Tools & Wizards About Us
completebody.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

completebody.com

COMPLETEBODY | GYM | Personal Training | Manhattan's Exclusive Fitness Clubs

Page Load Speed

2.9 sec in total

First Response

85 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

549 ms

completebody.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to completebody.com homepage info - get ready to check COMPLETEBODY best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about completebody.com

Discover top-notch GYM facilities, diverse fitness classes, and expert trainers, fueling your journey to a stronger, healthier self in the heart of the New York City

Visit completebody.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Completebody.com page load time and found that the first response time was 85 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

completebody.com performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

10/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value29.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value20.5 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,380 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value44.4 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

completebody.com

85 ms

www.completebody.com

1195 ms

autoptimize_4dd073c9f6d677f91fdde333334fd689.css

274 ms

autoptimize_single_e1156de8f17975fcb6ae7eaed1781df5.css

77 ms

autoptimize_single_1ad6fb125fa8b9c19d1e25f7c94baf45.css

77 ms

Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Completebody.com, 7% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Completebody.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 901.5 kB (14%)

Content Size

6.3 MB

After Optimization

5.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Completebody.com main page is 6.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 116.2 kB

  • Original 132.5 kB
  • After minification 132.4 kB
  • After compression 16.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 116.2 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 40.8 kB

  • Original 4.6 MB
  • After minification 4.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. COMPLETEBODY images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 125.0 kB

  • Original 945.8 kB
  • After minification 945.8 kB
  • After compression 820.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 125.0 kB or 13% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-99%

Potential reduce by 619.4 kB

  • Original 626.2 kB
  • After minification 8.0 kB
  • After compression 6.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Completebody.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 619.4 kB or 99% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (51%)

Requests Now

37

After Optimization

18

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of COMPLETEBODY. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

completebody.com

completebody.com

85 ms

www.completebody.com

www.completebody.com

1195 ms

autoptimize_4dd073c9f6d677f91fdde333334fd689.css

autoptimize_4dd073c9f6d677f91fdde333334fd689.css

274 ms

autoptimize_single_e1156de8f17975fcb6ae7eaed1781df5.css

autoptimize_single_e1156de8f17975fcb6ae7eaed1781df5.css

77 ms

autoptimize_single_1ad6fb125fa8b9c19d1e25f7c94baf45.css

autoptimize_single_1ad6fb125fa8b9c19d1e25f7c94baf45.css

77 ms

autoptimize_single_1a0280ff89dc57e2eca8842588f23c0b.css

autoptimize_single_1a0280ff89dc57e2eca8842588f23c0b.css

79 ms

style_dynamic_callback.php

style_dynamic_callback.php

494 ms

style_dynamic_responsive_callback.php

style_dynamic_responsive_callback.php

393 ms

css

css

43 ms

css

css

47 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

120 ms

js

js

71 ms

autoptimize_single_f421f00eedefcb0c687c44a2c24a175d.css

autoptimize_single_f421f00eedefcb0c687c44a2c24a175d.css

98 ms

css

css

44 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

97 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

121 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

120 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

141 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

150 ms

a11y.min.js

a11y.min.js

150 ms

js

js

118 ms

default_dynamic_callback.php

default_dynamic_callback.php

713 ms

autoptimize_bd145a9a14c6196de7600ecaa68f9166.js

autoptimize_bd145a9a14c6196de7600ecaa68f9166.js

380 ms

completebody-logo-retina.png

completebody-logo-retina.png

112 ms

logo_black.png

logo_black.png

110 ms

14Street-2.png

14Street-2.png

214 ms

14Street-1.png

14Street-1.png

207 ms

H1A1955.jpg

H1A1955.jpg

110 ms

The-long-one-scaled.jpg

The-long-one-scaled.jpg

209 ms

training-1.png

training-1.png

112 ms

DSC05872.jpg

DSC05872.jpg

209 ms

CompleteFitness-HanoverSq57thSt-35.png

CompleteFitness-HanoverSq57thSt-35.png

210 ms

Accolades-Salon-Spa-Facial.png

Accolades-Salon-Spa-Facial.png

111 ms

JuiceBar-e1595514531785.png

JuiceBar-e1595514531785.png

205 ms

Pool.jpg

Pool.jpg

207 ms

Complete-Logo-300x89.png

Complete-Logo-300x89.png

210 ms

CompleteBoduy-logo-19th-300x94.png

CompleteBoduy-logo-19th-300x94.png

210 ms

Completebody-logo-FiDi-300x94.png

Completebody-logo-FiDi-300x94.png

210 ms

Completebody-logo-midtown-300x89.png

Completebody-logo-midtown-300x89.png

211 ms

PFDinTextPro-Regular_35424.ttf

PFDinTextPro-Regular_35424.ttf

78 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

77 ms

fa-brands-400.ttf

fa-brands-400.ttf

77 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

78 ms

Accessibility Review

completebody.com accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

completebody.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

completebody.com SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Completebody.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Completebody.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

completebody.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of COMPLETEBODY. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: