Report Summary

  • 41

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    60% of other websites

  • 51

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 21% of websites

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

competitionlawyer.in

   | The Antitrust Attorney Blog - By MM Sharma

Page Load Speed

22.1 sec in total

First Response

7.8 sec

Resources Loaded

13.8 sec

Page Rendered

476 ms

competitionlawyer.in screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Competitionlawyer content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about competitionlawyer.in

by MM Sharma

Visit competitionlawyer.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Competitionlawyer.in page load time and found that the first response time was 7.8 sec and then it took 14.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

competitionlawyer.in performance score

41

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

10/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.7 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.4 s

28/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value310 ms

78/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.145

77/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.7 s

17/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

competitionlawyer.in

7804 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

961 ms

styles.css

663 ms

css

25 ms

main.min.css

2575 ms

Our browser made a total of 22 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Competitionlawyer.in, 14% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 9% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (7.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Competitionlawyer.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (73%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

484.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Competitionlawyer.in main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 50.9 kB

  • Original 72.2 kB
  • After minification 70.3 kB
  • After compression 21.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 50.9 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 22.5 kB

  • Original 187.8 kB
  • After minification 165.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Competitionlawyer needs image optimization as it can save up to 22.5 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 369.3 kB

  • Original 533.6 kB
  • After minification 533.5 kB
  • After compression 164.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 369.3 kB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 869.6 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 958.6 kB
  • After compression 133.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Competitionlawyer.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 869.6 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (72%)

Requests Now

18

After Optimization

5

The browser has sent 18 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Competitionlawyer. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

competitionlawyer.in accessibility score

51

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

SEO Factors

competitionlawyer.in SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Competitionlawyer.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Competitionlawyer.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Competitionlawyer. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: