5.8 sec in total
64 ms
5.1 sec
585 ms
Welcome to compatibility.co.uk homepage info - get ready to check Compatibility best content right away, or after learning these important things about compatibility.co.uk
Our goal is simply to make your IT systems work for you and remove the burden of IT so you can focus on your business. In fact, our customers see us as their
Visit compatibility.co.ukWe analyzed Compatibility.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 64 ms and then it took 5.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
compatibility.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.9 s
25/100
10%
Value7.4 s
4/100
25%
Value7.8 s
23/100
10%
Value650 ms
46/100
30%
Value0.089
92/100
15%
Value10.2 s
25/100
10%
64 ms
331 ms
354 ms
457 ms
529 ms
Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (69 requests) were addressed to the original Compatibility.co.uk, 15% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Compatibility.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 172.3 kB (12%)
1.4 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Compatibility.co.uk main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 978.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 92.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 92.6 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Compatibility images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 50.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 50.0 kB or 24% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Compatibility.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 18.1 kB or 18% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 53 (85%)
62
9
The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Compatibility. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 38 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
compatibility.co.uk
64 ms
theme.min.css
331 ms
style.css
354 ms
frontend.css
457 ms
style.min.css
529 ms
header-footer.min.css
361 ms
frontend.min.css
444 ms
post-5.css
645 ms
all.min.css
746 ms
v4-shims.min.css
672 ms
public.css
783 ms
e-animation-pulse.min.css
760 ms
widget-image.min.css
841 ms
widget-icon-list.min.css
1241 ms
widget-heading.min.css
1240 ms
widget-nav-menu.min.css
1266 ms
widget-text-editor.min.css
1265 ms
shapes.min.css
1179 ms
widget-divider.min.css
1177 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
1583 ms
swiper.min.css
1516 ms
e-swiper.min.css
1557 ms
frontend.min.css
1569 ms
fadeInUp.min.css
1596 ms
widget-slides.min.css
1588 ms
widget-call-to-action.min.css
1830 ms
post-9.css
1873 ms
post-67.css
1884 ms
post-120.css
1900 ms
style.css
1908 ms
css
59 ms
fontawesome.min.css
1992 ms
brands.min.css
2148 ms
solid.min.css
2243 ms
regular.min.css
2361 ms
post-591.css
2236 ms
post-595.css
2215 ms
post-935.css
2340 ms
e-animation-grow.min.css
2153 ms
jquery.min.js
2274 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
2277 ms
hello-frontend.min.js
2375 ms
hooks.min.js
2263 ms
vue.min.js
2255 ms
jet-menu-public-scripts.js
2174 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
2262 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
2197 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
2232 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
2297 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
2370 ms
i18n.min.js
1956 ms
frontend.min.js
2072 ms
core.min.js
2021 ms
frontend.min.js
2139 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
2143 ms
widgets-scripts.js
2193 ms
compatibility.png
894 ms
compatibility-transparent-logo-1.png
934 ms
london-skyline-at-night-2021-08-26-16-22-12-utc.jpg
1230 ms
it-support-operator-answering-question-using-heads-2021-09-24-02-52-04-utc.jpg
1277 ms
cropped-image-of-businesswoman-taking-handset-of-s-2022-12-16-17-11-33-utc.jpg
1369 ms
save-titme-save-move-portait.jpg
1272 ms
contact-us.jpg
1426 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff
57 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff
74 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-.woff
84 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzQ.woff
85 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff
84 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc-.woff
85 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
1428 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
1701 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
1820 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
1841 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
1759 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
1842 ms
eicons.woff
1946 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu51xIIzQ.woff
34 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51S7ACc6CsI.woff
31 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TjASc6CsI.woff
32 ms
KFOiCnqEu92Fr1Mu51QrEzAdKQ.woff
34 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TzBic6CsI.woff
35 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TLBCc6CsI.woff
35 ms
compatibility.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
compatibility.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
compatibility.co.uk SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
![]()
EN
![]()
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Compatibility.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Compatibility.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
compatibility.co.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Compatibility. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: