Tools & Wizards About Us
conception-web-eclipse.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 29

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    49% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

conception-web-eclipse.com

ECLIPSE | Conception de Sites Web | Conception Web Longueuil

Page Load Speed

2.2 sec in total

First Response

80 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

62 ms

conception-web-eclipse.com screenshot

About Website

Visit conception-web-eclipse.com now to see the best up-to-date Conception Web ECLIPSE content for Canada and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about conception-web-eclipse.com

Boostez votre présence en ligne avec ECLIPSE, Expert en conception de sites web à Longueuil. Profitez de notre expertise de plus de 10 ans pour améliorer votre positionnement et référencement Google. ...

Visit conception-web-eclipse.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Conception-web-eclipse.com page load time and found that the first response time was 80 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

conception-web-eclipse.com performance score

29

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

68/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.6 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.3 s

59/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,240 ms

19/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.186

66/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.8 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.conception-web-eclipse.com

80 ms

minified.js

29 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

28 ms

polyfill.min.js

1136 ms

thunderbolt-commons.718dbdea.bundle.min.js

44 ms

Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Conception-web-eclipse.com, 38% (20 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 32% (17 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Polyfill-fastly.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 889.8 kB (49%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

924.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Conception-web-eclipse.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 932.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 745.4 kB

  • Original 932.0 kB
  • After minification 930.2 kB
  • After compression 186.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 745.4 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 140.8 kB

  • Original 638.2 kB
  • After minification 497.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Conception Web ECLIPSE needs image optimization as it can save up to 140.8 kB or 22% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.6 kB

  • Original 244.1 kB
  • After minification 244.1 kB
  • After compression 240.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (37%)

Requests Now

27

After Optimization

17

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Conception Web ECLIPSE. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.conception-web-eclipse.com

www.conception-web-eclipse.com

80 ms

minified.js

minified.js

29 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

28 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

1136 ms

thunderbolt-commons.718dbdea.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.718dbdea.bundle.min.js

44 ms

main.a041a540.bundle.min.js

main.a041a540.bundle.min.js

46 ms

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

42 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

46 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

44 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

46 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

45 ms

e0ad6f_ef1ba33ce2b54343beea4e08642ffcc8~mv2.png

e0ad6f_ef1ba33ce2b54343beea4e08642ffcc8~mv2.png

305 ms

eclipse_logo_20_modifi%C3%A9.png

eclipse_logo_20_modifi%C3%A9.png

595 ms

11062b_38e59a8142f94a6b91a2840fadc2a6abf000.jpg

11062b_38e59a8142f94a6b91a2840fadc2a6abf000.jpg

304 ms

e0ad6f_fe68130672da4387b88c8fe3c3409c45~mv2.png

e0ad6f_fe68130672da4387b88c8fe3c3409c45~mv2.png

508 ms

e0ad6f_577cfb3319f947729dde7e99894fd6ba~mv2.jpg

e0ad6f_577cfb3319f947729dde7e99894fd6ba~mv2.jpg

463 ms

e0ad6f_b81681c691224a328261a9d21b86e848~mv2.png

e0ad6f_b81681c691224a328261a9d21b86e848~mv2.png

465 ms

e0ad6f_495b6c9e0ec148b9b8c687e0af32da3d~mv2.png

e0ad6f_495b6c9e0ec148b9b8c687e0af32da3d~mv2.png

469 ms

e0ad6f_6541b9fa83c9474890f91bf5a8795a33~mv2.png

e0ad6f_6541b9fa83c9474890f91bf5a8795a33~mv2.png

756 ms

e0ad6f_88f184208a1f45fa8b8d3a4ddb195fe7~mv2.jpg

e0ad6f_88f184208a1f45fa8b8d3a4ddb195fe7~mv2.jpg

657 ms

tattoo%201.jpg

tattoo%201.jpg

771 ms

tattoo%202.jpg

tattoo%202.jpg

695 ms

e0ad6f_1cea7c818e264878baaf1503e7212bfe~mv2.png

e0ad6f_1cea7c818e264878baaf1503e7212bfe~mv2.png

764 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

79 ms

file.woff

file.woff

366 ms

file.woff

file.woff

394 ms

file.woff

file.woff

413 ms

file.woff

file.woff

412 ms

file.woff

file.woff

412 ms

c5749443-93da-4592-b794-42f28d62ef72.woff

c5749443-93da-4592-b794-42f28d62ef72.woff

38 ms

192dac76-a6d9-413d-bb74-22308f2e0cc5.woff

192dac76-a6d9-413d-bb74-22308f2e0cc5.woff

56 ms

0a3939d0-3833-4db3-8b85-f64c2b3350d2.woff

0a3939d0-3833-4db3-8b85-f64c2b3350d2.woff

38 ms

03805817-4611-4dbc-8c65-0f73031c3973.woff

03805817-4611-4dbc-8c65-0f73031c3973.woff

55 ms

80c34ad2-27c2-4d99-90fa-985fd64ab81a.woff

80c34ad2-27c2-4d99-90fa-985fd64ab81a.woff

57 ms

121 ms

114 ms

118 ms

118 ms

117 ms

113 ms

158 ms

155 ms

153 ms

152 ms

150 ms

147 ms

deprecation-fr.v5.html

deprecation-fr.v5.html

5 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

19 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

4 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

12 ms

WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff

WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff

6 ms

WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff

WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff

6 ms

WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff

WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff

5 ms

Accessibility Review

conception-web-eclipse.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

conception-web-eclipse.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

conception-web-eclipse.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    FR

  • Language Claimed

    FR

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Conception-web-eclipse.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Conception-web-eclipse.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

conception-web-eclipse.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Conception Web ECLIPSE. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: