2.8 sec in total
56 ms
2.5 sec
235 ms
Visit computeruser.com now to see the best up-to-date Computer User content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about computeruser.com
ComputerUser provides tech videos, technology reviews, articles, news on software, hardware, electronics, gadgets.Computer User has been the online tech authority for over thirty years
Visit computeruser.comWe analyzed Computeruser.com page load time and found that the first response time was 56 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
computeruser.com performance score
56 ms
1206 ms
22 ms
72 ms
94 ms
Our browser made a total of 92 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 60% of them (55 requests) were addressed to the original Computeruser.com, 5% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Computeruser.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (71%)
2.0 MB
580.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Computeruser.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 86.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 86.0 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 21.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Computer User needs image optimization as it can save up to 21.7 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 842.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 842.4 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 437.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Computeruser.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 437.6 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 62 (74%)
84
22
The browser has sent 84 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Computer User. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 42 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
computeruser.com
56 ms
www.computeruser.com
1206 ms
css
22 ms
style.css.pagespeed.ce.bVbxYZUCL3.css
72 ms
jqueryuicss.css,qver=4.3.1.pagespeed.ce.f15wBG85OL.css
94 ms
xyz_cfm_shortcode_style.css,qver=4.3.1.pagespeed.ce.sFH8PVk2vo.css
99 ms
jquery-ui.css
32 ms
bbpress.css,qver=2.5.7-5693.pagespeed.ce.g4WR2mh-hP.css
96 ms
style.min.css,qver=4.3.1.pagespeed.ce.pTvj-j6JPU.css
90 ms
front.css,qver=4.3.1.pagespeed.ce.-i4mqaMzQR.css
500 ms
bootstrap.css,qver=4.3.1.pagespeed.ce.9bMOswW3Ay.css
102 ms
events_manager.css,qver=5.5401.pagespeed.ce.dOTMbf-Ig4.css
114 ms
name_directory.css,qver=4.3.1.pagespeed.ce.bpY5g_zsAX.css
101 ms
style.css,qver=4.3.1.pagespeed.ce.t1HEttMNAi.css
98 ms
chosen.css,qver=4.3.1.pagespeed.ce.Vsa_OxYQ1h.css
98 ms
frontend.css,qver=4.3.1.pagespeed.ce.pq7qO5pVWj.css
126 ms
frontend-forms.css,qver=4.3.1.pagespeed.ce.6xbjqBCcCS.css
128 ms
jquery-ui-1.9.1.custom.css,qver=4.3.1.pagespeed.ce.rrZV4CRhHN.css
128 ms
public.css,qver=2.1.5.pagespeed.ce.JXGpragI-V.css
132 ms
styles.css,qver=4.3.1.pagespeed.ce.DMewxN3RZo.css
133 ms
widgets.min.css,qver=4.3.1.pagespeed.ce.TQhXxdFkru.css
169 ms
jquery.plupload.queue.css,qver=2.1.1.pagespeed.ce.pbMljdKgIQ.css
165 ms
awpcpstyle.css,qver=3.5.3.pagespeed.ce.jK_7rsXYml.css
166 ms
jquery.min.js
107 ms
jqueryuijs.js,qver=4.3.1.pagespeed.ce._mc_sotnO-.js
270 ms
core.min.js,qver=1.11.4.pagespeed.ce.IE0Vc-X5rQ.js
169 ms
datepicker.min.js,qver=1.11.4.pagespeed.ce.guKKrg40oH.js
227 ms
script.min.js,qver=4.3.1.pagespeed.ce.GwfuyWsNqq.js
224 ms
front.js,qver=4.3.1.pagespeed.ce.OsstuJE5kM.js
222 ms
widget.min.js,qver=1.11.4.pagespeed.ce.C7CvCGk0HM.js
229 ms
position.min.js,qver=1.11.4.pagespeed.ce.k5bXGaTq3e.js
251 ms
mouse.min.js,qver=1.11.4.pagespeed.ce.5KE4J12o7S.js
252 ms
sortable.min.js,qver=1.11.4.pagespeed.ce.DtMWzlh3Gw.js
254 ms
menu.min.js,qver=1.11.4.pagespeed.ce.J5tZ_9Pm7S.js
256 ms
autocomplete.min.js,qver=1.11.4.pagespeed.ce.h4SLUNi1Q7.js
280 ms
resizable.min.js,qver=1.11.4.pagespeed.ce.PwSyKuriV5.js
281 ms
draggable.min.js,qver=1.11.4.pagespeed.ce.UAtW8WSZrU.js
283 ms
button.min.js,qver=1.11.4.pagespeed.ce.bg4EXT_kdm.js
286 ms
dialog.min.js,qver=1.11.4.pagespeed.ce.JANhVvUTe9.js
296 ms
events-manager.js,qver=5.5401.pagespeed.ce.p5rDSdLlL6.js
311 ms
js
84 ms
jquery-migrate-1.2.1.min.js
5 ms
adsbygoogle.js
6 ms
brand
19 ms
frontend-form.js,qver=4.3.1.pagespeed.ce.YR-r9JdXup.js
305 ms
brand
81 ms
plupload.full.min.js,qver=2.1.1.pagespeed.ce.k0n2NsdHpe.js
278 ms
handlers.min.js,qver=4.3.1.pagespeed.ce.gTzrYGEqNl.js
232 ms
jquery-ui-timepicker-addon.js,qver=4.3.1.pagespeed.ce.66qpeCQbMC.js
264 ms
upload.js,qver=4.3.1.pagespeed.ce.i1qcwW_YSY.js
252 ms
scripts.js,qver=4.3.1.pagespeed.ce.UoPabtekva.js
254 ms
editor.js,qver=2.5.7-5693.pagespeed.ce.W2_yl2LLxO.js
253 ms
jquery.form.min.js,qver=3.37.0.pagespeed.ce.28OAhHPe8A.js
276 ms
conditional-logic.js,qver=4.3.1.pagespeed.ce.yK4MbqbMlX.js
267 ms
subscriptions.js,qver=4.3.1.pagespeed.ce.U9p5qfx9oy.js
271 ms
suggest.min.js,qver=1.1-20110113.pagespeed.ce.Iaee3gT6Xu.js
270 ms
slider.min.js,qver=1.11.4.pagespeed.ce.fQkxbDTfJo.js
285 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
305 ms
css
13 ms
logo.png.pagespeed.ce.4060EDvjSz.png
62 ms
mqdefault.jpg
26 ms
mqdefault.jpg
51 ms
mqdefault.jpg
52 ms
facebook.png.pagespeed.ce.a73AbwgdrG.png
51 ms
twitter.png.pagespeed.ce.aARfwwQXtX.png
51 ms
google-plus.png.pagespeed.ce.IhPlV6aw0l.png
50 ms
rss.png.pagespeed.ce.kTRxByRUj8.png
49 ms
FUDHvzEKSJww3kCxuiAo2A.ttf
21 ms
ca-pub-8772086181989336.js
132 ms
zrt_lookup.html
75 ms
show_ads_impl.js
75 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
34 ms
google_custom_search_watermark.gif
151 ms
ads
164 ms
analytics.js
61 ms
osd.js
59 ms
all.js
82 ms
ads
241 ms
collect
26 ms
204 ms
xd_arbiter.php
221 ms
xd_arbiter.php
429 ms
m_js_controller.js
41 ms
abg.js
55 ms
favicon
72 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
50 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
20 ms
s
31 ms
x_button_blue2.png
25 ms
7-1I540iwtLQZRDhQUP9L-vt70m6ZeYTcveWqB03r34.js
19 ms
favicon
37 ms
ui
16 ms
computeruser.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Computeruser.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Computeruser.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
computeruser.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Computer User. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: