Tools & Wizards About Us
conservationforce.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 43

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    62% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

conservationforce.org

Conservation Force | A Force for Wildlife Conservation

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

87 ms

Resources Loaded

2.6 sec

Page Rendered

57 ms

conservationforce.org screenshot

About Website

Welcome to conservationforce.org homepage info - get ready to check Conservation Force best content right away, or after learning these important things about conservationforce.org

A world with more abundant game, wildlife and marine life, and secure natural places kept relevant forever through traditional human enjoyment.

Visit conservationforce.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Conservationforce.org page load time and found that the first response time was 87 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

conservationforce.org performance score

43

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

41/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.2 s

43/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value490 ms

59/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.8 s

22/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.conservationforce.org

87 ms

minified.js

30 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

60 ms

polyfill.min.js

1121 ms

thunderbolt-commons.5df16dfe.bundle.min.js

48 ms

Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Conservationforce.org, 42% (22 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com and 29% (15 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 744.9 kB (56%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

595.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Conservationforce.org main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 857.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 657.8 kB

  • Original 857.2 kB
  • After minification 855.6 kB
  • After compression 199.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 657.8 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-33%

Potential reduce by 77.7 kB

  • Original 232.7 kB
  • After minification 155.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Conservation Force needs image optimization as it can save up to 77.7 kB or 33% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 9.3 kB

  • Original 250.0 kB
  • After minification 250.0 kB
  • After compression 240.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (27%)

Requests Now

37

After Optimization

27

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Conservation Force. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.conservationforce.org

www.conservationforce.org

87 ms

minified.js

minified.js

30 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

60 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

1121 ms

thunderbolt-commons.5df16dfe.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.5df16dfe.bundle.min.js

48 ms

main.dda15fae.bundle.min.js

main.dda15fae.bundle.min.js

47 ms

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

46 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

48 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

50 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

51 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

50 ms

87ac64_f182a682d6674301b94b138fd3e11470.jpg

87ac64_f182a682d6674301b94b138fd3e11470.jpg

349 ms

87ac64_f89198776bcb421b8d090bfba2f37a7f.jpg

87ac64_f89198776bcb421b8d090bfba2f37a7f.jpg

683 ms

image001.png

image001.png

567 ms

WSF.png

WSF.png

540 ms

SSCI_Logo.jpg

SSCI_Logo.jpg

637 ms

HSC.png

HSC.png

533 ms

IPHA_Logo_150_DS-1.png

IPHA_Logo_150_DS-1.png

502 ms

87ac64_b5c20a1f19b74636919d1c9162404689~mv2.gif

87ac64_b5c20a1f19b74636919d1c9162404689~mv2.gif

504 ms

87ac64_53417007a85b46d8a6b99e7a0f2eb583~mv2.jpg

87ac64_53417007a85b46d8a6b99e7a0f2eb583~mv2.jpg

790 ms

87ac64_c40504c87a5943e1a797a436204642cc~mv2.jpg

87ac64_c40504c87a5943e1a797a436204642cc~mv2.jpg

753 ms

logo_cms_0.png

logo_cms_0.png

696 ms

87ac64_8fc19baaa8804cb5a04ad091e45aa4f3.jpg

87ac64_8fc19baaa8804cb5a04ad091e45aa4f3.jpg

673 ms

87ac64_26a11c1a264d4d7c844c1fd31fc01d90~mv2.jpg

87ac64_26a11c1a264d4d7c844c1fd31fc01d90~mv2.jpg

871 ms

87ac64_bb8d8e74d4514956babeed791b5bcc3d~mv2.jpg

87ac64_bb8d8e74d4514956babeed791b5bcc3d~mv2.jpg

919 ms

87ac64_943e7c68393f44f889973894e813a6a5.jpg

87ac64_943e7c68393f44f889973894e813a6a5.jpg

927 ms

87ac64_7538d52db7b548f08c27fee05823221a~mv2.png

87ac64_7538d52db7b548f08c27fee05823221a~mv2.png

933 ms

CSC%20logo.jpg

CSC%20logo.jpg

893 ms

dscstraight.png

dscstraight.png

923 ms

WSF.png

WSF.png

972 ms

image001.png

image001.png

1027 ms

IPHA_Logo_150_DS-1.png

IPHA_Logo_150_DS-1.png

1020 ms

87ac64_e1901104ac734dfbaae43095ff250429~mv2.jpg

87ac64_e1901104ac734dfbaae43095ff250429~mv2.jpg

1180 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

49 ms

108 ms

106 ms

107 ms

108 ms

105 ms

101 ms

142 ms

143 ms

141 ms

141 ms

139 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

5 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

22 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

4 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

15 ms

WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff

WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff

8 ms

WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff

WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff

3 ms

WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff

WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff

3 ms

Accessibility Review

conservationforce.org accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

conservationforce.org best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

conservationforce.org SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Conservationforce.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Conservationforce.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

conservationforce.org

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Conservation Force. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: