Tools & Wizards About Us
competitorpricemonitoring.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

competitorpricemonitoring.com

Competitor Price Monitoring - Tool Comparison Platform

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

134 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

128 ms

competitorpricemonitoring.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Competitor Price Monitoring content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about competitorpricemonitoring.com

Many competitor price monitoring tools available, which one is the right one for you? We've tested more than a dozen different competitor price monitoring..

Visit competitorpricemonitoring.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Competitorpricemonitoring.com page load time and found that the first response time was 134 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

competitorpricemonitoring.com performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.3 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.5 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.3 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,090 ms

24/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.031

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.6 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

competitorpricemonitoring.com

134 ms

www.competitorpricemonitoring.com

816 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

62 ms

webfonts.css

102 ms

bootstrap.min.css

136 ms

Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (63 requests) were addressed to the original Competitorpricemonitoring.com, 6% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (816 ms) belongs to the original domain Competitorpricemonitoring.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 494.6 kB (45%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

604.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Competitorpricemonitoring.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 556.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 42.4 kB

  • Original 53.3 kB
  • After minification 50.4 kB
  • After compression 10.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.4 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 7.8 kB

  • Original 300.1 kB
  • After minification 292.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Competitor Price Monitoring images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 399.4 kB

  • Original 556.4 kB
  • After minification 541.5 kB
  • After compression 157.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 399.4 kB or 72% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 45.0 kB

  • Original 189.2 kB
  • After minification 189.0 kB
  • After compression 144.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Competitorpricemonitoring.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 45.0 kB or 24% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (82%)

Requests Now

61

After Optimization

11

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Competitor Price Monitoring. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 27 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

competitorpricemonitoring.com

competitorpricemonitoring.com

134 ms

www.competitorpricemonitoring.com

www.competitorpricemonitoring.com

816 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

62 ms

webfonts.css

webfonts.css

102 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

136 ms

background.css

background.css

104 ms

style.css

style.css

149 ms

reset.css

reset.css

147 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

153 ms

simple-line-icons.css

simple-line-icons.css

156 ms

et-line-font.css

et-line-font.css

162 ms

responsive-leyouts.css

responsive-leyouts.css

179 ms

menu.css

menu.css

181 ms

sky-forms.css

sky-forms.css

191 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

199 ms

cubeportfolio.min.css

cubeportfolio.min.css

206 ms

green.css

green.css

213 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

236 ms

classic-themes.min.css

classic-themes.min.css

217 ms

styles.css

styles.css

234 ms

settings.css

settings.css

247 ms

wpcf7-redirect-frontend.min.css

wpcf7-redirect-frontend.min.css

251 ms

ivory-search.min.css

ivory-search.min.css

260 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

258 ms

style.css

style.css

276 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

329 ms

custom.css

custom.css

294 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

361 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

307 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

392 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

359 ms

custom.js

custom.js

350 ms

js

js

48 ms

css

css

36 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

355 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

375 ms

wpcf7-redirect-frontend-script.js

wpcf7-redirect-frontend-script.js

386 ms

pageloader.js

pageloader.js

422 ms

maxhost-main.js

maxhost-main.js

423 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

423 ms

jquery.easing.min.js

jquery.easing.min.js

368 ms

animations.min.js

animations.min.js

381 ms

appear.min.js

appear.min.js

378 ms

jquery.cubeportfolio.min.js

jquery.cubeportfolio.min.js

393 ms

main5.js

main5.js

337 ms

sticky.js

sticky.js

331 ms

owl.carousel.js

owl.carousel.js

328 ms

custom.js

custom.js

380 ms

totop.js

totop.js

375 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

363 ms

ivory-search.min.js

ivory-search.min.js

364 ms

css

css

18 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

358 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

64 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

204 ms

cropped-logo_competitorpricemonitoring_2.jpg

cropped-logo_competitorpricemonitoring_2.jpg

135 ms

slider-bg1.jpg

slider-bg1.jpg

271 ms

site-img85.jpg

site-img85.jpg

204 ms

title-line.png

title-line.png

81 ms

bg-texture-2.png

bg-texture-2.png

150 ms

scroll-top-arrow.png

scroll-top-arrow.png

150 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxPKTU1Kg.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxPKTU1Kg.ttf

133 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf

133 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzcXKMny.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzcXKMny.ttf

146 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf

154 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

115 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

161 ms

Simple-Line-Icons.woff

Simple-Line-Icons.woff

141 ms

et-line.woff

et-line.woff

128 ms

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

136 ms

revolution.extension.actions.min.js

revolution.extension.actions.min.js

153 ms

Accessibility Review

competitorpricemonitoring.com accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Best Practices

competitorpricemonitoring.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

competitorpricemonitoring.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Competitorpricemonitoring.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Competitorpricemonitoring.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

competitorpricemonitoring.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Competitor Price Monitoring. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: