3.2 sec in total
186 ms
2.7 sec
266 ms
Click here to check amazing Competitor Price Monitoring content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about competitorpricemonitoring.com
Many competitor price monitoring tools available, which one is the right one for you? We've tested more than a dozen different competitor price monitoring..
Visit competitorpricemonitoring.comWe analyzed Competitorpricemonitoring.com page load time and found that the first response time was 186 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
competitorpricemonitoring.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.6 s
2/100
10%
Value15.8 s
0/100
25%
Value21.0 s
0/100
10%
Value13,080 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.019
100/100
15%
Value22.8 s
1/100
10%
186 ms
855 ms
48 ms
99 ms
177 ms
Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (62 requests) were addressed to the original Competitorpricemonitoring.com, 4% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (855 ms) belongs to the original domain Competitorpricemonitoring.com.
Page size can be reduced by 102.8 kB (16%)
653.0 kB
550.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Competitorpricemonitoring.com main page is 653.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 300.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 33.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.9 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Competitor Price Monitoring images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 19.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 19.1 kB or 14% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 41.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Competitorpricemonitoring.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 41.9 kB or 24% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (77%)
65
15
The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Competitor Price Monitoring. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
competitorpricemonitoring.com
186 ms
www.competitorpricemonitoring.com
855 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
48 ms
webfonts.css
99 ms
bootstrap.min.css
177 ms
background.css
126 ms
style.css
154 ms
reset.css
169 ms
font-awesome.min.css
192 ms
simple-line-icons.css
171 ms
et-line-font.css
173 ms
responsive-leyouts.css
195 ms
menu.css
230 ms
sky-forms.css
234 ms
animations.min.css
220 ms
cubeportfolio.min.css
238 ms
green.css
230 ms
style.min.css
249 ms
styles.css
264 ms
settings.css
266 ms
wpcf7-redirect-frontend.min.css
262 ms
ivory-search.min.css
271 ms
frontend.min.css
292 ms
style.css
337 ms
js_composer.min.css
369 ms
custom.css
340 ms
jquery.js
354 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
366 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
348 ms
custom.js
544 ms
js
73 ms
css
46 ms
scripts.js
555 ms
wpcf7-redirect-frontend-script.js
555 ms
pageloader.js
556 ms
maxhost-main.js
556 ms
bootstrap.min.js
557 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
557 ms
animations.min.js
558 ms
appear.min.js
538 ms
jquery.cubeportfolio.min.js
531 ms
main5.js
480 ms
sticky.js
453 ms
owl.carousel.js
421 ms
custom.js
410 ms
totop.js
408 ms
comment-reply.min.js
393 ms
ivory-search.min.js
393 ms
wp-embed.min.js
387 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
385 ms
css
15 ms
gtm.js
74 ms
loading.gif
68 ms
cropped-logo_competitorpricemonitoring_2.jpg
66 ms
slider-bg1.jpg
261 ms
site-img85.jpg
127 ms
title-line.png
86 ms
bg-texture-2.png
200 ms
scroll-top-arrow.png
87 ms
js
181 ms
analytics.js
175 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff
175 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzQ.woff
176 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
265 ms
Simple-Line-Icons.woff
118 ms
et-line.woff
117 ms
revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js
181 ms
revolution.extension.actions.min.js
176 ms
revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js
182 ms
collect
137 ms
collect
78 ms
loader.gif
78 ms
competitorpricemonitoring.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
competitorpricemonitoring.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
competitorpricemonitoring.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Competitorpricemonitoring.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Competitorpricemonitoring.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
competitorpricemonitoring.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Competitor Price Monitoring. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: