Tools & Wizards About Us
conotext.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 20

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    37% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 38% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

conotext.com

Conotext - Digital Agency for Banks, Credit Unions & Fintech

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

99 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

244 ms

conotext.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Conotext content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about conotext.com

Conotext is a full-service digital marketing agency serving credit unions, banks and the fintech industry including search & content marketing. .

Visit conotext.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Conotext.com page load time and found that the first response time was 99 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

conotext.com performance score

20

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

56/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.9 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.5 s

18/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value5,250 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.136

80/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value23.5 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

conotext.com

99 ms

conotext.com

188 ms

css

37 ms

widget.js

196 ms

jquery.min.js

59 ms

Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 41% of them (17 requests) were addressed to the original Conotext.com, 44% (18 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (572 ms) belongs to the original domain Conotext.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 148.2 kB (29%)

Content Size

505.7 kB

After Optimization

357.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Conotext.com main page is 505.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 201.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 122.3 kB

  • Original 148.5 kB
  • After minification 145.8 kB
  • After compression 26.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 122.3 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 201.9 kB
  • After minification 201.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Conotext images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 21.6 kB

  • Original 136.5 kB
  • After minification 136.5 kB
  • After compression 114.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 21.6 kB or 16% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 4.3 kB

  • Original 18.8 kB
  • After minification 18.8 kB
  • After compression 14.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Conotext.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.3 kB or 23% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (45%)

Requests Now

20

After Optimization

11

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 20 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Conotext. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

conotext.com

conotext.com

99 ms

conotext.com

conotext.com

188 ms

css

css

37 ms

widget.js

widget.js

196 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

59 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

99 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

209 ms

jquery.fitvids.js

jquery.fitvids.js

121 ms

common.js

common.js

114 ms

smush-lazy-load.min.js

smush-lazy-load.min.js

123 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

90 ms

Conotext-reversed.png

Conotext-reversed.png

123 ms

Home_Hero_1500x600.png

Home_Hero_1500x600.png

341 ms

BrandAw_prize.gif

BrandAw_prize.gif

572 ms

js

js

138 ms

insight.min.js

insight.min.js

137 ms

Conotext-reversed.png

Conotext-reversed.png

81 ms

CustAcq_peopleMagnet.gif

CustAcq_peopleMagnet.gif

401 ms

CSR44z5ZnPydRjlCCwlC0OI6T_N-.ttf

CSR44z5ZnPydRjlCCwlC0OI6T_N-.ttf

80 ms

CSR44z5ZnPydRjlCCwlCzOE6T_N-.ttf

CSR44z5ZnPydRjlCCwlCzOE6T_N-.ttf

81 ms

CSR44z5ZnPydRjlCCwlC6OA6T_N-.ttf

CSR44z5ZnPydRjlCCwlC6OA6T_N-.ttf

94 ms

CSR44z5ZnPydRjlCCwlCtOM6T_N-.ttf

CSR44z5ZnPydRjlCCwlCtOM6T_N-.ttf

95 ms

CSR44z5ZnPydRjlCCwlCmOQ6T_N-.ttf

CSR44z5ZnPydRjlCCwlCmOQ6T_N-.ttf

109 ms

CSR94z5ZnPydRjlCCwlKa8cq.ttf

CSR94z5ZnPydRjlCCwlKa8cq.ttf

109 ms

CSR44z5ZnPydRjlCCwlCwOU6T_N-.ttf

CSR44z5ZnPydRjlCCwlCwOU6T_N-.ttf

108 ms

CSR44z5ZnPydRjlCCwlCpOY6T_N-.ttf

CSR44z5ZnPydRjlCCwlCpOY6T_N-.ttf

106 ms

CSR74z5ZnPydRjlCCwlCCPctaNM.ttf

CSR74z5ZnPydRjlCCwlCCPctaNM.ttf

108 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf

127 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

117 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf

117 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aX8.ttf

126 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aX8.ttf

126 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf

117 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

126 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf

127 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aX8.ttf

126 ms

modules.woff

modules.woff

87 ms

insight_tag_errors.gif

insight_tag_errors.gif

112 ms

Home_RE_Talk.gif

Home_RE_Talk.gif

158 ms

ContentSEO_Web_icon.gif

ContentSEO_Web_icon.gif

334 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

49 ms

Accessibility Review

conotext.com accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

conotext.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

conotext.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Conotext.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Conotext.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

conotext.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Conotext. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: