Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

comparison.travel

The domain name comparison.travel is for sale

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

330 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

120 ms

comparison.travel screenshot

About Website

Welcome to comparison.travel homepage info - get ready to check Comparison best content for China right away, or after learning these important things about comparison.travel

The domain name comparison.travel is for sale. Make an offer or buy it now at a set price.

Visit comparison.travel

Key Findings

We analyzed Comparison.travel page load time and found that the first response time was 330 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

comparison.travel performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

www.comparison.travel

330 ms

protoaculous.1.8.2.min.js

326 ms

main.css

167 ms

style2.css

175 ms

include.js.php

187 ms

Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (60 requests) were addressed to the original Comparison.travel, 4% (3 requests) were made to Facebook.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Searchboth.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (497 ms) belongs to the original domain Comparison.travel.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 861.8 kB (58%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

615.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Comparison.travel main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 679.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 24.4 kB

  • Original 31.1 kB
  • After minification 24.6 kB
  • After compression 6.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.5 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.4 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 48.7 kB

  • Original 434.4 kB
  • After minification 385.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Comparison needs image optimization as it can save up to 48.7 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 494.4 kB

  • Original 679.6 kB
  • After minification 669.0 kB
  • After compression 185.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 494.4 kB or 73% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 294.2 kB

  • Original 332.0 kB
  • After minification 255.0 kB
  • After compression 37.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Comparison.travel needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 294.2 kB or 89% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (38%)

Requests Now

73

After Optimization

45

The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Comparison. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

comparison.travel SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Comparison.travel can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Comparison.travel main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Comparison. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: