1.4 sec in total
412 ms
782 ms
250 ms
Visit competitionengineering.com now to see the best up-to-date Competitionengineering content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about competitionengineering.com
Visit competitionengineering.comWe analyzed Competitionengineering.com page load time and found that the first response time was 412 ms and then it took 1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
competitionengineering.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
49/100
10%
Value9.0 s
1/100
25%
Value5.8 s
49/100
10%
Value770 ms
38/100
30%
Value0.191
64/100
15%
Value14.9 s
8/100
10%
412 ms
16 ms
16 ms
17 ms
18 ms
Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Competitionengineering.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Cdn.jsdelivr.net and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (412 ms) belongs to the original domain Competitionengineering.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (65%)
1.7 MB
589.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Competitionengineering.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 873.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 20.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.9 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 13.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Competitionengineering images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 655.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 655.1 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 406.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Competitionengineering.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 406.0 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (67%)
60
20
The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Competitionengineering. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
competitionengineering.com
412 ms
system.base.css
16 ms
views_slideshow.css
16 ms
jquery.ui.core.css
17 ms
jquery.ui.theme.css
18 ms
jquery.ui.menu.css
17 ms
jquery.ui.autocomplete.css
19 ms
calendar_multiday.css
19 ms
date.css
19 ms
datepicker.1.7.css
20 ms
field.css
21 ms
node.css
21 ms
youtube.css
21 ms
views.css
22 ms
ctools.css
21 ms
views_slideshow_cycle.css
22 ms
user-blue.css
23 ms
basic-red.css
23 ms
basic-green.css
24 ms
bootstrap.css
26 ms
overrides.min.css
24 ms
style.css
35 ms
jquery.js
43 ms
jquery.once.js
34 ms
drupal.js
37 ms
jquery.ui.core.js
38 ms
jquery.ui.widget.js
38 ms
views_slideshow.js
39 ms
jquery.ui.position.js
39 ms
jquery.ui.menu.js
39 ms
jquery.ui.autocomplete.js
40 ms
bootstrap.js
17 ms
jquery.cycle.all.js
39 ms
views_slideshow_cycle.js
70 ms
jquery.autocomplete.js
70 ms
myscript.js
71 ms
embed.js
128 ms
bootstrap.js
70 ms
EmailList.png
57 ms
edX3RiH8EG8
142 ms
analytics.js
50 ms
morosobg.jpg
52 ms
MorosoQuickLinks.png
46 ms
MWTLogo.png
47 ms
MorosoLOGO.png
48 ms
CELOGO_3.png
49 ms
MorosoTagLine.png
48 ms
Hellcat.jpg
51 ms
Slide-a-link.jpg
51 ms
Rollbars.jpg
53 ms
Drag%20Shocks.jpg
54 ms
fb-badge.png
53 ms
youtube-badge.png
51 ms
SnyderSpeedBrush.woff
55 ms
collect
48 ms
313a8d6433e3.png
44 ms
bd9c9499c074.png
32 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
63 ms
www-embed-player.js
84 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
57 ms
ad_status.js
37 ms
competitionengineering.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
competitionengineering.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
competitionengineering.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Competitionengineering.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Competitionengineering.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
competitionengineering.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Competitionengineering. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: