17.9 sec in total
239 ms
15.7 sec
1.9 sec
Welcome to concurringopinions.com homepage info - get ready to check Concurringopinions best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about concurringopinions.com
Visit concurringopinions.comWe analyzed Concurringopinions.com page load time and found that the first response time was 239 ms and then it took 17.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.
concurringopinions.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.8 s
11/100
10%
Value9.6 s
0/100
25%
Value11.1 s
6/100
10%
Value730 ms
40/100
30%
Value0.396
26/100
15%
Value14.3 s
9/100
10%
239 ms
144 ms
142 ms
130 ms
156 ms
Our browser made a total of 87 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 57% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Concurringopinions.com, 11% (10 requests) were made to Graph.facebook.com and 6% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (14.1 sec) relates to the external source Share.yandex.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 696.1 kB (27%)
2.6 MB
1.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Concurringopinions.com main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 266.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 37.4 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 266.5 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 86.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Concurringopinions images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 238.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 238.6 kB or 57% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 104.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Concurringopinions.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 104.6 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (35%)
85
55
The browser has sent 85 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Concurringopinions. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
concurringopinions.com
239 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
144 ms
avatar-manager.min.css
142 ms
styles.css
130 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
156 ms
pagenavi-css.css
174 ms
style.css
146 ms
responsive.css
197 ms
font-awesome.min.css
218 ms
widget.css
207 ms
jquery.js
220 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
232 ms
avatar-manager.min.js
247 ms
jquery.flexslider.min.js
280 ms
jquery.min.js
30 ms
social-likes.min.js
272 ms
adsbygoogle.js
5 ms
jquery.form.min.js
214 ms
scripts.js
199 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
233 ms
light.js
254 ms
jquery.jplayer.min.js
263 ms
scripts.js
270 ms
widget.js
257 ms
wp-embed.min.js
283 ms
style.css
251 ms
analytics.js
36 ms
67df71bab466c213db0ef0dba8c65d32
88 ms
COOP_Logo.png
88 ms
opacity-10.png
88 ms
s-right-s1.png
85 ms
CFP-1-300x198.jpg
217 ms
Screen-Shot-2016-02-27-at-8.15.28-AM-300x255.jpg
163 ms
Screen-Shot-2015-09-22-at-10.47.11-PM-300x245-300x245.jpg
165 ms
IMG_3804.jpg
1179 ms
Justice_William_O_Douglas.jpg
164 ms
stairway-to-heaven-1319562-m-720x340-720x340.jpg
165 ms
51ehXfR3Y6L._SY344_PJlook-inside-v2TopRight10_SH20_BO1204203200_.jpg
265 ms
NothingToHide2011.jpeg
241 ms
nyup-2_concurringops_2013-08-FINAL.gif
1149 ms
BBB-COver2.png
1149 ms
WMS-210x315.jpg
1155 ms
pasquale-frank1-55x55.jpg
1143 ms
297d7819e1680ad8956e2d.L._V378630889_SX200_-55x55.jpg
1150 ms
Daniel-55x55.jpg
1150 ms
hoffman-edited1-55x55.jpg
1150 ms
desai-deven-55x55.jpg
1154 ms
Cunningham_20091-55x55.jpg
1172 ms
My-book-photo-55x55.jpg
1175 ms
wenger1-55x55.jpg
1172 ms
waldeck-sarah4-55x55.jpg
1173 ms
maldonado-solangel2-55x55.jpg
1174 ms
yung1-55x55.jpg
1175 ms
ef9eff19bf6fb47c5cef995a83afef28
109 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1150 ms
collect
45 ms
ca-pub-6691016535247776.js
47 ms
zrt_lookup.html
51 ms
show_ads_impl.js
64 ms
collect
39 ms
blank_image-comment.jpg
26 ms
blank_image-comment.jpg
25 ms
blank_image-comment.jpg
50 ms
ads
995 ms
blank_image-comment.jpg
11 ms
osd.js
9 ms
ads
953 ms
ads
919 ms
fql
156 ms
gpp.xml
14105 ms
fql
151 ms
fql
147 ms
fql
142 ms
fql
140 ms
fql
139 ms
fql
13540 ms
fql
13539 ms
fql
13534 ms
fql
13533 ms
4635606203567366392
13446 ms
abg.js
13447 ms
m_js_controller.js
13445 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
13519 ms
1516630967326104852
13447 ms
x_button_blue2.png
7 ms
s
30 ms
E4WYPs_lNJIuXrWpTsOcc3FIG36RfI0ERc0srw5QW9Y.js
2 ms
concurringopinions.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
concurringopinions.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
concurringopinions.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Concurringopinions.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Concurringopinions.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
concurringopinions.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Concurringopinions. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: