5.8 sec in total
918 ms
4.5 sec
310 ms
Click here to check amazing Computer Runner content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about computerrunner.com
Computer Runner constantly persists to meet the computer service needs of its customers through innovative solutions. Click to see our services...
Visit computerrunner.comWe analyzed Computerrunner.com page load time and found that the first response time was 918 ms and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
computerrunner.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value11.7 s
0/100
10%
Value23.1 s
0/100
25%
Value18.3 s
0/100
10%
Value1,410 ms
15/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value24.5 s
0/100
10%
918 ms
50 ms
140 ms
94 ms
104 ms
Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Computerrunner.com, 8% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Static.mailerlite.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (918 ms) belongs to the original domain Computerrunner.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (59%)
2.5 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Computerrunner.com main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 91.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 91.0 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 529 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Computer Runner images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 769.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 769.6 kB or 56% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 610.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Computerrunner.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 610.6 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 49 (80%)
61
12
The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Computer Runner. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.computerrunner.com
918 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
50 ms
style.min.css
140 ms
styles.css
94 ms
mailerlite_forms.css
104 ms
rs6.css
187 ms
style.css
134 ms
base.css
180 ms
layout.css
233 ms
shortcodes.css
246 ms
animations.min.css
225 ms
jquery.ui.all.css
184 ms
jplayer.blue.monday.css
223 ms
responsive.css
241 ms
css
32 ms
style.min.css
244 ms
link-buttons.min.css
262 ms
animate.min.css
296 ms
spinkit.min.css
273 ms
jquery.min.js
288 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
283 ms
rbtools.min.js
313 ms
rs6.min.js
388 ms
js
66 ms
fonts.css
333 ms
css
36 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
334 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
334 ms
index.js
339 ms
core.min.js
347 ms
mouse.min.js
365 ms
sortable.min.js
378 ms
tabs.min.js
376 ms
accordion.min.js
383 ms
plugins.js
428 ms
menu.js
427 ms
animations.min.js
484 ms
jplayer.min.js
486 ms
translate3d.js
485 ms
api.js
65 ms
scripts.js
484 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
450 ms
index.js
404 ms
script.min.js
397 ms
ads.js
366 ms
universal.js
95 ms
Webp.net-resizeimage-4-1.png
92 ms
computerrunner-homepage-slider-.jpg
207 ms
cr-stars.png
102 ms
computer-and-laptop-repaire-homepage.jpg
102 ms
on_site_cr_homepage.jpg
110 ms
web-design-homepage.jpg
117 ms
get-to-know-us.jpg
137 ms
itservice2_pic1.png
141 ms
itservice2_pic6-copy-min.png
70 ms
embed
187 ms
footer-back3.jpg
111 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf
26 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf
32 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf
35 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf
37 ms
mfn-icons.woff
58 ms
pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLucHtF.ttf
36 ms
pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmy15VF9eL.ttf
36 ms
universal.css
62 ms
js
73 ms
recaptcha__en.js
75 ms
search.js
3 ms
geometry.js
7 ms
main.js
54 ms
z1r9z3y6u2_popups.js
149 ms
embed.js
120 ms
computerrunner.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
computerrunner.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
computerrunner.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Computerrunner.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Computerrunner.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
computerrunner.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Computer Runner. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: