-2041.png

image-2041.png

42 ms

image-2026.png

image-2026.png

42 ms

1319578-e1712134373759.png

1319578-e1712134373759.png

43 ms

image-2042.png

image-2042.png

44 ms

image-2033.png

image-2033.png

43 ms

image-2032.png

image-2032.png

44 ms

Screenshot-2024-04-02-at-16.35.50-e1712141190344.webp

Screenshot-2024-04-02-at-16.35.50-e1712141190344.webp

45 ms

ArrowDown.svg

ArrowDown.svg

44 ms

Screenshot-2024-04-02-at-16.51.41-e1712141212579.webp

Screenshot-2024-04-02-at-16.51.41-e1712141212579.webp

46 ms

Screenshot-2024-04-02-at-16.54.27-e1712141222997.webp

Screenshot-2024-04-02-at-16.54.27-e1712141222997.webp

46 ms

img1.png

img1.png

47 ms

img2.png

img2.png

64 ms

Vector-3.svg

Vector-3.svg

49 ms

Vector-4.svg

Vector-4.svg

50 ms

Vector-5.svg

Vector-5.svg

63 ms

CircularStd-Book.sub.woff

CircularStd-Book.sub.woff

56 ms

CircularStd-Medium.sub.woff

CircularStd-Medium.sub.woff

69 ms

CircularStd-Bold.sub.woff

CircularStd-Bold.sub.woff

75 ms

shield-check.svg

shield-check.svg

29 ms

3ab80.default.include.3dbad7.css

3ab80.default.include.3dbad7.css

197 ms

3ab80.default.include-footer.bb6e5f.js

3ab80.default.include-footer.bb6e5f.js

208 ms

linkedin.svg

linkedin.svg

236 ms

twitter.svg

twitter.svg

234 ms

youtube.svg

youtube.svg

237 ms

instagram.svg

instagram.svg

235 ms

Handshake.svg

Handshake.svg

8 ms

eye.svg

eye.svg

7 ms

seal-check.svg

seal-check.svg

9 ms

image-2088.png

image-2088.png

600 ms

Roy-Milne.png

Roy-Milne.png

19 ms

Philip-Dewson.jpg

Philip-Dewson.jpg

19 ms

gregmarkham.png

gregmarkham.png

26 ms

Trevor-Payne.png

Trevor-Payne.png

24 ms

Rachel-Green.png

Rachel-Green.png

22 ms

Megaphone.svg

Megaphone.svg

20 ms

Users.svg

Users.svg

22 ms

Megaphone-1.svg

Megaphone-1.svg

23 ms

Timer.svg

Timer.svg

25 ms

user-list.svg

user-list.svg

23 ms

AvertaBold.sub.woff

AvertaBold.sub.woff

17 ms

AvertaSemibold.sub.woff

AvertaSemibold.sub.woff

15 ms

AvertaRegular.sub.woff

AvertaRegular.sub.woff

17 ms

Accessibility Review

comparesoft.com accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

comparesoft.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

comparesoft.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Comparesoft.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Comparesoft.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

comparesoft.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Comparesoft. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: