Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 69

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 35% of websites

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

29 ms

Resources Loaded

882 ms

Page Rendered

861 ms

concreteconstruction.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Concreteconstruction content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about concreteconstruction.net

CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION: The latest in construction methods, materials and equipment for concrete contractors and specifiers, including commercial, residential, and decorative concrete resources.

Visit concreteconstruction.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Concreteconstruction.net page load time and found that the first response time was 29 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

concreteconstruction.net performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

concreteconstruction.net

29 ms

www.concreteconstruction.net

277 ms

jQuery.js

8 ms

1017897586.js

84 ms

optimizelyForDfp.js

21 ms

Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 60% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Concreteconstruction.net, 5% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Gtrk.s3.amazonaws.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (307 ms) relates to the external source Concreteconstruction.hw.curationdesk.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (17%)

Content Size

7.9 MB

After Optimization

6.6 MB

In fact, the total size of Concreteconstruction.net main page is 7.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 7.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 82.8 kB

  • Original 101.8 kB
  • After minification 93.4 kB
  • After compression 18.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 82.8 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 693.3 kB

  • Original 7.0 MB
  • After minification 6.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Concreteconstruction images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 455.2 kB

  • Original 695.4 kB
  • After minification 669.0 kB
  • After compression 240.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 455.2 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 111.7 kB

  • Original 137.6 kB
  • After minification 137.0 kB
  • After compression 25.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Concreteconstruction.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 111.7 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (34%)

Requests Now

58

After Optimization

38

The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Concreteconstruction. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

concreteconstruction.net accessibility score

69

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

SEO Factors

concreteconstruction.net SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Concreteconstruction.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Concreteconstruction.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Concreteconstruction. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: