593 ms in total
264 ms
276 ms
53 ms
Visit comparing.ly now to see the best up-to-date Comparing content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about comparing.ly
The one-stop-shop to find comparison of small business solutions. Team Comparingly strives to provide honest and unbiased reviews for the small business services you need. When confused, choose Compar...
Visit comparing.lyWe analyzed Comparing.ly page load time and found that the first response time was 264 ms and then it took 329 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Comparing.ly rating and web reputation
comparing.ly performance score
264 ms
Our browser made a total of 1 request to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Comparing.ly and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (264 ms) belongs to the original domain Comparing.ly.
Page size can be reduced by 4.1 kB (3%)
142.4 kB
138.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Comparing.ly main page is 142.4 kB. This result falls within the top 5000 of lightweight and thus fast loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 141.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 311 B
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 311 B or 40% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
We found no issues to fix!
0
0
Besides the initial HTML request, no CSS, Javascripts, AJAX or image files were requested in the course of web page rendering.
comparing.ly
264 ms
comparing.ly SEO score
EN
N/A
N/A
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Comparing.ly can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Comparing.ly main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
comparing.ly
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Comparing. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: